Careful

by Anonymous (no login)

 
If your state permits it, you have the appropriate malpractice, your program permits moonlighting, AND it doesn't take away from your residency education then I have no problem with it.

The dilemma is: Are not most cases being done during your residency work week? Unless you have a day off during the week when cases are done or they are being done on off weekends or in offices during time you are not working as a resident then I do not see how this is possible. Even if you do have a day off during the week, is a case that day OK to bill for but the next day a case with the same attending when you are working as a resident not OK? It's a slippery slope. My recommendation is that you are either a doctor in training or you are not and blurring the line usually leads to trouble. In addition, you would need to be on the insurance plans. How would you like a Medicare audit as a resident? Especially when they pay for the cost of your residency and may interpret any billing as fraud. Worse if you bill out of network and do not bill the balance for deductibles and co pays you are commiting fraud. Get caught and see how hard it will be to get access to these plans when you graduate. How about this scenario, you assist on a case and perhaps you would have done a different procedure than the attending or the follow up is different then yours? Now you get sued what do you do? And as a resident are you not admitting that you are still learning and perhaps your opinions are inexperienced and those of a doctor in training? Finally, your discounted malpractice rates you get as a new attending would kick in while you are practicing as a resident. This means when you do graduate your rates will be factored in as an attending in year 3. Some states will require you be considered a attending rahter than a resident when charging association dues.

Factor in those costs and risks with the minimal cases and income it may not be worth it.

Moonlighting by MDs has been drastically cut. Hospital liability companies are frowning upon it or not permitting it. This is for both the hospital with the training program and the hospital where the resident moonlights. A few rural hospitals have no choice but you can see the medicolegal nightmare this creates. In addition even if permitted this coverage is typically done in off times for the resident. An ER would have better opportunities than doing elective surgical cases.

Last comment. It's not just surgery. I know of residents doing hospital consults and house calls. An attending and the resident enter into some fee splitting arrangement. Same issues exist and fee splitting is unethical. In addition some of these stellar attendings even bill under their name. My advice, stay away from these deals. Why blow all of your hard work over a gray area?

Posted on Nov 22, 2004, 9:42 AM
from IP address 205.188.116.130

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Response TitleAuthor and Date
I Totally Agree!3yr Sx Resident on Dec 12, 8:20 PM

Find more forums on Medical SchoolsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Welcome to the PODIATRY FORUM created in 1999

DISCLAIMER: The Podiatry Forum (PF) is moderated.  It often takes up to seven days for messages to be posted by the moderator.   All poster should be aware that slanderous, libelous, derogatory, highly personal or unsubstantiated comments are not permitted.  The webmaster and moderators assume no responsibility as to the validity of posts appearing in the PF and chatroom.  All posts should be independently verified by the PF user.  Opinions expressed in the PF are not those of the webmaster nor moderators. The poster bares all legal, civil, criminal and monetary responsibilities for their posts on the Podiatry Forum and chatroom.
All Prospective Students should be aware that in a forum of this nature, more negative comments about podiatry will exists and sentiments expressed by posters does not necessarily reflect the profession as a whole.  If posts on the PF seem to be of a negative nature, it is not by design.  The intent of the webmaster and moderators is to facilitate positive constructivism and create a podiatric community through cooperation.  Therefore, the comments expressed on the PF are solely the opinion of the poster and by appearing in the PF and chatroom do not constitute any approval by the webmaster or moderator.  Individuals considering a career in podiatric medicine should not rely on messages/posters in the PF to form the basis of their decision to enter the field.

Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.  All rights reserved.  Posts become the property of The Podiatry Forum.  Messages in whole or in part may not be copied or used in any manner without the written consent of the webmaster. Individuals seeking advice on medical conditions should contact a licensed podiatrist for evaluation and treatment. Medical advice given on the Podiatry Forum is for information purposes only and the accuracy of such advice cannot be guaranteed.