See CNO Is Bogus
The Mankiller 1 & 2
Keetoowah History
Keetoowah Website
Leeds on 99 Const
BIA 2009 Decision
Cherokee Observer
Stacy Leeds.Com
William J Newchief
The UKB Forum
John C Facebook
Cornsilks.com
Today is

John and David Articles

Indianz.com Articles

A bia letter to CNO

John's Place on Facebook
Freedmen Links
Indianz dot com news
Our Cherokee Rights
Chief Bill John Baker
UKB Can Vote CNO
Real Poverty Video
A Tsalagi Seal Story
Tsalagi Think Tank
Council Recap Page
Real Cherokee FB
David C Facebook
   

Ruling in the Freedmen case

July 29 2008 at 4:49 PM
John Cornsilk  (Login JohnCornsilk)
John's Place Users

 


The district court determined that the Cherokee Nation

was a required party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26

19(a).6 Having concluded that the district court erred in

holding that the Cherokee Nation was amenable to suit, we

reverse the judgment in part. On remand, the district court

must determine whether “in equity and good conscience” the

suit can proceed with the Cherokee Nation’s officers but

without the Cherokee Nation itself. See FED. R. CIV. P. 19(b).

So ordered.

CLICK HERE for the whole thang!!

Now some body tell me what da heck this means!!






John "The Elder" Cornsilk


 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

Find more forums on Network54Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Links To Other Places
Sequoyah Times
Muskogee Phoenix
Daily Oklahoman
Tulsa Channel 2
The Tahlequah Press
Perchanga Blog Spot

freedmen5tribes
Tulsa Channel 6
Keetoowah Band
Freedmen Board
Tulsa World News
Tulsa Channel 8