The Global Military Forum
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Hiroshima and Nagasaki

August 9 2004 at 7:20 PM
No score for this post

  (Login hajaji)

 
This week 59 years ago USA bomb the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

What do U think about it from moral point of view?
Was it right or wrong to do?




 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply


(Login C.A.R.L.O)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
August 9 2004, 8:22 PM 


certainly acceptable to a utilitarian morale but not with any kind of idealist
value based morale conception.



    
This message has been edited by C.A.R.L.O on Aug 9, 2004 8:22 PM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

(Login Diunei)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
August 10 2004, 8:49 AM 

It was the right thing to do then and it would be the right thing to do today.  Don't forget that the Imperial Japanese were Nazis, they were making great efforts to deploy so-called WMD (chemical and biological weapons) against the US, Canada and Australia; we already know what they did to the rest of Asia.



    
This message has been edited by Diunei on Aug 10, 2004 8:49 AM


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login hajaji)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
August 11 2004, 12:11 PM 

Yea agree with U.
Unfortunately they did not drop some on the Germans.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Landos
(Login Landos)

Right thing, but terrible thing as well.

No score for this post
August 11 2004, 5:59 PM 

Dropping the atom bomb on Japan had to be done. There was no way the fanatic Japanese would have surrendered had we used only conventional weapons. They had to be convinced their nation was facing utter destruction.

An invasion of Japan would have resulted in many thousands of allied casualties and, perhaps, millions of Japanese casualties. It was no alternative to the bomb.

E Tan, E Epi Tas!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login Western_Commander)

Western_Commander

No score for this post
August 15 2004, 4:14 PM 

It was right to do, maybe today it wouldnt be becasue of the other nuclear retalitation, but i believe they deserved to be bombed more than twice.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

HBN
(Login HBN2025)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
August 15 2004, 5:37 PM 

More than twice?

No worry, we will do it more than twice when necessary lol





 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login Dukak)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
February 26 2005, 2:58 PM 

Doh throwing atom bomb to civil people to make their army surrender... lame and cowardness and nothing else

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login Paje_Brazil)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
February 26 2005, 10:16 PM 

Very right.The japoneses and the axis wanted to slave the others countries people for to work to them with out to pay the money of the non nippon workers.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login skrmha)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
February 27 2005, 1:44 AM 


vapourising hundreds of thousands civilians is being advocated.

even if we accept your theory correct about stopping nazi Japanes, first bomb would be enought to make Japanes surrender.

the second bomb was just pure primitiveness.

tx God they didnt have a third one at the time.

CoDeX [N]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.

Stealth-Man
(Login stealth-man)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
February 27 2005, 3:09 AM 

how can people justify the the use of atomic on civilian population.???
I agree with revisionist historians that the main reason was to end the war before russia was able to organize its army and open a front against japan...incase russia would stay once the war is over like eastern europe..

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.


(Login skrmha)

Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

No score for this post
February 27 2005, 7:35 AM 

exactly

japaneses had lost the ocean battle before A-bomb was droped. they lost almost all their navy force, lack of fuel and material while the USA was able to produce everything in mess production.

American victory was inevitable and this was known before 200.000 civilian people were vaporized by dammn A-Bomb

f.cking azz holez.

CoDeX [N]

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.
Current Topic - Hiroshima and Nagasaki  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Find more forums on Military, Law Enforcement and Emergency ServicesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement