Opinions on RWC 1938A?January 22 2006 at 4:14 AM
|Daniel (Login expwmbat)|
Looks like an interesting watch to me. I like that it is an homage to the old Rolex/Panerai model, and not merely a Panerai copy/wannabe. I also really like the case shape.
I have a hard time thinking that Panerai are worth the $$$ they are going for these days, and the 1938A seems like a nice way to get a watch in that tradition for a fairer price.
What do those of you who have experience with the watch think of it? Is it a decent buy?
My thoughts also
|January 22 2006, 7:16 AM |
I have the same thoughts on that watch, in fact, I'm seriously thinking of buying one this week. The only thing that gets me is that it is only 50 m water resistant. What kind of tribute is that to a dive watch?
I seriously doubt any WWII italian frogman went below 50m. Seriously.
|January 22 2006, 8:53 AM |
And as far as being a good hommage, I'd say the quality is as good as the Panerai Blackseal and I've owned both.
The watches are excellent. And the "new" panerai has never made this watch, only RWC. It's a wonder Panerai hasn't sued RWC as they did RXW.
|January 22 2006, 9:23 AM |
You really think it's as good as the Panerai Black Seal? Besides the movement finishing, right? The case, dial, crystal were all as good?
That's a pretty good endorsement in my book, not least because I'd be willing to wear the RWC in a lot rougher of circumstances than the Panerai.
Sounds like it might be on my list.
Absolutely. And the RWCs lugs screw together while the Panerai's just
|January 22 2006, 10:16 AM |
slip in and out. I think the RWCs system is better. Of course it uses a plain 6497 but it has a solid back so you don't notice it.
Dial, crystal and case are as good as the blackseal. Actually the crystal on the RWC is better as it's domed and chamfered. Very, very nice.
John in NJ
I've owned both... I wouldn't put it in the Panerai category...
|January 22 2006, 11:59 PM |
... but indeed a watch worthy of the $900 category.
My problems with it and why I sold it:
1) Luminosity was poor.
2) Didn't care for the domed crystal...
3) The dial is actually smaller than on a black seal.. makes the watch seem smaller.
Things I liked:
1) the price
2) the price
3) the price
4) pull crown.. I agree, for daily winding, it makes more sense.
I see them pop on the forums for <$700 so keep an eye out for one.
True, the luminosity is not as good but that's about it in my book. I like the domed
|January 23 2006, 2:21 AM |
crystal better. Case finishing was just as good.
Is the Blackseal a $4k watch? Not to me. But the RWC is certainly a $900 watch.
If 50 m really meant 50 m that would be a different story
|January 22 2006, 11:45 AM |
But we know that 30 m basically means you can wear it in the rain, 50 means that you might be able to wear it swiming.
Ha Ha! Good point!
|January 22 2006, 9:10 PM |
And 1000 meters means that it was tested with a 50 meter device! No one would ever know better!
Re: I seriously doubt any WWII italian frogman went below 50m. Seriously.
|January 22 2006, 8:20 PM |
>And as far as being a good hommage, I'd say the quality is as good
>as the Panerai Blackseal and I've owned both.
Hmm, you can argue if it's so convenient with a screw down crown
for a watch which needs manual winding every or every second day.
>And the "new" panerai has never made this watch, only RWC. It's a wonder
>Panerai hasn't sued RWC as they did RXW.
I seriously doubt they hold any TM's which is infringed in this case.
Hey, if you don't like it don't buy it. As for the screw down crown the original didn't
|January 22 2006, 9:57 PM |
have one so should an hommage? As for WR how many blackseal wearers will ever (and I mean ever) take their watches in the water? How about a big fat "o"?
|January 23 2006, 4:32 AM |
I have had both blackseal and 1938. I like the domed glass, most seem to like it on the 1950! So why not on the 1938. If you run your fingers over the 1938 the case edges are softer than a blackseal, I prefer this.I love the CA dial,so it is not a 300m dive watch that is not the point.If Porsche remade an exact replica 356 it would be slow,but who would care it would still sell and sell.I love my 1938 It is not ment to be a Panerai rip off it is just a good replica off a very old watch that no one cared much about until very recently.
all this has pushed me over the threshold
|January 23 2006, 6:07 AM |
Ok, I've been into this watch for a while. As long as another deal works, I'll be buying it this week. I'll let you know my reactions.
Thanks for the opinions
|January 23 2006, 9:57 PM |
I look forward to more experiences. I can't make any moves on watches for a little while, but once I get back I may try to move my Omega Dynamic chrono and pick up the 1938. I love the design of the case and dial, but just can't justify the price of the Radiomir.
|January 23 2006, 11:38 PM |
cool looking watch...its all in the pocket and the eye of the beholder...those who can afford the Panerai which btw is a copy of the originals like the RXWs and 1938s..can by one those of us who don't or won't can still enjoy these beauties....the 1938 looks a little like the German frogman issue watch to me...
RWC 1938A vs. Vollmer U5
|January 24 2006, 2:58 AM |
Any difference between the two watches? Here's a pic of the Vollmer. It sells for about the same price as RWC 1938.
|This message has been edited by archie66 on Jan 24, 2006 2:59 AM|
|January 24 2006, 4:25 AM |
This is not at all the same as a1938. No CA dia, wrong hands,no wire lugs.AUTO!!!! With date. I think not.
Plus the Vollmer has a mineral Crystal, the RWC's is Sapphire.
|January 24 2006, 4:47 AM |
I've seen the Vollmer and in my opinion (FWIW) the RWC is head and shoulders above it.
vOLLMER VS rWC 1938
|January 24 2006, 7:25 AM |
the Vollmer is $490 the 1938 is $900+ I am not sure which is more important the saphire or mineral crystal...you can remove the second hand if that makes a difference for about $25...are these supposed to copy the Italian or German frogman watches?
The other major difference , visually
|January 25 2006, 1:10 AM |
is the lug width on the Vollmer is 22 mm as compared to the 1938 which is 26mm.