In your opinion, which vote-sucking third-party candidate held(holds) the most-noxious, prejudiced views on a particular people. In Nader's case, it's the Jews/Israel/American Zionists he abhors, and in George Wallace's case, it was the "Nigras." Both were(are) masters at couching their racist-rhetoric in language acceptable to the adherents of their particular prejudices, and to the mainstream media of their times.
Wallace might be "old news" for some of our readers, here...too ancient a historical figure to be recalled. Here's a brief account of his career, that hits most of the high and lowlights. http://www.neh.gov/news/humanities/2000-03/wallace.html
Nader's comments on the "Zionist puppet-show in Washington" are alarming even to some of his most-fervent fans. To wit:
What has been happening over the years is a predictable routine from the head of the Israeli government.
The Israeli puppeteer travels to Washington. The Israeli puppeteer meets with the puppet in the White House, and then moves down Pennsylvania Avenue and meets with the puppets in Congress, and then takes back billions of taxpayer dollars. It is time for the Washington puppet show to be replaced by the Washington peace show. In that, we will enhance the freedom and security of both Palestinian and Israeli people, peoples around the world, and the American people here and abroad.
More on Nader's "anti-Zionist" rhetoric: