How can we make these rankings more user friendly?

Would you like each survey to be a weight class or maybe a range of weight classes...e.g.

103,112, 119

125, 130, 135 - etc

Take a look at the survey I have set up here. Several people have voted already. I will post updated rankings once I get some more Viewer Rankings.

http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?MG1EW81R1SG79GSD1XKBXSVY

It forces people who are interested in a single weight to answer everything thus decresing the accuracy of what informed people actaully think. Also you have so many stats wrong. some of these people graduated, some great guys still in it aren't there, and just about everyone is from Morton in berwyn, which isn't right at all.

I know about team thing. Somehow the teams got replaced with the Sectional they wrestled. That will be fixed.

I was thinking about setting them up by light weights, middle, middle upper and upper weights?

Or do you think I should do it by weight class?

I am curious to see which kids are not included. If they placed in the state tournament they should be there. If they qualified for state, the top place winners in each Sectionals are there, but not all the qualifiers are there - because I did not want to list 20 kids a weight.

Let me know any big names that are not there.

Do you think I should put all the qualifiers there by weight class? Then reduce them later to the top 10, after a couple weeks of wrestling?

Thanks for the feedback. This will make it a lot more user friendly...