You'd think after all this time and with the election just weeks away they'd have figured out what they stand for. So why is the first item on their mission statement contradicting itself?

OUR MISSION:


1. To abolish all recreational fishing license fees (tax) and introduce a sustainable, all benefactor, user pay system of restructure for our fisheries.


The want to abolish all licence fees/taxes, and introduce a user pays system? What the hell does that mean? As aunty Pauline would say, please explain.

The candidates and the core support group all oppose the RFL because it was the government's idea. But most fishermen support it. So they compromised and put both in the missions statement. This way when it comes to negotiating they can say whatever they want. And if anyone asks about the RFL they can suss out whether they are for or against before giving a response.

You forget so quick dont you Charlie it was supported by fishos in NSW

it is still supported by fishos

thats wierd, didn't Kevin used to call people he didn't like Charlie (or was it Charles?)

yeah I noticed that too, must be a private joke

vote for the fishing party