| FootageApril 1 2007 at 3:58 AM | JR (no login) |
Response to Henry Cho Footage |
| dont know why I feel the need to respond but
As I posted a month ago, I was contacted, along with someone from concord and I think 5 others. I was told about the footage and posted here to see if anyone knew about it. I never knew anything about it. I was told I would be sent a sample and so would everyone who was interested. How many times have we heard about existing footage that never shows? It was nice to see it was legit.
Everyone was asked not share the link, even though the footage had preview written across it, was shrunk down and had some background noise on the footage, the owner knew it would be shown. Personally I saw no real gem either or why it shouldn't shared and obviously someone else felt it was ok, so be it.
The gentleman who owns the footage wasn't sure what it was and neighter was I. But now we all know. I will bid along with a few others for it, but the beautiful thing is everyone and anyone can bid on it, you want to buy it and share it with everyone, for free, by all means,there it is. If you dont think it is worth buying, dont. How simple is that? But dont throw rocks at me for posting about it before anyone knew about it. It does proves what I have said all along, I have paid for most of the footage I have released one way or another regardless to what some people have said. I paid a fortune for the milton berle footage that everyone has now, but no one said a word when it was found. And someone todl this guy, here is the people who will pay for the footage contact him, along with a few others, how ironic.
I did not pull the post off this site in fact I thought it was cool someone posted it for everyone. But I was asked not too.I think it is worth buying and viewing all of it to see what is there. Obviously concord moon has a interest also. The warning to all bidders that came in the email from the owner says it all though, you take a chance that (once again) concord moon will say, so what you own it, you can't release it, because we own bruce lee. I am sure that is ok with some of you, but I have a problem with home footage shot from 60's by a private citizen and concord says not so fast, it is footage with Bruce in it. So here starts that BS all over again.
Anyhow the guy who owns it is part of the catholic archdioceses and I think a stand up guy. If I get it, great, if I dont I won't lose sleep over it. But I can't wait to see it all nice and clear if I do win it.
-JR | |
| | Responses Bootlegger says what? - JR's master on Apr 1, 2007, 5:45 AM
- putz? - bb gunner on Apr 1, 2007, 1:50 PM
JR- - ROY on Apr 1, 2007, 5:51 AM
Re: Footage - anonymously anonymous on Apr 1, 2007, 10:12 AM
|
|
|