Home > Discussion Groups > In Focus

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=235270&messageid=1113823287
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

Advertisement
 Return to Index  

Picture test again

February 14 2009 at 1:51 PM
  (Login Superjolly)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 94.193.206.160

Hello again,
OK this time it's the same subject but using a new Canon 450D. A friend of mine thought that I had lost the crispness and detail a bit by using energy saving bulbs, as opposed to the older tungsten filament daylight bulbs I had used previously.However after reading a couple of posts here by Mike Rinaldi and using F22 or F20 aperture settings instead of my usual F29 or more, plus the extra 6 million pixels that the 450D has over my older 300D I'm hoping the pics might look sharper. Anyway here goes;

100 ASA;AWB;F20
[linked image]

100 ASA;AWB;F22
[linked image]

100 ASA;Daylight;F20;
[linked image]

100 ASA;Daylight;F22;
[linked image]

One thing I have noticed is that the energy daving bulbs do give a more accurate colour rendition so I think I'll be keeping them. Over to you! happy.gif
Regards
Andy K

--------------------------------------------

www.notaussiefloyd.com

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Too much jpg loss to really tell..... - Val Bueno on Feb 17, 8:51 AM
    1. Interesting... - Andy King on Feb 18, 8:49 AM
     


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse