JG or Gimlin, either one, sign an affidavit and take a polygraph I would concede they have nothing to hide and my questioning would end...I would sincerely apologize to all involved and claim their complete innocence of any wrong doings...
Like you...let's cut the crap and get to the bottom line...I dislike the bantering back and forth...my questioning here of JG was like a cat and mouse game...he answered questions but he answered the questions he chose to answer...
My problem with JG...he claims that is not Bob Titmus when clearly it is...he claims Hodgsen made a mistake about the time lines involved and Hodgsen didn't pick him up at the airport the first time he came down...Hodgsen, in a taped interview, recalls picking JG and group up with Hodgsen's son hugging the dog in the back of his station wagon...Hodgsen doesn't have a dog in the race...he simply told his part he was involved in...JG claiming the transparency had been changed...ridiculas statement...when we know Bonney did the changes in frame 352...JG denied knowing who developed the film when he knows exactly who developed the film...we know who developed the film...the time lines because of shown foliage in the films...not one person has given us any reason to believe their reports have a shred of proof...a man goes down to Bluff Creek in November 1967 finding a make shift coral and hay...why wasn't this reported in their reports and why would you build a make shift coral if your stay was but a few days?...Titmus reportedly goes down 9 days after the filming and collects castings of tracks but yet Gimlin had to, in his report, borrow a backhoe to pull his truck out because of a torrential rain causing mud slides?...how the hell can tracks remain in tack after a torrential rain?...they can't...also JG saying the dung on the sand bar looked like rocks...JG...we can clearly see in the Dahinden film that not only you but the dog and handler pays close attention to this dung...why would you deny this?...maybe it is horse dung since JG stated here on this forum he would have collected had it been from a creature and that alone would put horses, Patterson and Gimlin, there with them...
I know JG claims MK is using an old copy of the Patterson film and I know where and why MK received the copy...but since then MK has gathered copies of the transparencies and better film quality...MK hasn't changed, added or manipulated any of the frames other then add color...the red on Titmus hands...look at the red jeep in the back ground...after adding a shade of red you can now clearly see the jeep is red though you could see it was red before the added color...
Why is everyone wrong but John Green?...is he and Gimlin guilty...by interviews and film evidence they are...if they went to court with the evidence at hand there is no doubt in my mind they would be prosecuted...BTW...I am not after John Green, Bob Gimlin or any of those involved...I'm after the truth...
This message has been edited by tiny from IP address 67.33.122.98 on Nov 4, 2009 11:34 AM
Posted on Nov 4, 2009, 11:26 AM from IP address 67.33.122.98
