There is something different, but I'm still figuring it out





1.











2.











3.










4.











5.











6.











7.











8.

How are the tones with the 5dmk3?

Looks more alive.

Your DOF is not as shallow as well. 2.8 100mm wide open?

and more uniform. I shot these with the 180mm. Had with me the 100mm but rain was coming and didn't have the chance, these were taken in a hurry. I also didn't shoot them all wide open on purpose. Have to go back.

splendid.
just so sweet and natural.
transitions are perfect.
Can't be so claose as with DX, but FX gives so much more.

Deniz.

Hadn't had the time to sit down and study the possibilities. Thanks Deniz

are you using the individual lens "mapping"... I read that it makes a big difference for some lenses.

The images just have a very smooth feel to them...

Casey

nt

and neither the 100mm. I was planning to do it but just forgot. However, on other lenses (24-105 and 17-40) it has worked pretty well, specially with aberrations.

That's a successful test, Eduardo.

2 - I don't know what kind of leaf it is but it's fantastic. Amazing detail.

3 - has a nice art nouveau feel to it, especially in the center of the image. I like it a lot.

4 - reminds me of nature printing (where you press the leaves into lead to make a printing plate). Lovely colors here.

5 - Such an architect.

I don't know what the differences are between your new camera and old, but the technical quality of these images is great. The out of focus areas are so creamy and rich (but I don't know if that's the new camera, the lens, the post, etc). No matter, it's working, and the sharp areas are still sharp.

Thanks for sharing, Eduardo,

Jeff

when I reviewed the images. There is a difference in the "creaminess" of the bokeh and I don't know if it's the full frame (I had to open the lens more to get this effect with the 7D) or the camera model per se. Obviously, there's more capability with high ISO's. The lens is the one I've used before, but this time I didn't use the 1.4 extender (maybe more sharpness?). Apart from that, no difference in PP approach. Supposedly, the camera would have probably get better IQ with the 100 Macro, specially using 2.8, but I never got to test it (a good excuse to go back). #2 is actually a seed: Pterocarpus tree, pretty common here. #4 was an educated risk.

Thanks a lot Jeff.