Tell the truth about Mountain Park Baptist Boarding Academy aka bible believer's church of Dandridge, tn. May God have Mercy on your souls I SHALL NOT.

Respond to this messageReturn to tell the truth about Mountain Park Academy Main index
Original Message
  • You didn't feel it had anything to do with the claims?
      Posted Jan 8, 2006 2:37 AM

      Justine, you said:

      I don't know about all the history leading up to my tenure at MPBA, or yours. Like the stuff about other girls' homes they had, or properties they own/owned, etc. I did not feel those issues had anything to do with the claims being brought to court by the girls.

      Don't you think the parents had a right to know about ALL the HISTORY prior to enrolling their children? Do you think any parent in their right mind would leave a child they truly cared about with people with such a history as Bob & Betty Wills?

      Here is just one piece of that HISTORY - from a FEDERAL COURT in 1983:

      Before this Court we have an Order by the Forrest County Youth Court adjudicating Rev. Wills to be in contempt of court, as well as an expanded order of permanent injunctive relief executed against the appealing party.
      ...on the motion for contempt, the court found that one hundred thirty-seven (137) minors had been removed from the state in violation of its order. Additionally, the court determined that there had been total non-compliance with its orders of documentation of the girls' names, ages, parents' addresses and phone numbers....As a part of the expedited discovery, this court enjoined the defendants from removing any girls from the school for the purpose of impeding discovery. It appeared from affidavits filed with the court that in another case when court proceedings were initiated concerning another girl at the school, the girl unexplainedly disappeared....


      What DECENT parent upon learning of these things would enroll their child under the care of "Rev. Wills" ??? As part of enrollment, the parents were required to initial and sign a document that said, "We encourage parents to take advantage of the depth of experience that over twenty-five years has given."

      The parents and girls had claims of FRAUD that were 'conveniently' dismissed prior to trial - even though the parents were not informed as to what that 25 years of 'experience' included - such as the findings by the FEDERAL COURT in 1983!!!!!!

      Yet, you say, "Like the stuff about other girls' homes they had...I did not feel those issues had anything to do with the claims being brought to court by the girls."

      Maybe you don't want to believe it had anything to do with the claims, but it had EVERYTHING to do with the FRAUD claims since they made the parents sign enrollment documents encouraging them to rely on their 25+ years "depth of experience" without disclosing what that REALLY entailed!!!

      It's O.K., cause it is not over 'til the fat lady sings, and this fat lady can't sing a note - if that gives any indication as to when it 'might' 'be over' from the fat lady's vantage point.

      Have a great day!

    Login Status
  • You are not logged in
    • Login

      Provides additional benefits such as notifications, signatures, and user authentication.

      Create Account
    Your Name
    Message Title
    Message Text

    Find more forums on Child AbuseCreate your own forum at Network54
     Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  

       Let the truth be told. Personal opinions are those of the poster they may or may not agree with owners opinion Owner of this boards ASSumes no responsibility for opinion stated here. So go suck an egg bitch.      Everyone has a right to their own opinion.