I was reading HBN's thread in the main forum and it reminded me to post this. I was actually thinking about this a while back, but never could get bothered to post it.
But anyway, seeing how European goverments seem unwilling to stop the third world invasion and colonization of our nations, we can expect some really rough sailing in the future. As the number of third worlders rises exponentially and the number of Europeans exponentially declines, some countries might arrive at the point, even before the midway of this century, where the native population becomes a minority. Seeing how agressive and inflexible the third worlders, especially Muslims, are even now, when they are so relatively few, this might threaten the very existance of Europeans as a free people in their own countries. Thus having in your posession a method which by a stroke will eliminate or "seriously reduce" the the threat is a good insurance policy, not to mention a good deterrant. I would venture that not too many third worlders would dare spill out in the streets and rape and pillage if they knew that the consequence would be slow death by hemorrhagic fever.
This would be scientifically feasible. Unlike the Jew and the Arab, the European and the third world immigrant are genetically unique in at least some areas, even if those areas might not necessarily show up in the phenotype. Certainly this is true between the African, both Sub-Saharan and Northern, and the Northern European. Therefore it would theoretically be feasible to engineer a virus that becomes active only when certain combinations of conditions are met.
What makes this idea even more compelling is that it might actually happen, that is these sorts of weapons could be developed by private organizations in the West under the guise of being "biotech" companies. Obviously the governments of Europe show no interest in protecting their own people against the third world invasion and likely takeover. As more and more people in Europe realize the looming disaster, you might well see some like minded souls get together and conduct some "research" in the labs of a biotech startup somewhere in Europe. Today this seems like a formidable task, but in 30 years the technology will have advanced so far that this kind of simple genetic manipulation will seem to be childs play, and it will be possible to CREATE totally new viruses and bacteria for the purpose of attacking only very specific genotypes.
The possibilities offered by biotechnology is the main reason why I am majoring in biochemistry
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
November 29 2006, 5:54 PM
GE Biological "Ethnic" Weapons Loom on the Horizon
Date: Thu, Jan 21, 1999
By Patricia Reaney
LONDON (Reuters) - Biological and genetic weapons designed to kill
specific ethnic or racial groups are no longer the stuff of science
fiction, British researchers said Thursday.
A designer plague that would only kill Serbs or a toxin engineered to
affect Israelis or Kurds does not exist yet but advances in biotechnology
and the mapping of all human genes could be misused to develop lethal
weapons within five to 10 years.
Dr Vivienne Nathanson, the head of health policy research at the
British Medical Association (BMA), said genetic information is already
being used to enhance biological weapons.
"It would be a tragedy if in 10 years time the world faces the reality
of genetically engineered and possibly genetically targeted weapons," she
told a news conference to launch a new book entitled "Biotechnology Weapons
and Humanity."
"It is not technology and information that is available today, but it
is becoming increasingly available. We do have a window of opportunity
before weapons of that type are manufactured to make sure we have effective
measures of prevention."
The book by Professor Malcolm Dando, of the Department of Peace
Studies at the University of Bradford in northern England, paints a
terrifying picture of the power of biological weapons.
The release of 220 pounds of anthrax spores from canisters planted in
a major city could wipe out up to three million people.
The book traces the history of the development and use of biological
weapons and warns that scientific knowledge has been exploited in the past
and is likely to be misused in the future unless international action is
taken.
"We believe biological weapons will become an increasing weapon in
terrorist activity," said Nathanson. "An ethnically targeted weapon becomes
more of a reality."
The designer weapon works on a similar principle to gene therapy but
instead of replacing faulty genes that don't work it exploits genetic
variations to target its victims.
For example, micro-organisms could be genetically engineered to attack
known receptor sites on the cell membrane or viruses could be targeted at
specific DNA sequences inside cells.
William Assche, the chairman of the BMA's board of science and
education, said the report is designed to raise public, medical and
political awareness about the dangers of biological weapons.
It urges the international community to strengthen the 1972 Biological
and Toxin Weapons Convention to improve verification procedures. It also
calls on doctors and scientists to protect the integrity of their work and
to monitor the potential use of genome mapping.
"Getting rid of weapons once they are produced is very difficult.
Governments may be reluctant to give up weapons that the rest of the world
find unacceptable. Terrorists certainly will be," said Nathanson.
"We still have the chance to strengthen the ban on these weapons. We
must do so now and we must make sure the ban is policed effectively."
REUTERS
.
Anonymous (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
November 30 2006, 4:30 PM
Certainly if I manage to build a successful biotech startup I might pursue this kind of research as a "hobby" on the side lol.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 2 2006, 6:05 PM
One should develop weapons that close specifically the mouth of nazi-minded people like you, notan.
GOD does not enjoin you from befriending those who do not fight you because of religion, and do not evict you from your homes. You may befriend them and be equitable towards them. GOD loves the equitable. [sura 60, verse 8]
GOD enjoins you only from befriending those who fight you because of religion, evict you from your homes, and band together with others to banish you. You shall not befriend them. Those who befriend them are the transgressors. [sura 60, verse 9]
This message has been edited by zephir22 on Dec 2, 2006 6:06 PM
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 3 2006, 8:57 PM
so what's the plan, the Arabs getting uppity, we release a genetic bio weapon, the Arabs die, but so does half the population of southern Italy and a **** load of Spaniards?....lot's of mixing there you know, impractical idea
[IMG][/IMG]
How's it hanging Kofi?
Faugh a Ballaugh!
Drink to the dead all you still alive
We shall join them in good time
Should you go crossin' that silvery brook
It's best to leap before you look
Anonymous (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 4 2006, 4:36 PM
Nowhere did I sat it has to be lethal lol. Just give the rioting turd worlders a bad case of the flu to calm them down for a bit lol. I don't see how this would be any different from weapons being developed by the US which rely on crowd control through the "microwave effect." It is exactly the same, except much better to counter a citywide insurrection as opposed to a localized mob.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 4 2006, 4:49 PM
What makes this idea even more compelling is that it might actually happen, that is these sorts of weapons could be developed by private organizations in the West under the guise of being "biotech" companies. Obviously the governments of Europe show no interest in protecting their own people against the third world invasion and likely takeover. As more and more people in Europe realize the looming disaster, you might well see some like minded souls get together and conduct some "research" in the labs of a biotech startup somewhere in Europe. Today this seems like a formidable task, but in 30 years the technology will have advanced so far that this kind of simple genetic manipulation will seem to be childs play, and it will be possible to CREATE totally new viruses and bacteria for the purpose of attacking only very specific genotypes.
First, try to get good marks in high school, and try to discovered more things about DNA and see how stupid you looks
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 4 2006, 5:10 PM
lol, I'm in college, and in fact I got marks in the top on half of one percent. You should be the last one calling anyone stupid, as even your own compatriots on this forum consider you to be an annoying little girl.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 8 2006, 2:31 PM
why am I so disturbed thinking Mr Big Panda would be simply envious of such a thing ?
Anonymous (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 8 2006, 4:49 PM
Oh yeah, and if we can make them ethnicity specific, then it would surely be child's play to make them gender specific. So we can get rid of only immigrant males, and leave the females! Now, if we could also only figure out how to leave only the hot females....
J/K
.
nappyheadedHO (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 24 2007, 12:52 AM
LONDON (AP) -- Israel is trying to identity genes carried only by Arabs that could be used to develop a biological weapon that would harm Arabs but not Jews, the Sunday Times reported.
The newspaper attributed its report to unidentified Israeli military and Western intelligence sources. It said Israeli scientists are working to create a genetically modified bacterium or virus that only attacks people who carry certain genes.
The paper said the weapon is seen as Israel's response to the threat of chemical and biological warfare from Iraq and could be spread by air or through the water supply.
The newspaper said the program is based at the biological institute in Nes Tziyona, which it described as the main research facility for Israel's chemical and biological weapons. According to the report, researchers have pinpointed ``a characteristic in the genetic profile of certain Arab communities, particularly the Iraqi people.''
The idea of such research has provoked controversy in Israel because of parallels with the genetic experiments at Auschwitz by Nazi scientist Dr. Josef Mengele during World War II, the paper said.
``Morally, based on our history, and our tradition and our experience, such a weapon is monstrous and should be denied,'' Israeli parliament member Dedi Zucker is quoted as saying.
Officials at Porton Down, Britain's biological defense facility, said such weapons were theoretically possible, the newspaper said
If we are to believe a recent AP report culled from the Sunday Times (London) it would appear that the Israelis have announced or intentionally leaked a report that its military was considering the development of so-called "ethnic weapons." The info is credited to "unidentified Israeli military and Western intelligence sources" which generally brings up the red flags with regard to authenticity, and more likely, the motive for such leaks. The article ends with a comment from an unnamed source at Britain's "biological defense facility" that pathogens which can kill on the basis of ethnicity are "theoretically possible."
This PR seemingly ignores the fact that this "theoretical possibility" was recognized over 25 years ago, if not before. It was originally brought to the attention of potential customers with the publication of an article in the Military Review of November 1970. This journal for command-level military personnel was published by the US Army Command and General Staff College in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The feature, entitled "Ethnic Weapons," authored by Carl A. Larson, outlines the history, desirability, and possibilities of engineered biological pathogens which would affect only those races which historically have no natural defense against certain "enzyme inhibitors." Larson is listed as head of the "Department of Human Genetics at the Institute of Genetics, Lund, Sweden" as well as a licensed physician. The Hippocratic oath was apparently not administered in Sweden when Larson received his accreditation.
Larson explains that many of the chemical activities and functions within the human body are caused by the interactions of enzymes. One of the more significant activities enabled by enzyme chemical reactions are the contraction and relaxation of muscle tissue. If the activities of these enzymes are blocked, the victim will be paralyzed, even to the point of death by asphyxiation. Not coincidentally, the enzyme-blocking action of compounds called organophosphates were discovered in Germany in the 1930s when experimental insecticides killed the people unlucky enough to have used them. This discovery led to the mass production of a substance named "Trilon," later used to impressive effect in the extermination of groups of people the Nazis considered little more than insects. This substance and others of similar makeup became known as "nerve gas." A concentration of 40 milligrams per cubic meter can kill in about 10 minutes. Stronger agents were later developed which can do the job with a single drop on the skin.
The author points out that genetic variation between races is mirrored in concurrent differences in tolerance for various substances. As an example, it has been noted that large segments of southeast Asian populations historically display a lactose intolerance, due to the near absence of the enzyme lactase in the digestive system. A chemical or biological weapon (CBW) which takes advantage of this genetic variance could conceivably kill or incapacitate entire populations, leaving invading armies relatively unscathed, as long as they are ethnically homogenous, or the at-risk members had at least been prepared to tolerate the attack. In effect, the poison or viruses would not be recognized by their bodies.
The Sunday Times article states that Israeli researchers have "pinpointed 'a characteristic in the genetic profile of certain Arab communities, particularly the Iraqi people.'" This may be more palatable to westerners, since some consider the Iraqi race the enemy, and excluding other Arab gene pools might seem like a more "humane" way to carry on more studies.
Larson is even more explicit in a way that would probably never make it into the mainstream press. In a passage that would make Doctor Strangelove proud, he muses uncontrollably on the possibilities of genetically-sensitive chemicals to subdue enemy populations: "Friendly forces would discriminatingly use incapacitants in entangled situations to give friend and foe a short period of enforced rest to sort them out. By gentle persuasion, aided by psychochemicals, civilians in enemy cities could be reeducated. The adversary would use incapacitants to spare those whom he could use for slaves." This was published in a serious, staid professional journal read by US military strategists. He concludes with the statement that "the functions of life [now] lie bare to attack."
According to Charles Piller and Keith Yamamoto in their 1988 book Gene Wars, Larson's article was the first time that the subject of ethnically targeted CBWs was broached publicly, and that in "the military's private circles it was old news." The authors further state that in 1951 the Mechanicsburg, PA Naval Supply Depot was the site of a classified test using a benign organism delivered to personnel to mimic the behavior of an actual bioweapon: "According to documents declassified in the late 1970s, the site was chosen because 'Within this system there are employed large numbers of laborers, including many Negroes, whose incapacitation would seriously affect the operation of the supply system.'" The black workers in the Depot were supposedly more susceptible to a strain of Valley Fever than were whites, but instead of using the actual virus, a substitute fungal organism was used. Valley Fever is more often fatal to blacks than to whites. It was recently revealed that the truth and reconciliation hearings in South Africa had presented witnesses who testified that scientists working for the apartheid regime had pursued efforts along similar lines.
Another possible example of field testing of ethnic weapons (or at least an interesting case for study by those interested in their development) may be the famed "Four Corners" virus, which seems only to affect Native Americans living in northern New Mexico and Arizona. Most reports identified or compared the disease to the Hantavirus, which killed victims relatively quickly following the occurrence of a prolonged fever and fluid which rapidly filled the lungs and asphyxiated the patient. Supposedly contracted through deer mice droppings, the mystery disease has claimed at least a dozen victims in the last ten years. The most recent outbreak occured this last summer, coming on the heels of El Nińo, which the major news media blamed for the renewed threat. Some area residents believe that the virus may have been released either accidentally or intentionally from a bioweapons cache at Fort Wingate, an army facility a few miles east of Gallup. The munitions storage at Wingate is now officially closed.
In the 28 intervening years since the Military Review article was published, the study of genetics has advanced to levels undreamed of by Dr. Larson at the time. The human genome project is slated to map all locations and functions of human DNA by early in the next century. There may be little reason to doubt that subtly selective and perhaps overtly unnoticeable biological agents can be introduced into a native population simply by flying over a chosen area with little more than a crop duster attached to the wings of a B52. The recent revelation that Israel may be working on their own bioagent based on well-known and tested principles may only be a psychological deterrent, but given the well-documented history of ethnic weapons, there is ample reason to suspect that the threat is not an idle one.
Hmm, a gene specific only to Arabs...interesting. lol
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 24 2007, 9:25 AM
The Germans have an easy job:
Just poison the döner kebabs and all Turks will die like cockroaches
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
And destroy the only working Turkish industry in Germany ? By the way food is one of the Areas where immigration is really positive and healthy. Especially if you dont like German Food to much.
When it comes to food im a very strange mixture of Asian, Turk and American that would make Uncle Adolf turn in his grave
---------------------------------------------
A German Soldier doesnt die, he goes to hell and regroups !
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 24 2007, 10:15 AM
all i heard is those weapons are not impossible to make and i expect everything from europans. whatever, europan problem is not immigrants, their problem is now they are elders union. they forgot to make children when working like ants.
nappyheadedHO (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 24 2007, 10:13 PM
Seriously though, the potential of "ethnic bullet" bioweapons is nearly endless. They can be used not only in population control in "diverse" nations, but also in warfare. Just imagine the possibilities. An invading army preparing to invade a distant land could unleash a bioweapon designed to affect only the specific genotype of the target nation and its close neighbors, leaving its own men unaffected. This would surmount the principal obstacle to using biological agents as intruments of warfare: their indiscriminancy and impossibility to control once unleashed.
Furthermone, the agent would not have to be lethal. As technology advances, it will become possible to tailor make viruses and bacteria to produce the exact effects desired. So, for an invasion, a very bad case of diarrhea lasting a week induced by a modified cholera bacterium would severely diminish the enemy's ability to resist while the invading army advances. This would actually REDUCE casualties, on both sides, so its really hard to think up LOGICAL (as opposed to idealogical) reasons to ban these sorts of weapons.
But, as far as I am concerned, the greatest potential of this sort of technology is to preserve the native populations of Europe as masters of their own nations. If our governments refuse to take care of our security, then in the future individuals will have to take that role upon themselves.
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
This message has been edited by notanonymous on Sep 24, 2007 10:16 PM
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 25 2007, 1:59 AM
and notan said he went to a crappy school..so I suppose getting marks that high isn't as hard as you might imagine..
but sure let notan do it...he might figure a anti negro or arab gene..and then kill himself with it during testing...oh the irony if that were to happen...
at his last minute..he will realize that indeed his grandmother did sleep with an african...then be happy that he killed himself because he was the product of race-mixing..
seriously though..crazy wild fantasies like this is probably what gets him through the day...he said so himself he hangs out with a bunch of eastern european immigrants...
that has social reject written all over his stupid ass...
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
September 25 2007, 2:19 AM
lol, do you think I am going to develop this sort of technology? You gotta be kidding me, do you know how much squinting at different genomes for years this would involve? Even with software, perfecting this kind of technology would involve years of brain-numbing research. I'd go nearsighted and cross eyed doing that s.hit lol. Not to mention that there wouldn't be too much money involved. There would be no way to sell Arab-targeting bioweapons to Arab terrorists, lol. Nah, if I were in any way involved, it would be as a financier. By the times this technology is mature and thus within reach of small research organizations, I will be in my late thirties or early forties, and hopefully pretty wealthy. What better use to put my money to than developing an insurance policy for my people? lol.
But you're right though, I have to go to a less crappy school. I've been in contact with a few Wall Street guys, and they all told me that if I want to land a position at a bulge bracket bank, then, barring an act of god, i need to go to another school. I'm going to transfer after this my sophomore year, I dunno where yet.
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
October 3 2007, 7:18 PM
The use of such weapons would rid us of the presence of entities such as the infamous Saifudeen.
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
October 5 2007, 9:31 PM
bump
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
November 27 2007, 3:43 PM
The Turd worlders are asking for it, I tell you. They are calling to us "kill us, kill us, kill us." Just look at what is happening in France, AGAIN. They are asking us to end their meaningless lives and put a finish to their misery. It will happen.
Onward Chartered Soldiers, on to heathen lands,
Prayer books in your pockets, rifles in your hands.
Take the glorious tidings where trade can be done,
Spread the peaceful gospel --- with a Maxim gun.
Tell the wretched natives, sinful are their hearts,
Turn their heathen temples into spirit marts.
And if to your teaching they will not succumb,
Give them another sermon with the Maxim gun...
When the Ten Commandments they quite understand,
You their Chief must hocus, and annex their land;
And if they misguided call you to account,
Give them another sermon --- with a Maxim from the Mount
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
November 28 2007, 4:24 PM
This is not a very good idea.
One reason might be that it would be equally possible to grab a hold of this technology and apply it the other way too. If you have studied the behaviour of, say the British establishment, and then handed them this ethno-weapon, ready to use, just to be adjusted to the genetic pattern of the desired groups to target, are you quite sure they'd be interested in exterminating people from the third world?
If this weapon could be really fine-tuned, don't you think the british establisment would instead use it on their own white working class population instead of on negroes and pakis? Particularly the part of the white working class that doesn't agree with them? Meaning probably the most part.
This leads us to the other reason for this idea to be bad. It wasn't the third-worlders who forced themselfes into our countries, someone brought them in. Or looked the other way when they entered our countries illegally. There's your crook.
According to scientists, the need to have people agreeing with you is biological. So is the need to control your surroundings by introducing a pleasing "order". Adjust your viruses to look for representatives carrying these two genetic traits to an extreme degree, and you'll be able to single out every Angela Merkel ("No tolerance for the intolerants!") or Tony Blair ("Cool Britannia") in this world, and of course, kill them.
Also bear in mind that soon, very soon, India, Japan and China will be ahead of Europe in designing these little beauties. As long as we're friends with them, everything is nice and fine. But should a conflict arise, we in Europe will be on the receiving end of this weapon. If they kill, say a third of us, and want to enslave the rest, who do you think they'll use as "capos" to oversee us? Disgruntled minorities that would get artificially priviledged, like in all of history.
Our problem is that we're intellectually lazy and without ideals. Except the Trotsky ones, anti-racism and anti-antisemitism. Trotsky of course was a Jew, or Semite, and was at the time considered a separate race from ordinary Russians or Europeans. It was very natural for him to be fighting ideas that were against him and his tribe. The rest of the anti-racists and anti-antisemitists are nothing but what Trotsky described in his own words as "useful idiots". Or, if you will, Angela Merkel, Tony Blair et al.
If I'd be interested in exterminating fools, instead of designing odd viruses, I'd be posing as their friend and give them really bad advice. Like, women should compete with men in the career market, instead of giving birth to children. Or, marriage should be allowed to anyone, man and man, woman and woman, man and goat, woman and boulder, etc. The more encouragement of perversion, the less children making.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
November 30 2007, 7:17 PM
wont work against arabs, we hav mixed with so many ppls its ridiculus, plus arabs r not one pure race we r a mixture of many races depending on where ur looking,
Northafrican arabs r mixture of Berber, Arab, Turk, Numbian...
Lavent Arabs r a mixture of Assyrian, Arab, Turk, Chaldonian...
may only work against the gulf arabs like the saudis, yemenis, qataris, cus they r the only pure arabs genetically, and then again the arabs share a very close genetic link to our semetic cousins the jew...also i can garantee u that atlest half of europe has Arab genes if not more...u ever watch the programe, ''where are you from'' or somthing like that, so many english ppl took blood tests and found out that they had atklest 10% blood trace with North africa or middle east, You know Margret Thatcher former lady priminster of England actually had a 25% Trace to arabs from the iraqi/saud region!!!!!!
these bio weapons wont work with highly mixed races, like the turks or arabs, who hav mixed so much with so many differant ppls they colonised, no two arab states has the same gene traces as with maybe Sub-sahran africans or Chinese.
Europe has no hope for the future, its slowly becoming the Islamic Republic of Eurabia, stop having wet dreams and accept ur fate...
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 1 2007, 6:48 PM
Instead of going down to this path why not doing better research in developing robots to replace all need for immigrants and some technology which de-islamise the brain of dumb muslims and turcos ? Brain transplanting could be also another way.
This will eradicate any threat from these scums for sure. )
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 2 2007, 1:18 AM
camel rider????, coming from a greek??? a ppl whose passed times was beastialtiy (thats right greeks used to fvck moutain goats) and Gay orgy's, yes now i am offended, i will be honest with u, i could never care less wat a goat fvcking GAYreek thinks...As hairy as a monkey, as pale as a diseased rat, and as greecy as a Roma Gypsy...wouldnt blame u for taking ur anger out on us...
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 16 2008, 2:04 AM
Well, I have gotten a spot in a lab researching genetic recombination in pathogenic bacteria.This is actually pretty awesome, it's as close to doing bioweapons research as you can get without actually doing bioweapons research lol. The group I'll be working in is focusing on transformation of pneumonia causing bacteria. What the research is about is pretty much doing genetic recombination and inserting various genes into the bacteria, such as antibiotic resistance genes, in order to try to figure out how recombination works on the molecular level. The great part about this is that I'll be doing a lot of the laboraty techniques that you don't learn in the classroom, so I'll learn how to culture bacteria and especially how to carry out the techniques of inserting specific genes of interest and having them be expressed. The place I'll be doing it is a brand new $60 million research facility in the Chicago medical district. Of course, the professor in charge of the lab is a jew. lol. Still, this will definitely give me useful skills for the future. lol.
F.uck an eye for an eye. You take my eye, and I will kill you, and all those you care about. That is our policy.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 16 2008, 3:11 AM
"the professor in charge of the lab is a jew."
Wonder what he would think of your wet fantasies about this weapon =)
ROFL, the thought of poor racially superior white notan being dominated by a Jewish boss, while day dreaming about an ethnic weapon is just too much. ROFLMAO.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 16 2008, 10:49 AM
hmmmm, i made a search about such weapons. it's almost impossible to make such weapons in biochemical ways, maybe %0.00000001. but they'll be avaible with nano-tech. but my search was so amateur (i don't have so many genetical engineer friend).
however it'll be still risky to operate them because of races are mixed with each other. so pure race supremacists will be easier targets for such weapons. i think bio-terrorism will be the next nightmare of human race. anybody watched Cowboy Bebop: Knocking on Heaven's Door?
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 16 2008, 6:15 PM
There's an easier way to get rid of the turds (of all races): open a few "NO WORK FREE MONEY, ONLY PERSONS WITH REAL IDENTITY CARDS ARE ACCEPTED" centers where you poison them.
Mobile airpower
"The enemy dies relaxed," observed a Lockheed Martin manager.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 17 2008, 6:46 AM
"Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?"
by times its developeds europs femals have fvkked horses dildos arabs sheikhs animals africans pakis turkeys iranian all other world including latin american argentinan except chinegulks and europa faggetry homosexual parades 'men'
its mean only chinegulks to being eliminateds?
===========================================
I am old Christiankiller
Sorry for offensive to our good religion christian brothers
I am not hating christians
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 18 2008, 11:23 PM
Actually such weapons can be produced easily. The human genom has been mapped precisely so you can use microorganisms or virus-populations as vectors, that inherit specific informations (DNA/RNA) to encode for enzyms that can harm or change specific DNA-regions or you can express anti-genes that would lead to an extreme immune-reaction. Every race has its specific DNA-coded receptors on T or B-cells which can be used as target-sites for synthetic coded antigens that can be brought in by vectors into the host(Virus/Bacteria). Another way is to replace working essential genes by mutated or "faulty" genes as mentioned in the text above. Every race has its variable genotyp for these specific regions and can be used as target sides for "DNA-Replacement".
---------------------------------
Searching for the PKK scum...
This message has been edited by eddy85 on Dec 18, 2008 11:24 PM
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 19 2008, 6:42 PM
^^Exactly. The real challenge is to scan the genomes and pick out polymorphisms that have a very high specificity to different ethnic groups. Once you have these sequences, you can design a viral genome that will only integrate into the host cell genome if these polymorphisms are present. So you can use a retrovirus, for example, since these viruses cannot replicate until their DNA is integrated into the host genome. You then modify its genome so that a) it's lethal and b) it can only integrate to genomes that contain certain polymorphisms, and voila, you have yourself a perfectly functional ethnicity specific bioweap. The only roadblock at this point is that so few genomes have been sequenced that it's not possible to identify polymorphisms as belonging to specific groups. However, in 10-15 years, millions of genomes will have been sequenced. Then you'll just need to gather the data (this might be difficult, not for scientific but legal reasons) and run them through simple pattern recognition software to find these polymorphisms. Once you have that, you're set.
F.uck an eye for an eye. You take my eye, and I will kill you, and all those you care about. That is our policy.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 21 2008, 6:10 PM
Notan, even by your standards this is sick.
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
------------------------------
nappyheadedHO (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 6:08 PM
lol, how so? At the very least it's no more sick than the people who gave us half a century of MAD, and honestly that wasn't sick at all, just reality.
F.uck an eye for an eye. You take my eye, and I will kill you, and all those you care about. That is our policy.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 7:53 PM
And you confuse Mutual Assured Destruction with "ethnicity-specific bioweapons" how exactly?
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 7:59 PM
By the way notan, it's always good to keep in mind, that if things really get bad, there will always be people like me to take care of people like you. Don't get me wrong, this is not a threat or anything, it's like ying vs yang, or good vs evil, allies vs axis, etc. I'm your counterbalance. Or to put it simply: you will never achieve victory.
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 8:58 PM
I am constantly baffled by some peoples hatred, thankfully they are almost always in the minority and in rare instances when they do reach the majority their hatred makes sure that they never last very long.
Anyways it cant be fun being a racist in today's multi racial society.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 10:22 PM
LOL, yeah I'm guessing it must be really tiring? If they'd stop blaming others for their shortcomings and put all this time and energy into something positive, they'd be kings by now.
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
------------------------------
nappyheadedHO (Login notanonymous) Elite WAFF Vet Club
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 22 2008, 10:57 PM
And you confuse Mutual Assured Destruction with "ethnicity-specific bioweapons" how exactly?
That's a poorly phrased question, there is no confusion involved here, besides maybe your own. I'll try to explain this in a simple way you may be able to understand. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union built, stockpiled, and made plans for the use of thousands of thermonuclear weapons, mostly targeted at population centers. This was done in order to provide security against destruction by the enemy, even though the idea involved the horrible deaths of hundreds of millions of civilians through burns and radiation sickness.
Same with the bioweapons. This time the idea is to prevent the destruction, enslavement, oppression, or what have you, of "white people" as they become minorities within their own nations. Bad things tend to befall minorities, today's affirmative action West nothwistanding. If MAD was justifiable in order to prevent the destruction of the group of people classified by the term "American" or "Soviet," something akin to MAD is justifiable to ensure the survival of people classified by the term "white." It's basic logic here my man, or if not then go ahead and point out the fallacy. Hell, this is MAD except that the "mutually" part may be missing, but if anything that makes it even more justifiable than MAD was. "Ethnically targeted bioweapons" are no more evil than nukes. Nukes were good for the Cold War because the two adversaries were separated and defined by geographical location. Ethnically specific bioweapons are good the future situation because the potential adversaries share the same geographical locations but are defined by their...ethnicity. It's that simple, really. There is no evilness involved here, just basic survival instincts, the same that drove MAD.
By the way notan, it's always good to keep in mind, that if things really get bad, there will always be people like me to take care of people like you. Don't get me wrong, this is not a threat or anything, it's like ying vs yang, or good vs evil, allies vs axis, etc. I'm your counterbalance. Or to put it simply: you will never achieve victory.
Save the drama for yo mama.
F.uck an eye for an eye. You take my eye, and I will kill you, and all those you care about. That is our policy.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 23 2008, 12:08 AM
what happen to progeny of nordics in bordellos? its future of westners europs? is they being target too?
===========================================
I am old Christiankiller
Sorry for offensive to our good religion christian brothers
I am not hating christians
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 23 2008, 4:53 AM
Wow, this is actually a possible plan that could work... I heard the Isrealis were working something on this to only attack the "PAlestinian Arab" DNA.
Just make sure to leave Iranians out of this mass biological weapon Notan,am counting on you....Except the selfhating ones...they deserve to die :D
--------------------------
Am not Malaysian...
This message has been edited by fightclub20 on Dec 23, 2008 4:54 AM
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 23 2008, 12:53 PM
"LOL, yeah I'm guessing it must be really tiring? If they'd stop blaming others for their shortcomings and put all this time and energy into something positive, they'd be kings by now.
LOL If only dumb people where smart =) The world would be a happier place, I am just glad that certain stupid ideas are usually confined to the few.
------------------------------
"That's a poorly phrased question, there is no confusion involved here, besides maybe your own. I'll try to explain this in a simple way you may be able to understand. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union built, stockpiled, and made plans for the use of thousands of thermonuclear weapons, mostly targeted at population centers. This was done in order to provide security against destruction by the enemy, even though the idea involved the horrible deaths of hundreds of millions of civilians through burns and radiation sickness.
Same with the bioweapons. This time the idea is to prevent the destruction, enslavement, oppression, or what have you, of "white people" as they become minorities within their own nations. Bad things tend to befall minorities, today's affirmative action West nothwistanding. If MAD was justifiable in order to prevent the destruction of the group of people classified by the term "American" or "Soviet," something akin to MAD is justifiable to ensure the survival of people classified by the term "white." It's basic logic here my man, or if not then go ahead and point out the fallacy. Hell, this is MAD except that the "mutually" part may be missing, but if anything that makes it even more justifiable than MAD was. "Ethnically targeted bioweapons" are no more evil than nukes. Nukes were good for the Cold War because the two adversaries were separated and defined by geographical location. Ethnically specific bioweapons are good the future situation because the potential adversaries share the same geographical locations but are defined by their...ethnicity. It's that simple, really. There is no evilness involved here, just basic survival instincts, the same that drove MAD."
ROFLMAO, sorry buddy haven't laughed this hard in a while actually helped wake me up thanks =) , you know i am not even sure at this point if you are serious, in thinking that what you just wrote makes sense. You do realize that the "oppression" you speak off will be carried out through love in the very distant future maybe 10000+ years from now IF even then . Also I hope that you do realize that the majority of white people do not view people with different skin colors as adversaries just because of their darker skin tone which is quite a different situation from MAD, where you had a very real threat of nukes+communism to hold back... here you have an imaginary threat in the minds of a few paranoid people like yourself.
Honestly buddy are you yanking our chain? and let me guess you would engineer the virus to spare all the hot colored chicks =) and only kill off the powerful black man, the biggest threat and adversary to the powerful white man ROFL.
Good thing this is all nothing but a white supremacists wet dream =)
P.S notan buddy I suggest for your own sake that you try to move past these hateful idea, I think you might find yourself living a happier life. shrug
-----------------------------------
@Fightclub
LMAO so fightclub buddy you are Iranianguy/Angryiranian after all =) Welcome back mate I knew you couldn't keep away, but don't feel bad WAFF is an interesting place I DO understand.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 23 2008, 4:21 PM
You can laugh all you want dude, but in no way did you refute the logic behind my comparison between MAD and this thread. As for the things you did say, they are just bogus.
You do realize that the "oppression" you speak off will be carried out through love in the very distant future maybe 10000+ years from now IF even then
I got NO idea what the first part is about but as far as the timeframe you cite, it's absurd. Whites will become minorities within their own nations in, at most, 50 years. They will become minorities of the active (ie non geezer) population much earlier than that.
Also I hope that you do realize that the majority of white people do not view people with different skin colors as adversaries just because of their darker skin tone
Ain't that the truth! But the problem arises because while whites may have "learned" to look beyond tribes, other tribes haven't. Non whites see the world very much in a "my tribe your tribe" basis. The constant harping for special privilages emanating from every single minority group in the West should be proof enough of this. Today, when they are 10% of the population, these ethnic minorities are demanding preferential treatment by (mostly) "peaceful means". Their numbers will increase dramatically over the next several decades, as will their power. It tends to happen that as groups become more powerful their demands increase proportionately, as does the aggression behind the demands. And, as history has SHOWN NUMEROUS TIMES, if a group becomes too weak, it often is destroyed. Hell, aren't we Westerners told ad infinitum (or rather ad nauseam) that we can never allow the lessons of the holocaust to be forgotten? I'm not going to forget them, nor the fuken neanderthals for that matter.
F.uck an eye for an eye. You take my eye, and I will kill you, and all those you care about. That is our policy.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 24 2008, 4:34 AM
//
I am constantly baffled by some peoples hatred, thankfully they are almost always in the minority and in rare instances when they do reach the majority their hatred makes sure that they never last very long.
Anyways it cant be fun being a racist in today's multi racial society.
//
Today's "multi racial society" only exists in the west. It doesn't exist anywhere else.
That's it's ultimate fault. When European Christians start settling the rest of the world.. then it'l be multi-culturalism, until then.. it's invasion.. perpetuated by traitors, who will be dealt with in good time.
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 24 2008, 10:17 AM
That's a poorly phrased question, there is no confusion involved here, besides maybe your own. I'll try to explain this in a simple way you may be able to understand. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union built, stockpiled, and made plans for the use of thousands of thermonuclear weapons, mostly targeted at population centers. This was done in order to provide security against destruction by the enemy, even though the idea involved the horrible deaths of hundreds of millions of civilians through burns and radiation sickness.
Same with the bioweapons. This time the idea is to prevent the destruction, enslavement, oppression, or what have you, of "white people" as they become minorities within their own nations. Bad things tend to befall minorities, today's affirmative action West nothwistanding. If MAD was justifiable in order to prevent the destruction of the group of people classified by the term "American" or "Soviet," something akin to MAD is justifiable to ensure the survival of people classified by the term "white." It's basic logic here my man, or if not then go ahead and point out the fallacy. Hell, this is MAD except that the "mutually" part may be missing, but if anything that makes it even more justifiable than MAD was. "Ethnically targeted bioweapons" are no more evil than nukes. Nukes were good for the Cold War because the two adversaries were separated and defined by geographical location. Ethnically specific bioweapons are good the future situation because the potential adversaries share the same geographical locations but are defined by their...ethnicity. It's that simple, really. There is no evilness involved here, just basic survival instincts, the same that drove MAD.
==
At least you make no secret of your ignorance. Guess, I have to respect that in some way. The USA and the USSR had nuclear stockpiles in order to "defend" one ideology against the other. It wasn't meant to protect one ethnicity against another ethnicity.
But, I have to admit, your absolute delusion is drawing my interst. How would you define an ethnicity and very importantly, how would you rank it? And once that is established is mere ethnicity sufficient to have a person exterminated, or are there other factors that come into play? E.g. if a Pakistani is more useful to society than you (which shouldn't be very hard), would you be willing to set an example and kill yourself?
Save the drama for yo mama.
==
My dear fellow, how is that drama? It's a mere fact of life.
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
------------------------------
This message has been edited by Koz4k on Dec 26, 2008 1:41 PM
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 24 2008, 10:20 AM
Today's "multi racial society" only exists in the west. It doesn't exist anywhere else.
That's it's ultimate fault. When European Christians start settling the rest of the world.. then it'l be multi-culturalism, until then.. it's invasion.. perpetuated by traitors, who will be dealt with in good time.
==
Actually I've heard it's on Mars and that the Venetians are the real culprits! Damn you Venetians, damn you all to hell!! Yes, like you I can bleat all I want, as long as I don't have back it up.
And DHP, be carefull with what you wish, since you're probably going to be on that traitor list yourself.
------------------------------
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen Roberts
Re: Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?
December 25 2008, 2:33 AM
"Today's "multi racial society" only exists in the west. It doesn't exist anywhere else."
what bollocks 'west' is not even multi racial to beign withsed
its only also historique of colonialm war mongering destroycing barbaricity faggetry incestuous paedophilia bordellos jungle culture?
"That's it's ultimate fault. When European Christians start settling the rest of the world.. then it'l be multi-culturalism, until then.. it's invasion.. perpetuated by traitors, who will be dealt with in good time"
loli ts only ONLY ONLYONLY Europs westerns christians who starteds illegal immigrations to amerika australia africa asia EVEN wipe out entire americas australians of race religion cultureds language social customs
===========================================
I am old Christiankiller
Sorry for offensive to our good religion christian brothers
I am not hating christians
Current Topic - Ethnicity-specific bioweapons: Europe's hope for the future?