And neither am I. :)

The Bible is a source of information, "good and evil" one might say, as there are several technical inaccuracies and internal inconsistencies throughout its entirety -- oddly, the text itself (in Jeremiah) attests to such errors and falsification existing, with such as the result of deliberate tampering, no less -- but that notwithstanding, said "Scripture" at best remains only one source of information.

Myself, I prefer to nibble from many trees, absorbing nutrients ranging from Astronomy to Zoology and from Avalon to Zoaroster. This makes for a more nutritionally balanced diet, with offerings presented from around the globe (and across time) and written upon so much more lively a menu ... oops, sorry, it's just that when it comes to food for thought, I'm a glut, er, I get a bit carried away! :) Suffice it to say that I find such a diet much healthier than pecking away at the same ol' lifeless bark morning, noon, night, day after day, millennium after millennium ... 'tis better tastier, too! :)

As to your other comments ... matters appear to have gotten sidetracked in the discussion we were having about your global "think tank" idea ... and, honestly, I'm not at all sure where things went awry. To me, it seemed "reciprocation" was occurring fine, at least at first. Anyway, if I offended you in some way, all I can do is say that I'm sorry ... for such certainly was not my intention.

Oh well, maybe it's just the internet way of things ... it's fun while it lasts, but when does the fun ever last? Perhaps our thoughts will cross paths again in the future; until then, take it easy, Vince.


Don