We have indeed had at least one fellow who had true LS (Lichen Sclerosis - the term "BXO" as well as "LSA" is considered spurious in contemporary dermatological practice, or so the local specialist tells me) and went on to circumcision.
The problem is that we could never get much detail from him regarding just whether he was getting, or had been offered adequate and competent treatment for the condition, or was "compliant" with such treatment (which is to say, was actually using such treatment properly).
The treatment for that condition,
is the correct "high-potency" steroid ointment, of which betamethasone 0.1% is one option. People are often confused by spurious "warnings" on the Product Information supplied, that it should "not be used for too long". In fact, it is
critical for the treatment of LS, that it be used without (significant) interruption
until the condition completely settles.
Could your condition be LS? Well, it
could, but nothing you have mentioned so far - as best I recall - suggests it. The "classic" story of LS is that the fellow had a readily retractile foreskin which progressively tightened, associated with some irritation and whitening (scarring) of the tight part, which may have cracked or split on forcible attempt to retract or stretch.
Coincidentally, this is almost exactly the same presentation as for chronic Candida infection, except perhaps that for that, itch and whitish discharge is prominent.
I am curious to know what you made of my most recent suggestions in the
previous thread, particularly the "balloon experiment". I would
also like to know exactly - and I do mean
exactly - what it is that you are doing to try and stretch the tight part of the opening.
Now, your options. If the doctor "just would not prescribe you the 0.05% betamethasone", then clearly he is about as useless as the proverbial "tits on a bull". That tells you he knows
nothing about this condition, or how to treat it. Don't get too sad about this, he can't be expected to know everything. Just
don't waste your time with someone who doesn't have the knowledge.

And if the specialist to whom he wanted to refer you was a urologist - forget that, that is the
wrong specialist to treat skin conditions.
I've said this innumerable times - Hydrocortisone is
deliberately prescribed when you
do not want the very effects that would be useful in stretching your foreskin. It will work
only to the extent that you simultaneously discover an effective method to actually stretch the tight region of your foreskin.
No matter
how many times you or anyone else asks the question, the answer will always remain the same. There is no strict
harm in trying the hydrocortisone
except the strong likelihood that it will indeed, fail and you may then incorrectly conclude that the proper steroid ointment will not "work" for you. Unless as I say, it happens that in applying the ointment, you manage to discover an effective stretching manoeuvre.
Would the "Glansie" help? Well, again, we have dealt with this here. It might; your references to "can barely see my glans" suggest that on the stretch, you can see an opening of three or four millimetres. That is the calibre at which the "Glansie"
may help, but if you can according to my previous suggestions, get a finger through the tight part so that it slides aside the glans (with a spot of lubrication for comfort), then the "Glansie" is probably too rough.
If you
are prepared to go and find an instrument to do the stretching, then I think you would be better to look for a "nasal speculum" through a proper surgical supplier - or EBay - a short-bladed (
not veterinary!) Killian or Cottle
with the screw would appear to be much more useful than the "Glansie" and considerably cheaper. Only one "downside" - the nasal speculum will tend to slip out unless you hold it in place, but I think that could be accommodated.