| The teamJanuary 11 2004 at 12:45 PM No score for this post | Noone (no login) from IP address 24.146.9.152 |
Response to The boy playing.. boys not playing for CLearview |
|
You said that Clearview did bad in mississuage, well arent teams allowed to have bad weekends. Clearview may not have had a good outcome but is still a good team. You said somethign about them playing at a a or lower level. Yet they played Durham who has only lost one game to Aurora, and Clearview beat them 7-1. But yeah they are definitly a A or lower level. The weird thing is the other goalie was in, and she played outstanding, and the other goalie ( the boy goalie) was on the bench, if the team felt they needed the boy goalie why wasnt she in.
| |
| Responses- Re: The team - Anonymous on Jan 11, 12:55 PM
- agreed - hockey watcher99 on Jan 11, 2:46 PM
- So Let's Talk Facts - Hockey Watcher - Stars Fan on Jan 12, 10:12 AM
- Simply saying the obvious - hockey WATCHER99 on Jan 12, 7:47 PM
- Obvious to who? - StarsFan on Jan 13, 2:51 PM
- Re: Obvious to who? - Anonymous on Jan 15, 3:31 PM
- Re: So Let's Talk Facts - Hockey Watcher - Anonymous on Jan 12, 7:58 PM
|
|
|