Re: So why MyLax?

by bruins2011 (Login bruins2011)

Agree with the fact that # of plyrs,which ones are there or not there cant be calculated into every game. It gets kind of crazy, and goes to show that there prob is no perfect way to rank. The only question I brought up was the OLA contracted MyLax to do rankings, then when it comes time to set rankings for qualifiers,prov the scenarios are in some cases very different. eg. midgets, where #4,5 arent even in qualif rds of 13. I cld see if they sat 12,13th and got bumped. Again not want to debate whether they shld be there or not, just wondering how much the OLA wants us to bother with MyLax and what "real" value it has. Maybe it only made the rank issue more confusing for alot of people.

Posted on Jul 24, 2012, 8:28 AM
from IP address 174.140.182.7

Respond to this message

Return to Index

2011 PROVINCIAL CHAMPIONS

Tyke: Whitby (A), Kitchener (B), Burlington (C), Oshawa (D), Kahnawake (E)
Novice: Whitby (A), Six Nations (B), NOTL (C), West Durham (D), Newmarket (E)
Peewee: Whitby (A), Brampton (B), Toronto Stars (C), Kahnawake (D), Halton Hills 2 (E)
Bantam: Whitby (A), Mississauga (B), Kahnawake (C), Kitchener 2 (D)
Midget: Orangeville (A), Burlington (B), Arthur (C), Kawartha (D)
Intermediate: Brampton (A), Markham (B), Clarington 2 (C)