Preliminary rankings massively flawed?

by UxLax (Login UxLax)


Has anyone else noticed terrible flaws in there preliminary rankings?

For example in midget there are several teams listed that don't exist (Newmarket 2, kawartha lakes, orangeville 3, centre wellington 2, wallaceberg 2...and I assume even more)

Aswell, Orillia (ranked 3rd on MyLax) is placed in B.

Ive noticed this from looking for about 5 minutes. Has anyone else noticed that these rankings seem incredibly poorly done?

Posted on Jul 5, 2012, 12:20 AM
from IP address

Respond to this message

Return to Index

  1. Those are from March. Jim, Jul 5, 2012, 7:40 AM
    1. Re: Those are from March. J, Jul 5, 2012, 10:01 AM
      1. ratings are out. ratings, Jul 5, 2012, 10:26 AM
        1. Still waiting. PricklyThistle, Jul 5, 2012, 11:26 AM
        2. Mylax. steveo, Jul 5, 2012, 4:15 PM

Find more forums on LacrosseCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2015 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Tyke: Whitby (A), Oshawa (B), Barrie (C), Stars (D), Windsor (E)
Novice: Mimico (A), Innisfil (B), Orillia (C), Wallaceburg (D), Kawartha Lakes (E) Nepean (F)
Peewee: Whitby (A), Wallaceburg (B), Cambridge (C), Huntsville (D), London (E) NOTL (F)
Bantam: St. Catharines (A), Owen Sound (B), Oakville (C), Wallaceburg (D) Nepean (E)
Midget: Orangeville (A), Owen Sound (B), Cornwall (C), Orangeville (D)
Intermediate: Beaches (A), Six Nations (B), Sudbury (C)
Bantam Girls: Centre Wellington (A), Six Nations (B), Sarnia (C)
Midget Girls: Whitby (A), Hamilton (B), Sarnia (C)
Intermediate Girls: Whitby (A), NOTL (B), Kitchener-Waterloo (C)