<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

banks

October 26 2006 at 5:27 PM
Gary 

 
Larry,
I was wondering why all the large banks (GS, BSC, MS, JPM) have a negative enterprise value and N/A EBITA. They are all going straight up. I was under the impression that a negative yield curve was bad for the banks.

Gary

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Larry Holmes

Re: banks

October 26 2006, 6:50 PM 

Gary,

Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, and Morgan Stanley are not bank stocks. JP Morgan is a big money center bank that has a lot going on other than just borowing short and lending long, which is a traditional bank activity that would be affected by a negative yield curve.

However, the real answer to your question is if you have money burning a hole in your pocket forget banks and buy more silver.

Larry

 
 
Gary

Re: banks

October 26 2006, 7:57 PM 

I have no intention of buying any of the large financial stocks. Certainly not after this crazy run up. I was just wondering why the stocks are shooting to the moon. By looking at their stock price they must be making money hand over fist. BTW I did just buy a load of silver a couple of weeks ago

Gary

 
 
Gary

Re: banks

October 26 2006, 8:00 PM 

Why do the financials have a negative enterprise value?

 
 

Re: banks

October 26 2006, 8:14 PM 

I've never heard of a measure called a "load" of silver. How many ounces are in a load?

I would have to look at their financial statements to tell you why the enterprise value is negative. But my guess would be that they have so much cash and cash equivalents in relation to their market caps that it creates a negative enterprise value. You can't analyze financial stocks like you would other stocks.

Larry

 
 
Gary

Re: banks

October 26 2006, 8:19 PM 

A "bunch" of ounces are in a "load"

Gary

 
 
Current Topic - banks  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement