November 13 2003 at 9:04 PM No score for this post
(no login)
I am just wondering what everyone would say the toughest weight classes were.... Like by ranking them 1 through 14....The toughest weight class being the #1 and the weakest as #14... As you see things now...
really tuff? out of those 5, 4 of the them qualified and 2 placed. 4 qualifiers at a weight does not make it tuff, especially when 1 of those (bauer) is jumping that much weight. good order lock
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
The Lock does quite abit of researching and scouting.160 is a tuff weight class take Troye and Wenger out how many medals from last year are their?Remember this is all going on last years finishes.103 is'nt a proven weight class from last years high school finishes because the guys have grown,so this is based last years 8th grade-IKWF-IESA.And at this weight 103 it is loaded with talented small guys.Macaffrey 2nd at nationals,Lawton 3 IKWF medals.Clark 2 time state champ IESA,Peterson 2 IKWF medals,Andrukaitis 2 IKWF medals.Alber 4 IKWF medals and state champ,Rush 2 IKWF Medals,Mathieu 1 IKWF(?)Warpecha IESA coming from Sandwich only a plus Don't know his stats.Last year alone this weight class produced 2 state champs and 3 runner ups.Lock is going on the talent in the weight classes alone and has done a fine job.P.S. you must be at 160.
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.