Actually, I can't really figure out how pretty much MOST of these things relate to each other. Confessing my Cultural Illiteracy, I guess. Anyone else have any thoughts on why these images would be on the same page?
He's got Monica Bellucci amogst his mass of beautiful vixens, so he's got point from me. Though, he's only got her in Matrix form, so maybe I'll take that point away ...
The appeal of MAXIM has always eluded me. A friend commented once upon a time that he read and enjoyed it, and asked me what I thought. "WIZARD trying to be PLAYBOY," I said.
I am sure I would enjoy looking at Catherine Bell in Playboy if she did a layout, but I think some of her shots in this Stuff magazine layout would be hard to top. Not that I don't like photos of beautiful nekkid ladies, but I also enjoy "sexy" photos that leave a little to the imagination. http://www.stuffmagazine.com/cover_girls/html/girl_337.html
Stuff magazine articles are very stupid, but they really make me laugh my ass off. I look forward to the text more than the photos.
I've always enjoyed looking at and even reading Maxim and Stuff magazines. They aren't to be taken too seriously, it's like The Onion (theonion.com). Publications run by a bunch of people having way too much fun.
As for those pictures? At first glance... and then several later once I got by Jennifer Garner, my guess is that the guy running the site is assembling a wish list for people he wants to abduct and put into his secret chamber under his garage.