Long Live Warrior Race of Khorasan! Home of The Black Banners!
"If we do [what Hezbollah accomplished], this Israeli army full of gay soldiers and full of corruption and with old-fashioned war methods can be defeated also in Palestine."
==================================
Tu dhoop hain jham se bikhar
Tu hai nadee o bekhabar
Beh chal kahin ud chal kahin
Dil khush jahan teri toh manzil hai wahin.
what brave thing u fags has done lately other then open ur mouths for every nation in the world to piss in.
have u forgotten ur history boy.
now its pakis and americans, before it was russians , even before them it was sikhs, then persians , mongols, huns, greeks,mauryans,mughals,arabs etc etc etc.
did i forget any nation who hasnt ruled over u brave people.
when were u free the last time????????????????????????????
i think that was in dinasaurs period. but i bet they ruled over u also.
so before i gave u a nice wack in ur a$$ and u run to ur mommy in the cave why dont u shut ur stupid mouth.
tuyt tut tut... why the verbal diarrohea indian boy??? lol
i think I detect a hint ENVY against your masters of 1000 yrs
AN INDIAn talking about getting ruled, lol!!!!!!!!
well my little rown chimp of a friend here are some facts...
1) YOU INDIANS = THE DOORMAT RACE OF HISTORY!!!!!
2) NO RACE IN THE WORLD HAS BEEN RULED AS MUCH AS YOU INDIANS
3) YOU HAVE BEEN THE MUSLIMS DOORMATS FOR 1400 YEARS:)
4) RULED BY AFGHANS FOR ONE THOUSAND YEARS
5) RULED BY BRITISH FOR 200 YEARS...THEY GAVE YOU THE NAME INDIA.. WHILE PASHTUNS WERE FIGHTING BRITISH YOUR DADDIED WERE CLEANING THEIR BOOTS AND OFFERING THEM THEIR WOMEN!!!
6) RULED BY PERSIANS = who gave you the name HINDUSTAN
7) RULED BY TURKS
heres your ppl
heres your forefathers history
^ sikh/indian servants of british raj
and heres your history
all with facts
like I said Pashtuns/Pathans HAVE BEEN YOU DADDIES FOR ONE THOUSAND YEARS... awful long time isnt it boy!!!!!!! lol!!!!!!!!
One Thousand years of Turko-Pathan supremacy in Hindustan
The spread of Islam in the tribal belt dates back to the rise of the Turkish dynasty in Ghazni from about 960 AD. Mahmud of Ghazni conquered and incorporated areas of the subcontinent up to Lahore. Ghorid Sultan Muizzuddin Muhammad, with his headquarters in Ghor, subdued the north part of the subcontinent and was the founder of Muslim supremacy in Delhi in 1206. The fall of the Ghorids was followed by successive incursions of various forces from Central Asia. The most notable of these were those of conquerors Genghis Khan in 1221 and of Timur in 1398.
The tribesmen formed the spearhead of the Muslim penetration and conquest of India, first as soldiers of fortune and later as powerful kings, even as sultans and emperors.[citation needed] The Turks were a small band of chosen favourites; the soldiers, and later the rulers, were Ghaljis or Pathans.[citation needed] Apart from the Turks, i.e. Ghaznavids (1001-1186), Ghorids (1186-1290), and Tughlaqs (1321-1451), three Pathan dynasties, i.e., Khaljis (1290-1321), Lodis (1451-1526) and Suris (1539-55), had sat on the throne of Delhi. But their authority did not extend over the tribal belt. Babur, the conqueror of India and founder of the Mughal dynasty, wrote of the empire of Lodis that its writ did not run effectively west of the Indus, and it had no control over the Afghan or Pathan homelands from which its rulers had originally come.[citation needed]
The Pathan dynasties who ruled in India attracted many frontiersmen to their banners."[citation needed] The firman (royal edict) of Bahlol Lodhi (1451-1489), the ruler of Delhi, encouraging frontier tribes of the northwest to take service in Delhi stated:
Hindustan can best be held by somebody who rules over a nation with tribes. Let every Afghan tribesman bring his relatives leading a life of indigence, let them come and take up estates in Hind, relieving themselves from straitened circumstances, and supporting the State against powerful enemies.[citation needed]
The declining flow of Pathan warriors from the tribal belt may be one of the important causes of their downfall.[citation needed] The lack of support became obvious after the death of Sher Shah Suri in 1555.
This message has been edited by ShujaKhan on Aug 30, 2009 5:29 AM This message has been edited by ShujaKhan on Aug 30, 2009 5:27 AM This message has been edited by ShujaKhan on Aug 30, 2009 5:15 AM
look closely u cave resident. they are ur papas.
look they are wearing womens cloth like u guys.skirts and salwars.
and btw ur not white like u claim. ur dark and white people beat u for it and then u say sorry that ur dark.
those are dark skinny pashtuns not sikhs. u were also part of british empire my little faggot.tell me the name of ur city and i will tell u its history.
sikhs(jats) were not servants they were army men. u were considered week and unreliable and fags so british used u as their toilet cleaners and wet nurses.
arsenal doesnt this jatrat live in a FANTASY land...
you make good shopkeepers and cooks... BUT NOT FIGHTERS
so my lil brown indian friend...
here is you history
slaves of muslim and British 1400 years... Pashtuns Turks and Persians took it in TURNS TO RAPE YOU FOR POCKET MONEY WITHOUT ANY RESISTANCE... YOUR COUNTRY IS ONE BIG BROTHEL
Ghaznavids (1001-1186),
Ghorids (1186-1290),
and Tughlaqs (1321-1451),
^^^^....you see we have SPIT roasted you for centuries... seee we Pashtuns, Persians and Turks used yu like a slag and had our fill as we wished... YOUR LEGS WERE ALWAYS OPEN... like all indians... NO RESISTANCE
below is HOW THE BRITISH COMPARES PATHANS TO YOU SIKHS... even though YOUSERVED BRITISH WITHOUT A WHIMPER OF RESISTANCE AND THE AFGHANS FOUGHT BRITISH... THE BRITISH STILL FAVOURED PATHANS, LOL... NO ONE LIKES SUBSERVIANT INDIANS/SIKHS!!!!!!!!
Elphinstone was very taken by the Pathans, especially in comparison to the Punjabis (SIKHS) of India: "The English traveller from India [...] would admire their strong and active forms, their fair complexions and European features, their industry and enterprise, the hospitality, sobriety and contempt for pleasure which appear in all their habits; and, above all, the independence and energy of their character [...] On the whole, his impression of his new acquaintance would be favourable [...] he would reckon them virtuous, compared with the people to whom he had been accustomed."
"Images of the Pathan"
type in SIKHS ON google and here are results...
EWWWWWW.... indians... EWWWWW....
Ghaznavids (1001-1186),
Ghorids (1186-1290),
and Tughlaqs (1321-1451),
One Thousand years of Turko-Pathan supremacy in Hindustan
The spread of Islam in the tribal belt dates back to the rise of the Turkish dynasty in Ghazni from about 960 AD. Mahmud of Ghazni conquered and incorporated areas of the subcontinent up to Lahore. Ghorid Sultan Muizzuddin Muhammad, with his headquarters in Ghor, subdued the north part of the subcontinent and was the founder of Muslim supremacy in Delhi in 1206. The fall of the Ghorids was followed by successive incursions of various forces from Central Asia. The most notable of these were those of conquerors Genghis Khan in 1221 and of Timur in 1398.
The tribesmen formed the spearhead of the Muslim penetration and conquest of India, first as soldiers of fortune and later as powerful kings, even as sultans and emperors.[citation needed] The Turks were a small band of chosen favourites; the soldiers, and later the rulers, were Ghaljis or Pathans.[citation needed] Apart from the Turks, i.e. Ghaznavids (1001-1186), Ghorids (1186-1290), and Tughlaqs (1321-1451), three Pathan dynasties, i.e., Khaljis (1290-1321), Lodis (1451-1526) and Suris (1539-55), had sat on the throne of Delhi. But their authority did not extend over the tribal belt. Babur, the conqueror of India and founder of the Mughal dynasty, wrote of the empire of Lodis that its writ did not run effectively west of the Indus, and it had no control over the Afghan or Pathan homelands from which its rulers had originally come.[citation needed]
The Pathan dynasties who ruled in India attracted many frontiersmen to their banners."[citation needed] The firman (royal edict) of Bahlol Lodhi (1451-1489), the ruler of Delhi, encouraging frontier tribes of the northwest to take service in Delhi stated:
Hindustan can best be held by somebody who rules over a nation with tribes. Let every Afghan tribesman bring his relatives leading a life of indigence, let them come and take up estates in Hind, relieving themselves from straitened circumstances, and supporting the State against powerful enemies.[citation needed]
The declining flow of Pathan warriors from the tribal belt may be one of the important causes of their downfall.[citation needed] The lack of support became obvious after the death of Sher Shah Suri in 1555.
This message has been edited by ShujaKhan on Aug 30, 2009 11:47 PM
little puch puch toon.. do u have stomach to badmouth sikhs in real world. you know sikh will put you in place that why talking non sense in internet sitting safe behind computer screen
beleive me lil indian... the day I fear an indian is the day I'll commt suicide out of shame, lol
The Pathans of the North West Frontier Province and Baluchistan and the Pashtuns of East Afghanistan are the same people, the same blue-eyed, fair skinned, very non-vegetarian warrior tribe. Many refer to them as one of the ten lost tribes of Israel and certainly, as illustrated by the invitation in the chai shop in Wana, they follow many of the customs of the Jews. They are also one of the biggest tribal groups in the world numbering about 15 million. They love a good scrap and they are a people famous for their inter-clan feuds and savage mountain guerrilla techniques. Pathans and Pashtuns live by a code of honour. They must provide hospitality to anyone who asks even if he be a sworn enemy. They are also driven by Badal, the cycle of revenge, invariably motivated by zar, zan, zamin - gold, women and land. This cycle of revenge is not only carried right through the whole clan but it is handed down from father to son and across the centuries. As warriors, the mountain Pathans have never been defeated.
Current Topic - Pashtuns - The beautiful Warrior Race