When I say something and you reply, and I reply, there's always something I see that you do not. There are things I don't see, as well. And when I reply with something that I see and you don't, you always think that I'm trying to pick a fight with you and you never seem to think that I could be talking about what I know.
Now let me just say that some aspects of your reply kinda struck me as blind.
Starting with Number One, she still said that her birthday was 1989, which would make her 13, 14 after her birthday. That wasn't implying anything about your mental capacity when I argued your point. I knew what I was saying.
You say on your second point that I had to think for an entire week and a few days to think up a reply to that post. Let me just say that I think that was the stupidest thing I have ever seen you write. Why would it take someone a whole week to think up something on a MESSAGE BOARD?! If I'm away from one region for a while, so what? I don't really frequent the Impro board because there's a LOT less activity, and the impros aren't clearly marked. If there was another one I was aware of, then it should probably have the tag "[IMPRO]" by it so that people don't waste their time searching around.
On point three and four, you were assuming, and we all know what that does when you do: It makes an "ass" of "u" and "me." [/blatantpun]
And finally, point five: Perhaps you should get to know Rhiannon. She's in tenth, same as I am.
Now, all this adds up to the fact that you still think that I messed up some kind of logical process while thinking that Rhiannon was 13. I DON'T think that she's 13, she said that her birth date was a few years later than I thought it was.
Do you see any further reason to discuss this? I sure don't.
-Sherlock
"Rockin' around the clock tonight!"
Posted on May 19, 2003, 8:50 PM from IP address 172.139.156.6