I worry about posts like this - I really
worry! Anyone who says "It would seem as though circumcision is the only way forward" or some such similar thing clearly has simply no idea whatsoever
what circumcision means
Do you not comprehend
that "circumcision" actually means cutting off
no less than a half, and more usually, two-thirds of the skin from the penis
? How could you you bring yourself to believe
that such a mutilation could "cure" some problem you perceive you are having with your penis (or indeed, anyone else's)? Surely you must have a substantial educational and/ or cognitive deficit if you can imagine this, must you not?
So you are saying to us that your glans (penis head) is sensitive
when not covered by your foreskin, eh? It would seem you have either not read
, or certainly not understood
, my clear point that if you were taking notice of what sort of things the girl
finds pleasurable instead of simply your own
amusement, you would by now know
firstly that this description of being too painful to touch applies precisely to her clitoris
unless - as has been written here and repeated ad nauseam
- it is adequately
lubricated (and that most preferably achieved by her becoming sufficiently "wet").
It is absurd
to claim your glans to be excessively sensitive when it is clearly perfectly comfortable - dry or not - when covered by your foreskin - as evidenced by your ability to masturbate enjoyably. Clearly there is something about
being covered by your foreskin that ensures perfect comfort and that is nothing more nor less than the absence of (or in fact, close control of) friction
- it is telling you that you have to treat it in a certain way; generally one that mimics a lubricated
vagina (not that there is any hurry to actually implement this
And if you think this sensitivity makes things tricky now
, can you not comprehend how much worse it would be if
you had a circumcision and the glans was no longer protected by the foreskin and in constant contact with dry, adherent clothing? How could you ever imagine that to be an "advantage"?
Clearly what you presently do in masturbation is perfectly pleasurable and in fact, the ability to use the pressure of the foreskin as you "just pull back as far as possible" is a great
source of pleasure to intact men and envy to the circumcised.
And clearly, you need
to do the stretching. If the sensitivity of the glans happens to be a concern whilst doing this, a touch of lubricant (only) on the parts of the fingers that touch it whilst stretching, will solve that matter.
As for use of a condom, you must
surely understand that the mechanics of intercourse with a condom will
always be different to those in the (distant) future when it is appropriate not to use one. Instructions regarding condom use are generally provided by circumcised men (as often as not, in America, and apologies to Jim's suggestions) who have no actual idea of what happens with a foreskin. Essentially, the advice is "don't fiddle
"! You just get an erection, forget whatever the foreskin does as you get the erection, put on the condom and (given that your young lady's vulva is wet and slippery to touch, and possibly with some artificial lubricant added to the outside of the condom) you proceed accordingly. If your foreskin was retracted to put the condom on, you would probably have wanted to add just a touch of lubricant to your glans first as I have explained above though most likely your own "pre-come" will, trapped inside the condom, provide perfectly adequate lubrication, the more so as things progress.
Hmm, have I forgotten anything?