I want to ask a question regarding the difference between circumcision and uncircumcision penis. does it mean that circumcision penis doesn't have any frenulum and upper portion of foreskin has cut.

One which has been circumcised generally is missing all of the foreskin, but not always. The same holds true for the frenulum. There is no set pattern by which the surgery is performed.

That means, the penis having frenulum will open up only to the bottom part of penis head. Is it correct????

Some frenulums are longer than others and allow a greater range of motion.

So, actually my frenulum doesn't allow the foreskin to move down after it crosses the bottom of my penis head. Is it normal? if yes then will it create any problem at the time of intercourse? if no then how to fix it? please answer this.

extends well in front of the glans, so there is plenty to roll back behind when you retract it. Take a look at this page (all pictures of the same foreskin as far as we know) to get an idea of this, especially pictures 8 and 11 which demonstrate that the frænulum should not significantly restrict retraction.

It follows then that circumcision is intended to remove that tubular part of the foreskin which would normally pull behind the glans so that the only difference in appearance when retracted would be the amount (and texture) of skin immediately behind the glans.

The frænulum is involved to a varying degree in circumcision, depending on how much it restricts the foreskin being pulled back, since pulling back the foreskin is generally part of the circumcision procedure. It is common to divide it first in order to pull the foreskin back where the circumcision is performed on the excuse of a non-retractile foreskin because if the foreskin has never retracted, the frænulum has generally never been stretched (by routine retraction) to its proper length. Where a circumcision is performed for cosmetic perversion (on a fully functional penis); the frænulum may not be involved at all.

So, pls suggest me what to do next? I think my condition is very much similar to figure number 8-11. do i need a circumcision or with streching i can manage. can a person do intercourse without any difficulty if he has a penis like figure number 11????

Let's get one thing understood. NO ONE needs a circumcision unless his penis is begin eaten up by cancer. Understand? No one includes you. Get this idea out of your head or you'll soon be scheduling it.

We have three rules here:

1. If the opening is tight, you stretch it to make it bigger.

2. If the frenlum is short, you stretch it to make it longer.

3. Don't cause pain.

It's pretty simple. If you want results, follow the rules.

So, pls write once more for me. I have the problem as shown in figure 11. So, kindly write the streching exercises again and the maximum time to give for it.Thank you again...

The answer is right on this page. You need to read every thread on the page, and once you've done that, you'll know the answer. There are no shortcuts to success. I want you to succeed.