we conquered delhi but we didnt massacre its population we just collected our due from the mughals and after fvcking mughal begams we left the city , we didnt like mughal women, pashtun women were far better, so we left delhi in mughal hands.



On 11 March 1783, when the Sikhs entered the Red Fort in Delhi and occupied the Diwani-Am, the Mughal emperor, Shah Alam II, made a settlement with them agreeing to allow Baghel Singh to raise gurdwaras on Sikh historical sites in the city and realize six annas in a rupee (37.5%) of all the octroi duties in the capital. Baghel Singh stayed in Sabzi Mandi, with 4000 troops, and took charge of the police station in Chandni Chowk.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jat_Kingdoms_in_Medieval_India


now when turks attacked delhi under turk rule, what happens.

Nader reacted by ordering his soldiers to massacre the population and plunder the city. During the course of one day (March 22) 20,000 to 30,000 Mughals were killed by the Persian troops, forcing Mohammad Shah to beg for mercy.[15]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nader_Shah

chad yaar.. jatt this jatt that.. you have started sounding like suza khan.lol. give it a break now

*************************************************************************

chad yaar.. jatt this jatt that.. you have started sounding like suza khan.lol. give it a break now""""""""""""""""""""'


i was just warming up. but if u say so. i had so many other very interesting topics.

lol

jatt

you got f***kd for one thousand years by turks, afghans, persians and british

dont FORGET YOUR INDIAN

GOOD CURRY MAKER

GOOD CALL CENTRE BROWN BOYS

NOT FIGHTERS


One Thousand years of Turko-Pathan supremacy in Hindustan

The spread of Islam in the tribal belt dates back to the rise of the Turkish dynasty in Ghazni from about 960 AD. Mahmud of Ghazni conquered and incorporated areas of the subcontinent up to Lahore. Ghorid Sultan Muizzuddin Muhammad, with his headquarters in Ghor, subdued the north part of the subcontinent and was the founder of Muslim supremacy in Delhi in 1206. The fall of the Ghorids was followed by successive incursions of various forces from Central Asia. The most notable of these were those of conquerors Genghis Khan in 1221 and of Timur in 1398.

The tribesmen formed the spearhead of the Muslim penetration and conquest of India, first as soldiers of fortune and later as powerful kings, even as sultans and emperors.[citation needed] The Turks were a small band of chosen favourites; the soldiers, and later the rulers, were Ghaljis or Pathans.[citation needed] Apart from the Turks, i.e. Ghaznavids (1001-1186), Ghorids (1186-1290), and Tughlaqs (1321-1451), three Pathan dynasties, i.e., Khaljis (1290-1321), Lodis (1451-1526) and Suris (1539-55), had sat on the throne of Delhi. But their authority did not extend over the tribal belt. Babur, the conqueror of India and founder of the Mughal dynasty, wrote of the empire of Lodis that its writ did not run effectively west of the Indus, and it had no control over the Afghan or Pathan homelands from which its rulers had originally come.[citation needed]

The Pathan dynasties who ruled in India attracted many frontiersmen to their banners."[citation needed] The firman (royal edict) of Bahlol Lodhi (1451-1489), the ruler of Delhi, encouraging frontier tribes of the northwest to take service in Delhi stated:

Hindustan can best be held by somebody who rules over a nation with tribes. Let every Afghan tribesman bring his relatives leading a life of indigence, let them come and take up estates in Hind, relieving themselves from straitened circumstances, and supporting the State against powerful enemies.[citation needed]

The declining flow of Pathan warriors from the tribal belt may be one of the important causes of their downfall.[citation needed] The lack of support became obvious after the death of Sher Shah Suri in 1555.

you are a paki and be yourself. and you know this very well in real world little skinny you will get slaped to your momas lap if opened your dirty mouth in front of a sikh

*************************************************************************

errrr....ok.... lol everyone knows reality of an indian

we all seen indians lol

yea sure dont slap me INDIAN

indians billion times better than your filthyself if not gazillion. every one knows whats your position in pakistan. fooking servent of paki punjabis. if you are such warriors and ruled everyone then why cant get freedom from paki punjabis who keep you as chowkidars in guardhouses. fooking brick kiln labourers of paki punjabi do u have stomach to badmouth your masters in real world too.

paki punajbis have 1/10000 jatt blood and even then they make you polish their shoes. imagine if you met a real jatt

*************************************************************************

last time my ancestors met your ancestors in war they made puchtoons wear women clothes. foooking copy cats. you copy everything from us. our food, our culture, our tubans, everything and then you badmouth your masters in internet forums.

*************************************************************************

speak facts little indian boy..... facts... but then a gain u claimed a shotgun has a longer range than an ak47!!!!

it is ur founder and leader gtru nanak who wore Pathaani dres in Turki form


read boy read... taken from a SIKH site... WE ARE YOUR DADDIES REMEMBER WE ARE THE ONES THAT RULE U FOR A THOUSAND YEARS AND ESTABLISHED FIVE EMPIRES OVER YOU AS YOUR GURU NANAK SAYS BELOW

...Guru Nanak, witnessing the way that the men of Babar and the Afgani conquerors before him, had practised their religion on the people of Punjab and India had ample reason to believe that Islam had once again, gone astray.....Thus, Nanak dressed in Neela Bana: Neel Bastar lai kaprey pahirey, Turk -pathani amal kiya (adorned navy-blue dress adopting Turki form).

those pictures are sadhus. like .000000001 percent of our population. now this is how all pakis are









*************************************************************************

skinny shalwar wearing pathans are looked as churas in punjab along with castes like guzzars.. if wehave to make fun of someone who is dilthy and stink we say.. maahyava guzzar pathan tapri wass.. meaining you fooking look like a guuzzar pathan living in makeshift tent house



*************************************************************************

lol shuja
u got fvcked by jats,indians ,greeks, persians, huns, mongols,mughals, amercians, pakis etc etc.

list goes on and on and on.

still going on today.

keep dreamin boy

everyone knows the history of india.. got ****ed by afghans, persians and turks and ONLY country to get f***kd for 200 years without a whimper in resistance by the british!!

go you indians!!!

jatt can you believe him he says our gurus wear clothes like pathans... lol


goru gobind singh ji has told all sikhs to never ever believe in pathans cause pathans are like snakes and they bite the same hand that feeds them.. pandhay khan who was servent og guruji betrayed them....




After entering Nander, Guru Gobind Singh Separated His Residence from that of Badshah Bahadur Shah.

Guru Sahib kept a Pathan whose grandfather, Panday Khan, was killed by the Sixth Master Guru Hargobind Sahib, as a servant.

The story of this Pathan was known to the Sikhs and they warned Guru Sahib about it.

Guru Sahib, who already had the knowledge of this, said that He would require the Pathan's SERVICE in the future.

Guru Sahib had Ordered a few of His Sikhs to start collecting 'Chandan' Wood and other funeral-related materials.

Many days had passed when one night, as feared by the Sikhs, the Pathan attacked Guru Sahib.

Whether it was his own idea or Guruji's Hukam for his SERVICE, it all ended when Guru Sahib, using His Sword, killed the Pathan.

Guru Sahib were injured, stabbed in the chest, but after ten days, the wound was not causing any trouble anymore and Guruji started to Grant Audience to His Sikhs again during Congregations.



*************************************************************************

will u stop repeating urself over and over and over again.are u slow or dimwitted or what.

yes pathan claiming we wear womens clothes like them. tsk tsk tsk.

this shuja has gone bonkers.

shuja why are u posting nude sadhus pictures, are u feeling horny?????

no matter what you do paki will be pakis

*************************************************************************

once a slave always a slave.
slavery is in the destiny of pathans.
they were slaves 2000 years ago,and they are slave even today and will remain so until end of time.

i hates paki punjabis although they have some jatt blood. but now i have started respecting them. good they keeping pathans in their place.



*************************************************************************

pussy toons




colours of Kaziranga

 indian sikh vs paki pathan ..

 

 tiger niazi to surrender dog : quick transformation

dude are you stupid or what ??? nader was persian even you can read it on that lines you qouted above,

now when turks attacked delhi under turk rule, what happens.

Nader reacted by ordering his soldiers to massacre the population and plunder the city. During the course of one day (March 22) 20,000 to 30,000 Mughals were killed by the Persian troops, forcing Mohammad Shah to beg for mercy.[15]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..............................................GREEN INDONESIA...........................................................

his army was turk and afghan. later his army went to afghan chief ahmed shah, whom we defeated and he died from broken nose. i mean literlly, he died from broken nose infection, which we gave him ofcourse and thus avenged mughals.

Everyone has heard of Pathans, everyone has heard of Turks, who the fck are Jats? HAd to google that sht

Turks came from Central Asia and ruled Delhi (a Indian city) for hundreds of years, how long did Jatts (indians) rule Delhi (a city in their own country) lol

If you were such good fighters why did you surrender to the British??

If you are such a warrior race why dont you have a single country in the world for Jatts/Sikhs ??/

Pathans have their own country.
Pakis have their own country.

Turks have their country.

Even the Jews have their own country after trying for 1000's of years.

Where on earth is your country? (serious questions guys), why are Sikhs still ruled by Hindus??

calm down dude, dont get so worked up. we have our own country and its called india. have u heard of it.

and u are not everyone.

^^^
above poster is right, before I joint in this forum I didnt know what jat was ? first time i read that,I though WTF these peoples always proud talking about this animal, rat I mean..

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..............................................GREEN INDONESIA...........................................................

compare to midget indonesians we are giants.

compare to midget indonesians we are giants

you right, your stupidity is.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..............................................GREEN INDONESIA...........................................................

lol!!1

wll put NEUTRALS no ones heard of Jatts... these guys are blowing a trunmpet no one has ever heard..


TOTAL OWNAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


bark all you want... BUT REALITY IS WE KNOW WHO DRESSED WHO

taken from a SIKH site...

http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Talk:Guru_Nanak_in_Mecca

...Guru Nanak, witnessing the way that the men of Babar and the Afgani conquerors before him, had practised their religion on the people of Punjab and India had ample reason to believe that Islam had once again, gone astray.....Thus, Nanak dressed in Neela Bana: Neel Bastar lai kaprey pahirey, Turk -pathani amal kiya (adorned navy-blue dress adopting Turki form).







the only indians we know are those in simpsons

shuja u are a very good idiot.

apu is a legend everyone likes him.

you got f***kd for one thousand years by turks, afghans, persians and british >>>

So am I right to assume all invaders leave their superior sperm on Indian's ancestors?

Are Indians just a bunch bastardize mutants?

^ indians ave offered their women to all willingly... during the Afghan reign truck load of women used to get transpoed to kabul for a good working out

^^ Like the truckloads of pashtun women being phucked by punjabi phuckistanis, Northern alliance, russians, US, NATO etc etc etc?




colours of Kaziranga

keep dreamin boy dreamin...


reality is and your history is that OTHERS fought and ruled over you... YOU WERE THE HELPLESS WHORE... Never ever even offered ANY resistance to Turks Afghans and Persians and THEN WAS RULED BY BRITIHS FOR 200 YEARS WITH YOUR LEGS WIDE OPEN... EVEN MOST OF YOUR CITIES HAVE TURKISH, MUSLIM AND BRITISH NAMES... LIKE BOMBAY... ETC...

dosent matter youve learnt ENGLISH indian...u people have always been slaves and only 60 years have passed that ur free but...u people and ur slavish instinct need much more than sixty years to change



and this is the reminder of Turkish and Pathan 1000 yr rule... ENGRAVED IN STONE

look how Babur and Afghans told their ppl to come and take what they can and these Indians are not men who can defend... lol

One Thousand years of Turko-Pathan supremacy in Hindustan

The spread of Islam in the tribal belt dates back to the rise of the Turkish dynasty in Ghazni from about 960 AD. Mahmud of Ghazni conquered and incorporated areas of the subcontinent up to Lahore. Ghorid Sultan Muizzuddin Muhammad, with his headquarters in Ghor, subdued the north part of the subcontinent and was the founder of Muslim supremacy in Delhi in 1206. The fall of the Ghorids was followed by successive incursions of various forces from Central Asia. The most notable of these were those of conquerors Genghis Khan in 1221 and of Timur in 1398.

The tribesmen formed the spearhead of the Muslim penetration and conquest of India, first as soldiers of fortune and later as powerful kings, even as sultans and emperors.[citation needed] The Turks were a small band of chosen favourites; the soldiers, and later the rulers, were Ghaljis or Pathans.[citation needed] Apart from the Turks, i.e. Ghaznavids (1001-1186), Ghorids (1186-1290), and Tughlaqs (1321-1451), three Pathan dynasties, i.e., Khaljis (1290-1321), Lodis (1451-1526) and Suris (1539-55), had sat on the throne of Delhi. But their authority did not extend over the tribal belt. Babur, the conqueror of India and founder of the Mughal dynasty, wrote of the empire of Lodis that its writ did not run effectively west of the Indus, and it had no control over the Afghan or Pathan homelands from which its rulers had originally come.[citation needed]

The Pathan dynasties who ruled in India attracted many frontiersmen to their banners."[citation needed] The firman (royal edict) of Bahlol Lodhi (1451-1489), the ruler of Delhi, encouraging frontier tribes of the northwest to take service in Delhi stated:

Hindustan can best be held by somebody who rules over a nation with tribes. Let every Afghan tribesman bring his relatives leading a life of indigence, let them come and take up estates in Hind, relieving themselves from straitened circumstances, and supporting the State against powerful enemies.[citation needed]

The declining flow of Pathan warriors from the tribal belt may be one of the important causes of their downfall.[citation needed] The lack of support became obvious after the death of Sher Shah Suri in 1555.

MIGHTY PASHTUN KID CRYING




colours of Kaziranga

hey kids cry...

but Indian soldiers get whacked by pakis... big size 9 in the face.. and INDIAN FALLS AND WEE'S IN HIS PANTIES... check the vid...!!!!

somebody must have told this pashtun kid that the warlord he has been sold to doesnt use lunricants




colours of Kaziranga

paki punajbis have 1/10000 jatt blood and even then they make you polish their shoes. imagine if you met a real jatt

and who are you to decide?
It would sound better if its "indian punjabis having only 0.00001 jatt blood left after getting ****ed by hindus everywhere, including the golden temple

Hell all indian jokes have to include a sikh to make it funny

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------