Open your eyes...it's there as plain as the nose on your face...and tell us...why wouldn't they agree to a polygraph and affidavits?...If your innocence take the plunge...prove us wrong...
you wrote:
Those film images can have many other explanations and interpretations than what you and MK Davies are suggesting.
MH wrote: okay...I do understand so spend some time and logically explain the stills and animations that have been put up...
1. start with the right thigh wound...
2. the blood on the bottom of her left foot...BTW...there was not any color added...this came from the transparencies...
3. explain the back wound...
4. the muzzle flash...
5. how this creatures has to put her hand/arm down to catch herself from going down...
6. explain the bloody dog print in the Patterson film...remember...this came from the transparencies without any color added...
are you a player about giving us your interpretations or just crowing a bit about something you can't see, refuse to see or just don't understand...
Posted on Nov 9, 2009, 3:46 PM from IP address 74.226.185.212
