New rating system same old problems

by johnnydavis (Login johnnydavis)


I must admit I was somewhat optimistic with "MYLax Rankings" aiding in the rating process. However, it appears some of the same old problems exist. Scores from some of the tournaments have not been included. Also, there is confusion over #1 and #2 teams. Just to be clear, Halton Hills #2 midgets did not beat Brampton #1 in Arthur this weekend. They did not even beat Brampton #2. It was a Brampton house league team. I have found multiple errors in just the games of the one team that I am involved with. How many mistakes are there? Who is responsible for sending in the scores? Is there a mechanism in place to address incorrect scores? Here we go again. We will never have an accurate rating system, no matter how scientific and objective it is, until the correct data is entered. Garbage in, garbage out.

Posted on Jun 20, 2012, 2:23 PM
from IP address

Respond to this message

Return to Index

  1. ummmm. PricklyThistle, Jun 20, 2012, 2:32 PM
  2. Agreed. laxbiz, Jun 20, 2012, 2:41 PM
  3. Click on the Fix button. Jamie, Jun 20, 2012, 3:05 PM
    1. that is good but.... johnnydavis, Jun 20, 2012, 7:44 PM

Find more forums on LacrosseCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Tyke: Whitby (A), Oshawa (B), Barrie (C), Stars (D), Windsor (E)
Novice: Mimico (A), Innisfil (B), Orillia (C), Wallaceburg (D), Kawartha Lakes (E) Nepean (F)
Peewee: Whitby (A), Wallaceburg (B), Cambridge (C), Huntsville (D), London (E) NOTL (F)
Bantam: St. Catharines (A), Owen Sound (B), Oakville (C), Wallaceburg (D) Nepean (E)
Midget: Orangeville (A), Owen Sound (B), Cornwall (C), Orangeville (D)
Intermediate: Beaches (A), Six Nations (B), Sudbury (C)
Bantam Girls: Centre Wellington (A), Six Nations (B), Sarnia (C)
Midget Girls: Whitby (A), Hamilton (B), Sarnia (C)
Intermediate Girls: Whitby (A), NOTL (B), Kitchener-Waterloo (C)