Physicianby Anonymous (no login)It is people like RD who make the physician title so important. He would argue that dermatologists etc are physicians with that specialty but DPMs are never physicians. Whether you agree or disagree the term is more than semantics. Hospital bylaws, state law, and insurer payments all have the term physician. If someone like RD successfully argues that DPMs are not physicians then we are discriminated againcst at several levels. That is why most federal programs consider us "physicians". Several insurers already pay DPMs at a lower reimbursment than MDs/DOs for the same procedure codes. Hardly fair if the care is the same or better. The family MD who attempts an ingrown toenail repair that fails and ends up in the DPM specialist office is often reimbursed higher then the DPM who resolved the problem. This happens for even E/M codes. Now, anywhere in state law where it says a physician can do this or that, DPMs may be eliminated if RD makes the call. This may be as simple as allowing a handicap parking sticker or as complicated as nurses/PAs/ANP working for us or taking our orders. Some hospital bylaws permit active staff and committee appointments only for "physicians". Now imagine no DPM representation on the credentials and other committees regardless how busy you may be at the hospital. I feel because of our ability to treat the lower extremity "full scope" we are physicians. This is what distinguishes us from tne OD, DC, PT etc. Regardless, until discrimination by degree is eliminated titles remain important. from IP address 205.188.116.130 Goto Forum Home |
| Response Title | Author and Date |
| Rely | on Mar 7, 11:45 PM |
| Same here | anonymous on Mar 13, 7:45 AM |
| Find more forums on Medical Schools | Create your own forum at Network54 |
| Copyright © 1999-2008 Network54. All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement |
DISCLAIMER: The Podiatry Forum (PF) is
moderated. It often takes up to seven days for messages to
be posted by the moderator. All poster should be
aware that slanderous, libelous, derogatory, highly personal or unsubstantiated
comments are not permitted. The webmaster and moderators assume no
responsibility as to the validity of posts appearing in the PF and chatroom.
All posts should be independently verified by the PF user. Opinions
expressed in the PF are not those of the webmaster nor moderators. The
poster bares all legal, civil, criminal and monetary responsibilities for their
posts on the Podiatry Forum and chatroom.
All Prospective Students should be aware that in a
forum of this nature, more negative comments about podiatry will exists and
sentiments expressed by posters does not necessarily reflect the profession as a
whole. If posts on the PF seem to be of a negative nature, it is not by
design. The intent of the webmaster and moderators is to facilitate
positive constructivism and create a podiatric community through cooperation.
Therefore, the comments expressed on the PF are solely the opinion of the poster
and by appearing in the PF and chatroom do not constitute any approval by the
webmaster or moderator. Individuals considering a career in podiatric
medicine should not rely on messages/posters in the PF to form the basis of
their decision to enter the field.
Copyright 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005. All rights reserved. Posts become the property of The Podiatry Forum. Messages in whole or in part may not be copied or used in any manner without the written consent of the webmaster. Individuals seeking advice on medical conditions should contact a licensed podiatrist for evaluation and treatment. Medical advice given on the Podiatry Forum is for information purposes only and the accuracy of such advice cannot be guaranteed.