To be brutally honest, the decommissioning of these three boats was a very bad decision by the Hellenic navy. We need all the FAC's we can get. Dumbos.
Do these boats have wooden hulls? Will they be donated to Georgia?
They're the same vintage as our Dogan class boats but yet while we've upgraded our boats it looks like form the electronic array of the these boats that you've done nothing to them!
Do these boats have wooden hulls? Will they be donated to Georgia?
They're the same vintage as our Dogan class boats but yet while we've upgraded our boats it looks like form the electronic array of the these boats that you've done nothing to them!
They don't have wooden hulls because is a mixture from Comabattante II and III in the 70s like the Dogan class, the boats was the S-148 class donated from Germany to Greece.
@They're the same vintage as our Dogan class boats but yet while we've upgraded our boats it looks like form the electronic array of the these boats that you've done nothing to them!
Look better or open a book. Even these old ships where equiped with latest ESM in order to fire its missiles in total electronic silence.
"Look better or open a book. Even these old ships where equiped with latest ESM in order to fire its missiles in total electronic silence."
Did open the book (too lazy to drag her out last night), I have Jane's Fighting Ships 2008-2009 (need to find the new edition), you're right.
They went through a mid-life update in the 80's. P74-P75 were fitted with Harpoon. New ESM fitted after transfer. P76-P77 modernized at Lambda Shipyard in 2003-2004!
Even so the fire control radars look different. Is this because P74 was a Harpoon boat and the P76 & P77 were Exocet boats?
I Hail The Flag
This message has been edited by DirtyDirtyDirtyBird on Jun 11, 2011 5:07 PM
"Your brain is cancelled. The S Vita program is having some difficulties the but it is far from cancelled.
"
SUPER VITA YOK!
-----------------------------------------------
Jane's Navy International
Non-payment leads BAE to terminate Elefsis fast strike craft deal
Richard Scott
BAE Systems Surface Ships has pulled out of a fast strike craft contract with Elefsis Shipyards, citing continued non-payment from the Greek shipbuilding and shiprepair group.
What was VT Shipbuilding International (now subsumed in BAE Systems Surface Ships) signed a contract with the Neorion-owned Elefsis Shipyards in January 2000 as design authority and principal subcontractor for the design, in-country build and integration of an initial three 62 m Roussen-class fast strike craft for the Hellenic Navy. The original GBP175 million deal covered design services, materiel procurement and combat system integration services, plus a parallel programme of technology transfer and facilities development.
Options were subsequently exercised in 2003 (two ships) and 2008 (two ships) for follow-on craft, bringing total class offtake up to seven. However, only the first four vessels have so far been delivered to the Hellenic Navy; the fifth was launched in 2006 but has remained alongside, pending the reinstatement of equipments removed by Hellenic Navy in August 2009 to support standard repairs and maintenance of the in-service vessels. The final pair remain in the assembly hall at Elefsis Shipyards.
In a 3 March statement to Jane's , BAE Systems said it "had been forced to terminate its agreements with its industrial partner in Greece, Elefsis, to deliver a series of fast attack craft to the Hellenic Navy.
"The regrettable decision results from continued non-payment of monies owed against its contracts, despite a prolonged period of working closely with Elefsis to help resolve its business issues."
It is understood that payments to BAE Systems have been outstanding for over a year, with the arrears now amounting to EUR27 million. A revised payment schedule had been agreed between the two companies in mid-2010, but BAE Systems sources say that Elefsis advised in November last year that it could no longer adhere to these terms.
BAE Systems sources indicate that the company is ready for discussions with the Greek Ministry of Defence to establish whether a revised framework for completion of the remaining vessels can be agreed.
Termination of the Elefsis contract marks a further setback for BAE Systems' naval export business. This comes after the company's annual results, released in February, revealed that the company had lost GBP163 million (USD265 million) relating to existing contracts for Oman and Trinidad and Tobago, both of which have suffered significant programme delays and cost overruns.
It has additionally taken a GBP100 million charge following the Trinidad and Tobago government's September 2010 decision to cancel its contract for three offshore patrol vessels. BAE Systems says it has challenged the move, and itself issued a termination for default notice on the Trinidad and Tobago government. The parties are now proceeding in accordance with the contract's dispute resolution provisions.
So what? The U-214HN contract was cancelled too and we signed a new one. The vessels are 90% ready and most of the money has been payed. The Super Vita porgram will be concluded sooner or later so advise you to stop being delusional.
@Even so the fire control radars look different. Is this because P74 was a Harpoon boat and the P76 & P77 were Exocet boats?
One has Pollux and the other 2 Castor directors.Pollux was pretty crappy but Castor is still decent. Nothing to do with missiles,some boats where given with Exocet, the others without so Harpoon from our stock was fitted. However ESM is in our days the most important electronic device.
"One has Pollux and the other 2 Castor directors.Pollux was pretty crappy but Castor is still decent. Nothing to do with missiles,some boats where given with Exocet, the others without so Harpoon from our stock was fitted. However ESM is in our days the most important electronic device."
Then why the hell did they retire the 3 FAC? They looked in pretty good shape and well maintained. This decommission decision was absurd.
The HN has been in complete decay and meltdown recently.....notable failures, no replacement for grounded P-3B's, unable to keep Zubr's operational, no MLU for Meko 200's, failed ESSM upgrade for Kortenaer's, numerous procurement issues with U-214 & Super Vita's, no clear picture of replacement FFG's.....whats going on?
At least we're not running brand new ships aground on sandbars. Equipment is only half the equation, the other half is professionalism and training. Turks have good equipment, but lack the rest of it.
MLU project has received priority and it is advancing, Kortenaer was never supposed to receive ESSM upgrade, HN ZUBR are in better shape than Russian ones, U-214 is going according to plan with 1 more unit to be commissioned 9 monhts from now and finally the Super Vita are experiencing delays with all parties aiming for a swift solution.
Most important, no HN ship crashed on reefs or sandbars...
-
This message has been edited by VII_PZ_DIV on Jun 12, 2011 7:45 PM
trabzonlee61 (Login TrabzonLee_61) The Conquerors (Turkey)
Re: HN retires 3 Combattante IIB
June 12 2011, 7:48 PM
"Most important, no HN ship crashed on reefs or sandbars..."
yea, because no HN ship is operating 200km away from greece LOL
@Then why the hell did they retire the 3 FAC? They looked in pretty good shape and well maintained. This decommission decision was absurd.
The fact that the look from outside does not reflect the inside.
The main reasons is cost reduction and aging of the ship as they are almost 40 years old. We have now 18 FAC with 2 more comming pretty soon. If you ask me it is a decent force to deter any foe and older FAC are not that survivable as they where in the past.
Also the days when navy was keeping ships just for the numbers are over.