Hang on, is this the Dunblane thing again? You stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid ignorant twat.
The reason why stuff was put under the 100 year rule was explained in the enquiry a few years ago you stupid stupid boy.
It is because there was a list of children who were, or were suspected of being victims of Hamilton, including if I recall correctly, Robertson's son. Given their age, the 50 year rule wouldn't have been sufficent as they would still have been alive once the details came out, so to protect their identity, the 100 year rule was used. You know, protect the identity of underage victims of a horrible crime. Yes, other documents which shouldn't have been included under the 100 year rule were lumped in with them, but they were released in the enquiry a couple(few?) years back.
Rather than reading the psychotic ramblings written years ago on websites like Redwatch, you should try keeping up with the news a bit.
Idiot idiot idiot idiot idiot. Trying to use a decision to protect the identities of victims to have a pop at Brown. All you have shown is that Edinburgh project documenting the IQ of voters by political party over the last 35 years is correct. BNP voters have an IQ less than the average. Your stupidity really knows no bounds.
|