Europe (EUnion+Russia+all micro european states) vs american (USA)
scenario: all out world war
american nuclear weaponry and other WMD is seized before war as its terrorist nation, we UN sent inspectors disarmed this dictatorial fascist banana republic.
for regime change now invade this terrorist outfits stronghold, its scourge for world
leading Operation American Freedom (OAF) is homosexual britain, also Russia Europe Union joins
asian countries afraid of war start practise martial arts taekwando judo ju jitsu kuntfu chaiching wang other types staying out of war
other countries toe russian line
muslim countries stay out of homosexuals fights its faggots they re fighting
RESULT:
????
discuss.
This message has been edited by christiankiller on Jul 21, 2008 4:39 PM
Don't know about what happens to the US, EU or Asia...but I do know that all the a-rabs, pakis, Bangladeshis, and all other camel piss drinking rickshaw pulling islamic terrorist states will get raped back to the stone age.
----------------------------
Don't get rude to me
because
Im a Turkish refugee''
-----------------------------
''geldim, gebertdim, sikdim''
''I came, i killed, i destroyed''
Gaius Julius Tezel wolf (2021)
Small prototype waff advert i did (only draft)
YOU MUST DO LITTLE EVIL TO DO GREATER GOOD!
Tezel, 2008, 2:57am, :D
Don't know about what happens to the US, EU or Asia...but I do know that all the a-rabs, pakis, Bangladeshis, and all other camel piss drinking rickshaw pulling islamic terrorist states will get raped back to the stone age.
Not before Pakistan turn bha-RAT in to one big ****'n astray.
Don't know about what happens to the US, EU or Asia...but I do know that all the a-rabs, pakis, Bangladeshis, and all other camel piss drinking rickshaw pulling islamic terrorist states will get raped back to the stone age.
OK, Christian I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you have an IQ higher than a houseplant.
Assuming as you do, the US has no nuclear weapons, unless your imaginary EU/Russian alliance used them it would, frankly, stand no chance against the US military. This is very simple, neither the EU nor the Russians nor to two of them combined have sufficient power projection assets to mount an armed invasion of the US as you envision.
So you can talk as much as you'd like in the sexually oriented insults (By the way, you seem fixated on homosexual activity and from your descriptions seem quite knowledgeable. Is there anything you want to tell us?)but, frankly, you obviously have no clue about any military topics with the possible exception of gays in the military.
Based upon your reasoning, my assumption regarding your IQ seem highly inflated.
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
"
OK, Christian I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you have an IQ higher than a houseplant.
Assuming as you do, the US has no nuclear weapons, unless your imaginary EU/Russian alliance used them it would, frankly, stand no chance against the US military. This is very simple, neither the EU nor the Russians nor to two of them combined have sufficient power projection assets to mount an armed invasion of the US as you envision.
So you can talk as much as you'd like in the sexually oriented insults (By the way, you seem fixated on homosexual activity and from your descriptions seem quite knowledgeable. Is there anything you want to tell us?)but, frankly, you obviously have no clue about any military topics with the possible exception of gays in the military.
Based upon your reasoning, my assumption regarding your IQ seem highly inflated.
"
dont offend christian its 2billion of world persons youre saying they have low IQ an american fat person of hillybilly note say this? heu he huh huh
dont get angry to christians not to faggots its dominate ur own country its all faggots ALL of them always sinning pope priest penetration topless nudity sinning children backside fellation orgy analyze this is jungle culture drunk drugged nudity?
russian is not making many carriers coz its taking money european is faggot with many money its can give russias big corporation much money to making big carrier force to decimate american dollar crashing country
dont offend christian its 2billion of world persons youre saying they have low IQ an american fat person of hillybilly note say this? heu he huh huh
Hmmmmm. You sound suspiciously like my old friend Dragon. You, Christian, are obviously both intellectually deficient and, at least, a bit mentally deranged.
dont get angry to christians not to faggots its dominate ur own country its all faggots ALL of them always sinning pope priest penetration topless nudity sinning children backside fellation orgy analyze this is jungle culture drunk drugged nudity?
LOL. What a Class “A” idiot.
russian is not making many carriers coz its taking money european is faggot with many money its can give russias big corporation much money to making big carrier force to decimate american dollar crashing country
LOL. Having destroyed your ridiculous premise in a few sentences, this is the best you have? You are really pathetic.
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
I have never heard such ****, u cristianbuttluver are truely the most retarded person i have ever met no wonder the west rapes you nations silly when you are so utterly stupid, go bum a child or summet u **** up.
Lets be realistic here, U.S. does not have the power to invade and take over E.U. and Russia combined, anyone who says otherwise is a lunatic and is very delusional. Just look at the landmass of E.U. and Russia combined and add that to the fact any invasion will be a 1,000,000x worse than what you will ever see in iraq, so if America is struggling in Iraq and Afghanistan what makes you think they can take on E.U. and Russia. Now that being said, neither can E.U. and Russia invade the U.S. successfully; therefore, in a war E.U. and Russia vs. U.S. all you will see is mass carnage and death on all sides with no winner.
Europeans will lose. Hands down. Because they are homosexual faggotry topless nudity drunk bigotry drugged orgy pope priest penetration children backside fellation clergy mothers sex intercourse strangers children astray topless backside beach showing nudity naked jungle people culture...
ps "mothers sex" (?) WTF?
This message has been edited by achaios77 on Jul 26, 2008 12:30 AM
Europeans will lose. Hands down. Because they are homosexual faggotry topless nudity drunk bigotry drugged orgy pope priest penetration children backside fellation clergy mothers sex intercourse strangers children astray topless backside beach showing nudity naked jungle people culture...
@FN first win ur war against poverty, aides, malaria, cholera etc... then discuss fighting the islamic world...the one that used to rule over ur sorry garlic stinky asses for centries...
provost dont being jealous of your country turning to rubble
russia can make mincemeat of american with american nuclear weapon seized by united nation for american atrocity terrorist murderous extremist activity
russian tzar bomba can displace new york skyscraper to pacific ocean hahaha in gaseous state?
russian is thinking of making 5-6 carrier group in north pacific oceans its immense land mass huge country. with europe rich money funds russian and european german french british homosexuality against american homosexuality its even game but russian + other european money can make bigger force projection than american dreamland can ever dream of
provost dont being jealous of your country turning to rubble
I’m hardly jealous, Christian.
russia can make mincemeat of american with american nuclear weapon seized by united nation for american atrocity terrorist murderous extremist activity
LOL. Your premise is, well, ridicuolous. The UN is hardly more than a debating society which is designed to suck resources from its member nations to pay for a bloated bureaucracy largely populated by people who couldn’t be employed in their country of origin.
That being said, you’ve failed, wholly, to address my point about the inability of the Russians or the EU to genuinely project power. Any such destruction you envision of the US would require an invasion and occupation. Neither the EU nor Russia has the resources to do either.
russian tzar bomba can displace new york skyscraper to pacific ocean hahaha in gaseous state?
Any such nuclear campaign would spell the death of hundreds of millions around the world. If man is responsible for global climate change, as many suggest, the wholesale expenditure of multiple nuclear weapons would doom the world.
russian is thinking of making 5-6 carrier group in north pacific oceans its immense land mass huge country.
Bull. Russia has no such capability nor will it have in the next decade.
with europe rich money funds russian and european german french british homosexuality against american homosexuality its even game but russian + other european money can make bigger force projection than american dreamland can ever dream of
Your interest in homosexuality seems very genuine. I hope you enjoy your practice of it.
american is toasted this is my prediction
Well, based upon your immense display of intellect, you’ll excuse me it I don’t retire to my fallout shelter.
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
Mikepapa1, you also failed to prove how the United States can project the forces needed to destroy or occupy EU and Russia short of a Nuclear attack. United States can project the forces need to fight countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam and such but it has no where the conventional power to take on the whole EU and Russia combined, its just unthinkable. United
States cannot destroy and occuppy Russia alone let alone destroy or occupy EU also. Anyone who says otherwise is a lunatic and not living in reality. But neither can EU and Russia at their present stage project the forces need to destroy and occupy U.S.
But I think if it came to a war of that magnitude and Russia and EU fully geared up for war, the economy and purchasing power of the EU and Russia along with Russia's huge oil and gas reserves which can be used to fuel Russian and EU forces coupled with the technology and industrial base of Russia and EU they can field a conventional forces large enough to invade U.S. but that doesn't mean they will succeed in occupying America it just means they can field the forces necessary to invade and may occupy parts and lay waste to many parts but not fully occupy the continental United States. If you look at it Visa Versa the U.S. alone cannot field the forces either if it fully geared up for war to fully occupy EU and Russia which alone are 5-6 times the size of the U.S. landmass.
I think with also sides geared up for war the EU and Russia have a better chance than U.S. in a war; you have countries like Germany with its huge economy and industrial/technological base and ingenuity, France's economy with its industrial/tech base, U.K's economy and industrial/technological base along with countries that have large economies and weapons industries like Sweden, Italy, Spain, also last but not least Eastern European countries with the huge population bases to provided large amounts of military service men, and Russia's huge industrial/technological base with factories ready to be converted to churn out thousands of tanks, planes and ships along with its huge gas and oil fields to provide the fuel to EU and itself.........Now compare this to 1 country the United States though it has the industrial and technological base has no real recuit pool base for its military, with an economy in shambles and no huge gas and oil reserve of its own to depend on furthing hampering how long it can fight and sustain a war.
I think with also sides fully geared the EU and Russia have a better chance in a war than the United States, not that im saying either can occupy the other but EU and Russia have a better chance. The are technologically and industrially on par with the U.S but the lead the U.S. in numerically, economically (all of the combined economy is many times large than the America), and natural reserves (Russia's natural reserves alone is bigger than U.S.), and they also have bigger landmass which gives them the advantage of strategic depth.
I guess you didn't bother to read Christian's original scenario, United. I really don't blame you, it wasn't much. He envisions a joint EU/Russian invasion of the US to change the "regime" codenamed Operation American Freedom. What part of that suggests an invasion of Europe to you?
My point was that regardless of resources neither the EU nor Russia is in a position to project power intercontinentally. You don't refute my premise, but merely try to say that the US can't either. You may be right, United, the US might not be able to project sufficient power to occupy Europe, but that is hardly the point, is it?
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
Mikepapa1, you also failed to prove how the United States can project the forces needed to destroy or occupy EU and Russia short of a Nuclear attack. United States can project the forces need to fight countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam and such but it has no where the conventional power to take on the whole EU and Russia combined, its just unthinkable. United
States cannot destroy and occuppy Russia alone let alone destroy or occupy EU also. Anyone who says otherwise is a lunatic and not living in reality. But neither can EU and Russia at their present stage project the forces need to destroy and occupy U.S.
The US might not be able to occupy Europe but id could certainly cripple it till the end of times , something that can't be said vice versa.
But I think if it came to a war of that magnitude and Russia and EU fully geared up for war, the economy and purchasing power of the EU and Russia along with Russia's huge oil and gas reserves which can be used to fuel Russian and EU forces coupled with the technology and industrial base of Russia and EU they can field a conventional forces large enough to invade U.S. but that doesn't mean they will succeed in occupying America it just means they can field the forces necessary to invade and may occupy parts and lay waste to many parts but not fully occupy the continental United States. If you look at it Visa Versa the U.S. alone cannot field the forces either if it fully geared up for war to fully occupy EU and Russia which alone are 5-6 times the size of the U.S. landmass.
What? Are you dumb? Now how does the US navy compare to the Russian and Eu navy lmfao , it would make mince meat of the whole world combined navy's if they choose too attack it , hows that 11+1 carrier groups over 60 most advanced submarines , 27 most advanced cruisers , over 50 and building most advanced destroyers and those OHZ frigates stack up against the incapable and poorly trained russian navy with no power projection and same goes for UK?Come on at least don't make a fool out of yourself .... it can field conventional forces large enough to invade US?? are you stupid , how is their industrial military complexes capability , how many tanks and aircraft and ships and submarines could they build compared to the US , surely you must be out of your mind , im not even mentioning that the facility's will be under constant attack from US cruise missiles from us navy and stealth bombers and the usaf which has bases all over the world , get a grip man.
I think with also sides geared up for war the EU and Russia have a better chance than U.S. in a war; you have countries like Germany with its huge economy and industrial/technological base and ingenuity, France's economy with its industrial/tech base, U.K's economy and industrial/technological base along with countries that have large economies and weapons industries like Sweden, Italy, Spain, also last but not least Eastern European countries with the huge population bases to provided large amounts of military service men, and Russia's huge industrial/technological base with factories ready to be converted to churn out thousands of tanks, planes and ships along with its huge gas and oil fields to provide the fuel to EU and itself.........Now compare this to 1 country the United States though it has the industrial and technological base has no real recuit pool base for its military, with an economy in shambles and no huge gas and oil reserve of its own to depend on furthing hampering how long it can fight and sustain a war.
Thats the most dumb thing I ever heard in my life , the EU and Russian industrial complex can't be compared to the US one , not even in dreams , where the hell are you getting your information, if it wasn't for germany the EU probably couldn't be even 1/5th of what US can produce, you must be joking or something , russian industrial complexes that are old and ineffective ? Just how many factory's do they have in whole country , 4? how many does the US has? and this is not everything , in shipbuilding and aircraft building its not even CLOSE.
I think with also sides fully geared the EU and Russia have a better chance in a war than the United States, not that im saying either can occupy the other but EU and Russia have a better chance. The are technologically and industrially on par with the U.S but the lead the U.S. in numerically, economically (all of the combined economy is many times large than the America), and natural reserves (Russia's natural reserves alone is bigger than U.S.), and they also have bigger landmass which gives them the advantage of strategic depth.
Tehnological parity??? are you stupid? Who has stealth fighters , stealth bombers , AEGIS , AMRAAM-120D , virginia and seawolf class , ticonderoga cruisers , EF-18 ..... what are you talking about what tehological parity?
If the Russians and Europeans decided to invade USA , first of all they would NEVER IN THE WORLD be able to use their airforce , JUST HOW DO YOU EXPECT THEM TO USE A AIRFORCE WITH NO POWER PROJECTION NEAR THE USA? Even if they could the F-22 and patriots would make short work of every aircraft stupid enough to invade the airspace , the Navy has absolutely no chance , zero to ever have a chance against the USN , so what exactly are you smoking?
"I’m hardly jealous, Christian."
christianity say not be jealous not being envy, its good preaching advice from christianity take this abandon faggotry drunk drugged dildo homosexuality pope priest penetration
"LOL. Your premise is, well, ridicuolous. The UN is hardly more than a debating society which is designed to suck resources from its member nations to pay for a bloated bureaucracy largely populated by people who couldn’t be employed in their country of origin."
you cant argue against premise at intermediate stage of debate. either accept this as arbitrary and draw conclusions as valid or draw conclusions as invalid, and deduce premise was ridiculous.
"That being said, you’ve failed, wholly, to address my point about the inability of the Russians or the EU to genuinely project power. Any such destruction you envision of the US would require an invasion and occupation. Neither the EU nor Russia has the resources to do either."
EU russia not have resources? is american fat person not have enough knowledge? tell us economic scientific military knowledge natural resource what is russian and EU lacking for changing terrorist fascist murderous topless nudity faggotry country of fat persons?
"Any such nuclear campaign would spell the death of hundreds of millions around the world. If man is responsible for global climate change, as many suggest, the wholesale expenditure of multiple nuclear weapons would doom the world."
new york to pacific is not around the world mr fat person msut check foreign atlas what american stupidity atlas maker cartographer is showing its wrong. american IN THIS SCENARIO is wmd less
"Bull. Russia has no such capability nor will it have in the next decade."
ok one statement by a fantic nationalist faggotry person nudity toplesss drunk drugged orgy dildo say this must mean russian can not do this? LOL
look ria novosti news izvestiya also saying this news
"Your interest in homosexuality seems very genuine. I hope you enjoy your practice of it."
its american christian fascist (not truth christian like many african asian arab latin country or russia) murderous lewd topless drunk fat ugly drugged whroes slvts nudity priest backside fellation children penetration parents sex stranger children wedlock going astray gang violence crime murder pollution corruption country jungle culture its not my practice this why you enjoy this want others also to enjoying this? its not enjoying in civilized country faggotry is banned in civilized world
"Well, based upon your immense display of intellect, you’ll excuse me it I don’t retire to my fallout shelter.
"
what this american meaning? use good english I am not always using this but i am not english persons I am using this to tell homosexuals faggotry topless european nudity drunk drugged orgy fellation persons to abandon sinning. i am not interested using english its not my language why american has no language its copying england language also fail to use properly? funny LOL
Russia to have 5-6 aircraft carriers in Northern, Pacific Fleets
IF NEEDED russia with european union money greater than all american money can build carrier of course with soviet collapse and own funding alone only 15 year after collapse now it can not fund it later it plans to do this
how is american carrier faring against russian air craft carrier killer? its called is sunburn? with this done european faggotry making many equipment can they not overtake american industrial output easily? lets face this european union and russian GDP is bigger than american easily with many more natural resources
Russia
Population: 140,702,094
Natural Resources: wide natural resource base including major deposits of oil, natural gas, coal, and many strategic minerals, timber
GDP (purchasing power parity): 2.088 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP (official exchange rate): 1.286 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP-real growth rate: 8.1% (2007 est.)
Reserves of foreign exchange and gold: 574.300 billion (July 2008) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_foreign_exchange_reserves>
Labor force: 74.1 million (2007 est.)
Industrial production growth rate: 7.4% (2007 est.)
Oil-proved reserves: 60 billion bbl (1 January 2006 est.)
Natural gas-proved reserves: 47.57 trillion cu m (1 January 2006)
Current account balance: 76.6 billion (2007 est.)
Airports: Total paved/unpaved 1,260 (2007)
Total available manpower for military service: 73,239,761 million
Area: 17,075,200 sq km
christianity say not be jealous not being envy, its good preaching advice from christianity take this abandon faggotry drunk drugged dildo homosexuality pope priest penetration
I’m not Catholic, Christian and your fantasies about having sex with the Pope really don’t interest me.
you cant argue against premise at intermediate stage of debate.
Really? Who says?
either accept this as arbitrary and draw conclusions as valid or draw conclusions as invalid, and deduce premise was ridiculous.
The premise is ridiculous, just as is the person who posited it.
EU russia not have resources?
No, they do not. Not to invade and occupy North America, anyway.
is american fat person not have enough knowledge?
LOL. Yes, Christian, American fat person has enough knowledge.
tell us economic scientific military knowledge natural resource what is russian and EU lacking for changing terrorist fascist murderous topless nudity faggotry country of fat persons?
They have no power projection platforms which would allow them to invade North America nor to logistically support their forces if they did.
new york to pacific is not around the world mr fat person msut check foreign atlas what american stupidity atlas maker cartographer is showing its wrong. american IN THIS SCENARIO is wmd less
So you claim. That, however, Christian my mentally deficient friend is the point. In order for any Russian/EU occupation to succeed, they’d have to deploy nuclear weapons against the US. Without that, they would have no chance whatsoever.
ok one statement by a fantic nationalist faggotry person nudity toplesss drunk drugged orgy dildo say this must mean russian can not do this? LOL
LOL. Yes, it certainly does.
look ria novosti news izvestiya also saying this news
No one is known for more honest reporting than the Russian press. LOL If they said it it must be true.
its american christian fascist (not truth christian like many african asian arab latin country or russia) murderous lewd topless drunk fat ugly drugged whroes slvts nudity priest backside fellation children penetration parents sex stranger children wedlock going astray gang violence crime murder pollution corruption country jungle culture its not my practice this why you enjoy this want others also to enjoying this? its not enjoying in civilized country faggotry is banned in civilized world
LOL. I don’t even know where to begin.
what this american meaning? use good english
LOL. You lecturing anyone on the use of English is one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a long time.
I am not always using this but i am not english persons I am using this to tell homosexuals faggotry topless european nudity drunk drugged orgy fellation persons to abandon sinning. i am not interested using english its not my language
Then one must wonder why you wish to frequent an English language forum.
why american has no language its copying england language also fail to use properly? funny LOL
Yes, you are very funny.
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
Russia to have 5-6 aircraft carriers in Northern, Pacific Fleets
Yup by 2090
IF NEEDED russia with european union money greater than all american money can build carrier of course with soviet collapse and own funding alone only 15 year after collapse now it can not fund it later it plans to do this
Right whats the russian GDP and military budget again? Whats the EU military budget again? oh wait the EU is not even integrated together and they don't have a comon military and can't effectivly work as a many nation army.
how is american carrier faring against russian air craft carrier killer? its called is sunburn? with this done european faggotry making many equipment can they not overtake american industrial output easily? lets face this european union and russian GDP is bigger than american easily with many more natural resources
You have been watching too many movies son and reading to much russian propaganda if you think sinking a carrier is as easy as that , the US must be completly stupid to waiste that much money on carriers if they could get sinked like that.
1.Sunburn can't even target the US carrier from the big range because the ships can't aquire the target behind horizon.The aircrafts can , yet that far out the missiles pose NO threat at all , they would get shot down even hundrets of them.
2.Getting closer with a ship means the CSG submarines would set a trap for the enemy ship hence destroying it , hence making it a strategy for idiots
3.How the hell are russians going to find a carrier in the open sea , are you a complete idiot, they don't know where it is , where its going , NOTHING , they can not track it by any means.
The best is to use sattelites but the imagry will be hours long before the airforce gets there and the carrier's position substantialy different , the bears can do it but they would get destroyed most of them , so waisting them to sink 1 carrier?
4.sunburn is a big missile that has no chance of penetrating the huge 1000km AEGIS around the carrier defended by all its escorts , carrier , E-2 and F-18'es from the carrier , those missiles would be target practice if they even could fire them , BUT THEY CAN'T, except if they do a suacide mission and risk their AVMF.
5.Best the Russians can do is to sacrifice the whole AVMF and whole SSGN sub fleet to have a chance of sinking 1 carrier at the expence of almost everything they would use....
Let me teach you a lesson what it would take to sink a US CSG ,it's going to take a couple of regiments of Backfires, a regiment of Bears and Oscar SSGN's.
First, they fly their RORSAT over the ocean hoping to find the general position of the strike group, and its general course and speed. Let's say they can tie the CSG down to a patch of ocean, perhaps protecting convoys headed from the US and Canada to Europe. Now with RORSAT imagry in hand it's time to refine the position. For that, they need Bears, lots of Bears.Bear flies out over the Atlantic looking and listening for the CSG. The surviving Bears should radio back the battle group's position and course, not alot of bears would survive.
They would send a couple of regiments of bacfires , they need lots of them. And, that carrier may have moved between the time the surviving Bears located it and when your Backfires get into position to launch. So, it's best to spread your launchers across a wide swath of ocean. (It also spreads the defense out too.) They would need the Oscar SSGN's too. It's tough to communicate with them and not reveal his position to the ASW folks, but if you can maneuver a Oscar into a blocking position it will help your Backfire raid. The chances of that are very slim, but heck lets say it would happen. So, now the bacfires are firing their cruise missiles and the Oscar is firing their own , this means a lot of missiles spread out as far as it can.
They will have better solution sets for their cruise missiles if they can actually get within radar range of the battle group. Of course, this will mean that most if not all your Backfires will get shot down by the F-18Es. But, hey bagging a CVN is worth losing your air force, isn't it? They now launch lots and lots of missiles because the Ticonderogas and Burkes will be shooting down the missiles like it was target practice. Between their own radars, and the E-2, they'll have a good target solution on the missiles, so the ruskies would need to overwhelm them. That's why I said they should bring as many regiments of Backfires as you can. They should also make sure they launch in close, so the F-18s won't attrit your missiles with their own AMRAAMs and Sidewinders. If they launch too far out, they won't have a good enough solution set to get all your missiles pointed at the Carrier and too many of them will be attrited before the SM-2s have at them. In the end, all the ruskies can really hope for is a few missiles will leak through and get hits on the carrier.
Now, they have to get really lucky with your hits on the carrier. Remember, the USN hasn't lost a carrier to enemy action since June 1942. Since then, damage control has become higly evolved. The US carriers are armored now and have excellent compartmentalization.
If all this sounds like a suicide mission, well it is. The Sovs knew this. That's why they built the AVMF so large and concentrated it on hitting convoys and not carriers. Convoys were what threatened the Soviet Union, not carriers. At least not until the US unveiled its maritime strategy.
Russia
Population: 140,702,094
Natural Resources: wide natural resource base including major deposits of oil, natural gas, coal, and many strategic minerals, timber
GDP (purchasing power parity): 2.088 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP (official exchange rate): 1.286 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP-real growth rate: 8.1% (2007 est.)
Reserves of foreign exchange and gold: 574.300 billion (July 2008) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_foreign_exchange_reserves
Labor force: 74.1 million (2007 est.)
Industrial production growth rate: 7.4% (2007 est.)
Oil-proved reserves: 60 billion bbl (1 January 2006 est.)
Natural gas-proved reserves: 47.57 trillion cu m (1 January 2006)
Current account balance: 76.6 billion (2007 est.)
Airports: Total paved/unpaved 1,260 (2007)
Total available manpower for military service: 73,239,761 million
Area: 17,075,200 sq km
United States
Population: 303,824,646 (July 2008)
GDP (purchasing power parity): 13.84 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP (official exchange rate): 13.84 trillion (2007 est.)
GDP-real growth rate: 2.2% (2007 est.)
Labor force: 153.1 million (2007 est.)
Oil-proved reserves: 21.76 billion bbl (1 January 2006 est.)
Natural gas-proved reserves: 5.551 trillion cu m (1 January 2006 est.)
Current account balance: -738.6 billion (2007 est.)
Reserves of foreign exchange and gold: 75.850 billion (March 2008) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_foreign_exchange_reserves
Airports: paved/unpaved 14,947 (2007)
Military manpower avialable: 118,600,541 million
Area: 9,161,923 sq km
Interesting the USA has similar GDP , more labor force , more than 10 times more airports , bigger area than EU , bigger defence budget than EU , 10 times stronger NAVY than EU , Eu has not even a comparable airforce against the USAF and its stealth fighters and bombers , far bigger ship and air industryal complexes, the EU is not integrated and the nations don't even know how to work together , just look at the brits and french and germans , heck the brits would rather fight alongside USA than EU , meanwhile the other nations are not integrated militarly together and would not be able to work as a 1 army , and after all that your claim the EU could even so much as to touch the US soil is completly RIDICILOUS.
One mistake i corrected on my post, the EU reserve of foreign exchange and gold is not 65 billion but 563.426 billion.
1) The EU has more Reserve in currency and gold than the U.S
2) Russia has more reserves in foreign currency and gold than the U.S.
3) The account balance of the U.S. is 700 billion plus in the negative and just look at EU and Russia
4)The growth rate in economy and industry is in the 3% for EU, in the 8% for Russia, in the 2% for U.S.
5)The Oil and Gas reserves of the EU and Russia is larger than the U.S.
6) The military manpower available to EU and Russia is larger than the U.S.
6) The EU labor force is larger than the U.S. and if u combined it with Russia even larger
7) Industrial production rate for Russia is 7.4%, U.S. is .5%,EU 2.7%
8) The GDP in purchasing power of the EU is higher than the U.S. and combine Russia's with EU and it would be even larger
9) EU population is almost 200 million plus more than the U.S. when you add Russia's 140 million its even alot greater than the U.S.
10) The land size of Russia is twice as large as U.S. and add EU to Russia and its enormous
11) The only thing U.S. has more is Airports
***When you look at the statistics and compare everything the U.S. only leads in Airports, with an account balance 700 billion plus in the negative and with reserve currency and gold so low in 75 billion comparison to EU or Russia alone the U.S. trails enormously each close to the 600 billion.
***PLEAS READ AND CAREFULLY COMPARE ALL THE STATISTICS BEFORE YOU RESPOND AND YOU WILL SEE THE ONLY PLACE U.S. LEADS IS IN AIRPORTS AGAINST THE EU AND ONLY POPULATION AND AIRPORTS AGAINST RUSSIA.
This message has been edited by UnitedSomalia on Jul 29, 2008 9:09 PM This message has been edited by UnitedSomalia on Jul 29, 2008 9:03 PM
United, let me say this a slowly as I can so you'll understand it. It doesn't matter if Russia/EU have 10 times the money and everything else. Conquest comes down to one simple thing: The ability to project power. That includes two aspects: 1. the ability to put bombs on the target and boots on the ground, and, 2. the ability to provide logistical support to supply those forces. In both of these categories the EU/Russia combination are woefully deficient.
How are the going to seize harbors and airports? How are they going to land on US beaches? More importantly, how are they going to provide food, fuel and ammunition? The simple answer is that they can't. Case closed.
Provost
Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'Press On' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.
Calvin Coolidge, President of the United States 1924-1929
Mikepapa1, all im saying is with such economy, reserves, account balance and industrial output in shambles the U.S. cannot sustain a military operation to destroy the EU and Russia because just having the forces and logistics is not enough you need money for those weapons, money for the soldiers, money for logistics, money to replace those destroyed weapons, money to sustain the American economy so without the money how can U.S. destroy and fight and all out war with EU and Russia. Just look at how the war on terror put the American economy, account, and reserves in disaray, imagine how worse the economy, industry, reserves and account balance would be in a war with EU and Russia.
My point is America may have more power projection but not the money to pay for it or sustain it. And that if EU and Russia both fully geared up for war with their huge money and gold reserves, the EU's 2.7% industrial output and Russia's 7.4% industrial output in comparison to U.S. .5% output, their huge labor force they have the capability to sustain a war better of than the U.S. can right now, having projection power is nothing if you can't sustain it. The EU and Russia have more money and industrial output to if they wanted to produce the weapons they need to project power they can.
This message has been edited by UnitedSomalia on Jul 29, 2008 9:42 PM
Mikepapa1, all im saying is with such economy, reserves, account balance and industrial output in shambles the U.S. cannot sustain a military operation to destroy the EU and Russia because just having the forces and logistics is not enough you need money for those weapons, money for the soldiers, money for logistics, money to replace those destroyed weapons, money to sustain the American economy so without the money how can U.S. destroy and fight and all out war with EU and Russia. Just look at how the war on terror put the American economy, account, and reserves in disaray, imagine how worse the economy, industry, reserves and account balance would be in a war with EU and Russia.
My point is America may have more power projection but not the money to pay for it or sustain it. And that if EU and Russia both fully geared up for war with their huge money and gold reserves, the EU's 2.7% industrial output and Russia's 7.4% industrial output in comparison to U.S. .5% output, their huge labor force they have the capability to sustain a war better of than the U.S. can right now, having projection power is nothing if you can't sustain it. The EU and Russia have more money and industrial output to if they wanted to produce the weapons they need to project power they can.
That may be true , but the fact remains , none can invade the other yet the US with its far superior air force , power projection and naval power can deal much more damage to EU and Russia as vice versa.