That was the thesis of
Joycelyn Elders - one wonders whether with the advent of the Obama administration, she might finally receive an official apology for the abominable way she was treated on this and many other counts (no doubt, including her colour)? Sadly, America has probably not
really advanced so far.
Wim, our
previous discussion with you has proven extremely frustrating, as you have
never confirmed that you have actually implemented
any of the advice given on this discussion board. You have only ever described pulling your foreskin back, but do not mention using any of the actual positive stretching techniques we have described. As I have repeatedly pointed out, merely pulling the foreskin back, whilst it is the normal way that the foreskin becomes functional during childhood (and indeed during masturbation), it is by no means sufficient to effect stretching in these difficult cases, even if practiced for many months as you claim to have done.
There is absolutely
no use visiting another and yet another discussion board, asking the question repeatedly and searching for "novel" ideas, if you are not going to implement the simple, straightforward steps
necessary to resolve the problem,
You have consistently been a bit hazy on the details, but it seems that you can in fact, retract while flaccid and visualise your whole glans. On this basis, you
should be able to get at least two little fingers in through the opening of your foreskin (whilst pulled
forward) and stretch in this fashion, which will prove far more effective than simply retracting. If this thing that we have been advising from the beginning, but yet find you say you are not doing it "because of lack of privacy", well clearly you are simply
wasting everyone's time, ours, everyone else who answers your questions in good faith, and for what it is worth -
your own.
Nevertheless, you have relieved me on one point - since I
know what is effective in achieving what you
claim to want; I
know that it works, effectively and would be most worried if it proved not to. It seems you are simply saying that it has not worked for
you because you simply
are not doing it. There is in that case really no way I can help you further.
Now as to this matter of masturbation technique, there is some truth in it, and some "hype". Masturbation by "humping" may or may not actually be a "minority" practice. It is even possible that it is a majority practice amongst (young) girls because it avoids touching the vulval area and deflects guilt that parents may have inculcated. It can be seen as "natural"; imitating intercourse and indeed flows on to the mutual practice of "dry humping" to orgasm. It is quite possible that this form of masturbation is employed by at least 10% of young boys and is perhaps the easiest way to "discover" masturbation by oneself while being difficult to demonstrate to someone else, it is more likely that if one is shown masturbation by another, the form that will be demonstrated will be stroking by hand.
The suggestion that this sort of masturbation is "damaging" needs to be looked at very critically. As I have recently pointed out, it
is possible to "burn" the skin during masturbation by vigorous friction, and yes, if you were to do that repeatedly, you would no doubt develop callousing similar to that on hands and feet from constant use. But the aftermath of doing such a thing is generally sufficiently unpleasant as to warn against repeating it.
It is interesting that "humping" is quite common also amongst circumcised boys (I think you can find references to this on JackinWorld) as are other practices involving dry friction. The exposed glans consequent to circumcision necessarily becomes
much less sensitive and so tolerates (but not necessarily with comfort) friction that would be immediately painful to an intact fellow.
The real advantage of an intact foreskin, even if (or perhaps
especially if) it is not retractile, is that it has a range of movement over the glans, so that you can employ the "humping" motion
without the skin actually moving against bedding (or clothing), and if there is no actual abrasion, then there is
no reason to suspect that there would be any damage to the foreskin. You should be able to judge for yourself whether what you practice involves your foreskin actually
moving against material, or in fact being
gripped by the material so as to be moved against your glans.
Now as to the suggestion that you might be damaging the cavernous or spongy bodies in your penis, it again holds that whatever you might do to risk this, should be immediately self-evident and frankly
painful. I cannot see that you would willingly do such a thing (to your willy

). Injuries to the corpora cavernosae do happen but usually involve a partner's clumsiness with full body weight applied. This is a far cry from you carefully positioning yourself prone on your bed, and virtually impossible to inflict with your hand by any form of accident. And I doubt that you have even tried pushing your penis
down to "hump" as this is neither comfortable nor pleasurable.
What
is plausible, is that when practicing "humping", you do in fact modify your movements specifically to
avoid retraction, since even partial retraction will cause your very sensitive glans to come into contact with the dry material against which you are rubbing, so in this way you are discouraging retraction. From the opposite viewpoint, having a tight foreskin that
will not retract actually makes it
easier to masturbate by humping, since it permits much more forceful thrusting without the sensitive glans being exposed in such a fashion.
If you think about it carefully, you do not thrust or slide against against the bed with the opening of your foreskin perpendicular to the material, so that part is not the part that would be subject to friction and potential injury. What you actually do (or tell me if it is otherwise) is to thrust with your penis "sandwiched" between your body and the material so the part of your foreskin that is rubbed is that part over the
underneath of the glans, and that is
not the tight part.
All in all, I think that the explanation of "damaging masturbation habits" is quite clever, but simply misguided and a gross extrapolation of the simple observation that some learned masturbation habits simply
do not favour retraction.
What
you need to do, is to simply
accept the straightforward advice we have previously given. Masturbating with your hand in the "conventional" (but not necessarily the "correct" or only "proper") manner may well facilitate this, but if you can find the time - and privacy - to masturbate, then you can
certainly find the time and privacy to properly stretch.