--


Well.....

by Anonymous (no login)

 
First point if you are a nonmember, how do you know what the APMA is or isn't doing. I receive daily updates via email as a member. In addition, I receive faxes and the APMA News you do not. I attend their scientific meetings and get reports while there. Perhaps if did see some of this you would have all of the information before making uninformed comments.

They did take a look at the Gale issue and made a decision what if anything they coulds/should do. It would be a big mistake for our professional organization to get involved with state licensing issues for some of the reasons stated above and many others.From reports I have seen the Gale issue is resolved. By working through the state and legal systems the board has been replaced and Dr Gale is moving on and doing well. So the system worked and noboby said it would be easy. It takes hardwork and Dr. gale should be applauded. Something I again challenge you complainers to take example of. If an issue is important to you you have to work to correct not everyone else.

Years ago I worked hard to open hospitals that were closed to DPMs and eventually opened 3. I lost referral sources, spent money on legal fees, and was under significant stress. Many of my colleagues were approached for help and I was told nothing could be done, no they couldn't help with the cost, and they didn't have the time. After winning the battles over several years these same people applied for staff privileges and even opened offices at these facilties. Their right but I learned their are people who care, leaders, and parasites. Which are you?
If you care support your profession help make changes. They make take years to win so you have to patient and work. If you do not think we have advanced you need to study history. Look at prescribing privileges, hospital access, scope, the schools, and residency training. Compare just those issues from the 1950s, 60s, 70s etc. If you can not see the drastic changes this profession has made in the last 50 years you need to assess your reasom why.


I routinely call the state and national associations and always have my questions answered. If you are a nonmember you do not deserve their time and energy. They should address problems that members have first and really have no reason to help you. You already benefit for free when they do help podiatry. Even though you benefit I and other members foot the bill and you complain.

Do I always agree with what they do, of course not but atleast I can offer my opinion and have persuaded change at various levels (often at time away from my practice/family while you still work and play with your kids).

So you embarass yourselfs when you say nothing has been done or that APMa is worthless.

My opinion

Posted on May 1, 2003, 10:42 AM
from IP address 152.163.189.129

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Find more forums on Medical SchoolsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Welcome to the PODIATRY FORUM created in 1999

DISCLAIMER: The Podiatry Forum (PF) is moderated.  It often takes up to seven days for messages to be posted by the moderator.   All poster should be aware that slanderous, libelous, derogatory, highly personal or unsubstantiated comments are not permitted.  The webmaster and moderators assume no responsibility as to the validity of posts appearing in the PF and chatroom.  All posts should be independently verified by the PF user.  Opinions expressed in the PF are not those of the webmaster nor moderators. The poster bares all legal, civil, criminal and monetary responsibilities for their posts on the Podiatry Forum and chatroom.
All Prospective Students should be aware that in a forum of this nature, more negative comments about podiatry will exists and sentiments expressed by posters does not necessarily reflect the profession as a whole.  If posts on the PF seem to be of a negative nature, it is not by design.  The intent of the webmaster and moderators is to facilitate positive constructivism and create a podiatric community through cooperation.  Therefore, the comments expressed on the PF are solely the opinion of the poster and by appearing in the PF and chatroom do not constitute any approval by the webmaster or moderator.  Individuals considering a career in podiatric medicine should not rely on messages/posters in the PF to form the basis of their decision to enter the field.

Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.  All rights reserved.  Posts become the property of The Podiatry Forum.  Messages in whole or in part may not be copied or used in any manner without the written consent of the webmaster. Individuals seeking advice on medical conditions should contact a licensed podiatrist for evaluation and treatment. Medical advice given on the Podiatry Forum is for information purposes only and the accuracy of such advice cannot be guaranteed.