Incorrect deduction

by efs (no login)

 
Thank you for providing the reference, but you really didn't read it. You took one small portion where it classified phycisians and then incorrectly extrapolated it to make it sound like what you wanted to say.

From the information you gave, you cannot deduct that DPMs are not classified as physicians, only that they do not fall under the classification of "medical doctor". If you would read the part where they define physicians you would see that this is a much broader term. In fact you will actually find that all of those other doctors do fall under the definition of a physician. I found it easy enough to cut and past the appropriate section for your reading pleasure.

Enjoy.


From the Social Security Act §1861(r) definition of a physician

Physician
(r) The term “physician”, when used in connection with the performance of any function or action, means (1) a doctor of medicine or osteopathy legally authorized to practice medicine and surgery by the State in which he performs such function or action (including a physician within the meaning of section 1101(a)(7)), (2) a doctor of dental surgery or of dental medicine who is legally authorized to practice dentistry by the State in which he performs such function and who is acting within the scope of his license when he performs such functions, (3) a doctor of podiatric medicine for the purposes of subsections (k), (m), (p)(1), and (s) of this section and sections 1814(a), 1832(a)(2)(F)(ii), and 1835 but only with respect to functions which he is legally authorized to perform as such by the State in which he performs them, (4) a doctor of optometry, but only for purposes of subsection (p)(1) with respect to the provision of items or services described in subsection (s) which he is legally authorized to perform as a doctor of optometry by the State in which he performs them, or (5) a chiropractor who is licensed as such by the State (or in a State which does not license chiropractors as such, is legally authorized to perform the services of a chiropractor in the jurisdiction in which he performs such services), and who meets uniform minimum standards promulgated by the Secretary, but only for the purpose of sections 1861(s)(1) and 1861(s)(2)(A) and only with respect to treatment by means of manual manipulation of the spine (to correct a subluxation) which he is legally authorized to perform by the State or jurisdiction in which such treatment is provided. For the purposes of section 1862(a)(4) and subject to the limitations and conditions provided in the previous sentence, such term includes a doctor of one of the arts, specified in such previous sentence, legally authorized to practice such art in the country in which the inpatient hospital services (referred to in such section 1862(a)(4)) are furnished.

Posted on Jan 20, 2005, 9:37 PM
from IP address 24.225.60.114

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Response TitleAuthor and Date
Re: Incorrect deductionRD on Jan 28, 5:12 PM
 Re: Incorrect deductionAnonymous on Jan 30, 7:16 PM
  Negativity is Sometimes Realitya. on Feb 8, 3:27 PM
Negativity in the ForumAnnonymous on Feb 8, 11:35 PM

Find more forums on Medical SchoolsCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Welcome to the PODIATRY FORUM created in 1999

DISCLAIMER: The Podiatry Forum (PF) is moderated.  It often takes up to seven days for messages to be posted by the moderator.   All poster should be aware that slanderous, libelous, derogatory, highly personal or unsubstantiated comments are not permitted.  The webmaster and moderators assume no responsibility as to the validity of posts appearing in the PF and chatroom.  All posts should be independently verified by the PF user.  Opinions expressed in the PF are not those of the webmaster nor moderators. The poster bares all legal, civil, criminal and monetary responsibilities for their posts on the Podiatry Forum and chatroom.
All Prospective Students should be aware that in a forum of this nature, more negative comments about podiatry will exists and sentiments expressed by posters does not necessarily reflect the profession as a whole.  If posts on the PF seem to be of a negative nature, it is not by design.  The intent of the webmaster and moderators is to facilitate positive constructivism and create a podiatric community through cooperation.  Therefore, the comments expressed on the PF are solely the opinion of the poster and by appearing in the PF and chatroom do not constitute any approval by the webmaster or moderator.  Individuals considering a career in podiatric medicine should not rely on messages/posters in the PF to form the basis of their decision to enter the field.

Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.  All rights reserved.  Posts become the property of The Podiatry Forum.  Messages in whole or in part may not be copied or used in any manner without the written consent of the webmaster. Individuals seeking advice on medical conditions should contact a licensed podiatrist for evaluation and treatment. Medical advice given on the Podiatry Forum is for information purposes only and the accuracy of such advice cannot be guaranteed.