Oh my, that website is a laugh a minute. I tried to follow the link "What is Helium?
" and got "Page Not Available .. The Helium Page youve requested cannot be found. We apologize for the inconvenience. Please see the following ...". That's not
a good "look" for a website. Fortunately, it seems to have since been corrected.
The 19 year old author of the article in question, Wayne K. Wilkins
has written some other articles including Why you should not kill spiders
which is pretty good in the main, but includes such assertions as "there is no reason to fear the common spiders you find in your home or garden". Well, that may
for all I know apply to Birmingham, West Midlands GB, but not Sydney Australia.
Anyway, the article is as you say, not bad - it correctly observes that phimosis (or indeed, paraphimosis) "is treatable and does not require circumcision despite what the doctor may tell you" and that paraphimosis is a rare condition. It mentions (albeit mis-spelled, the accent perhaps lost in the system) Michel Beaugé
whose work certainly has some significance in relation to phimosis.
I would however be inclined to omit such statements as "This is a medical emergency which can cause gangrene if the condition persists" - the fact is that there may
have been one or two cases of such a catastrophe written up in the medical journals - as a curio, since this consequence is so absurdly improbable. A paediatric surgeon to whom I spoke after a lecture a few years back, made the observation that of colleagues with whom he had discussed such things, no-one actually had personal
experience of any actual harm coming to a penis even where paraphimosis had been left uncorrected. It may happen, but such a "potentially deadly condition" appears to be more in the realm of "old wives tales".
Another somewhat confused statement refers to "pulling the foreskin back to its usual position and holding it there until everything returns to normal". Fair enough, but since the very nature of paraphimosis is that it is the tightness of the foreskin that makes pulling it forward difficult, it follows that once pulled forward, it is not
going to slip back again by itself, so the need for "holding it there" is hardly meaningful.
And I am not at all sure that first sexual intercourse is
a common cause of paraphimosis - most cases are the result of deliberately pulling the foreskin back but not comprehending
the need to pull it forward again.
And I can see no reason why phimosis and paraphimosis should be or are becoming more common; certainly not simply because you see an article on some "chatty" Web site. As the practice of ritual circumcision becomes less common in America, we certainly may hope
that doctors will become more competent in attending to the small number of problems that can arise from improper care of the foreskin.