The Bixography Discussion Group

A vehicle for Bixophiles and other interested individuals to ask questions, make comments and exchange information about Bix Beiderbecke and related subjects.

Any views expressed in the Bixography Forum represent solely the opinions of those expressing them and are not necessarily endorsed or opposed by Albert Haim unless he has signed the message.

I started archiving some of the threads that have been inactive for some time. The archived threads can be found at http://ms.cc.sunysb.edu/~alhaim/archivesforum.htm

Albert Haim, Forum Owner

html

wordpress analytics

Bing Crosby On BBC Radio 3

by

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/b006x41z/console

From Johm Petters in http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=37502171

"Famous for 'White Christmas' and his duet with David Bowie on 'Little Drummer Boy', Harrly Lillis Crosby, 1903 - 1977, Bing was one of the first white jazz vocalists, influenced by Louis Armsrtong and Bix Beiderbecke.

This edition of Jazz Library, hosted by Alyn Shipton with his guest, vocalist, Gwyneth Herbert, traces the Old Groaner's recordings from the early Paul Whiteman days in the late 1920s through to the 70s on a series of fine jazz recordings.

The Rhythm Boys, the vocal trio with whom Bing hit the big time with Whiteman are featured with Bix on 'From Monday On'.

A marvellous pairing of Bing with Duke Ellington's Orchestra in 1932 with,'St Louis Blues', demonstrates Bing's improvisational skills.

The classic anthem of the Depression, 'Brother Can You Spare A Dime', a scintillating duet with Connee Boswell and his brother, Bob's Bobcats, with Muggsy Spanier on 'Yes Indeed'.

The late guitar wizard, Les Paul, who died earlier this year is heard with Crosby on,'It's Been A Long Long Time'.

Proving that hot jazz remained with him throughout, there is a swinging collaboration with a small band led by Woody Herman and the classic pairing of Eddie Condon's drinking band, which included the great Wild Bill Davison on cornet and the amazing George Wettling on drums.

Bing and arguably the most important musicain of the 20th century, Louis 'Satchmo' Armstrong duet on the famous, 'Now You Has Jazz,Jazz, Jazz' from the hit movie, 'High Society''.

'Last Night on the Back Porch' features Bing with the west coast Dixieland style of Bob Scoby's Frisco Band, whilst 'They All Laughed' finds Crosby swinging a Gershwin evergreen with a splendid orchestra led by Buddy Bregman.

Bing with Billy May and Rosemary Clooney on a latin flavoured track, 'Brazil' emostrates another facet of the singer's talent.

Only weak point in the show was the dubious inclusion of the Bing /Bowie collaboration on the pretty awaful, 'Little Drummer Boy', which could not be classed as a jazz record by any yardstick.

Full marks, despite that, to Alyn & Gwyneth for a first class show."

Albert



Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 5:45 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Apeda Studio: The Fat Fiddler

by

From http://broadway.cas.sc.edu/index.php?action=showPhotographer&id=57

Apeda was a diversified corporate studio located in New York City and organized in 1906 by partners Alexander W. Dreyfoos and Henry Obstfield. From its organization it pursued two business strategies: shooting original portraiture and reproducing uncopyrighted images by other photographers of newsworthy scenes or celebrities under its own trade name. Dreyfoos was the head photographer and to him goes credit for developing sports portraiture as a field analogous to theatrical portraiture in its treatment and promotion. The studio became the primary metropolitan photographer of boxers and baseball players as well as a publicity manufacturer for Broadway performers. Apeda's great advantage among the New York metropolitan studios was its possession of industrial photograph developers and postcard printers. Whenever a New York photographer took a shot that they could not reproduce and market themselves or took a photograph that could not be copyright because there was no contract between photographer and sitter (the situation of flashlight stills of Broadway plays for instance), Apeda would secure a print, eradicate whatever name or trademark appeared on the print and affixed their own Apeda signature. In 1912 they began selling copies of White Studio's production stills for 'The Chorus Lady,' 'A Gentleman of Leisure,' 'Gentleman from Mississippi,' and 'Thais' under the Apeda name, provoking a law suit, White Studio v. Dreyfoos that Luther S. White would eventually lose. Like Underwood & Underwood, Apeda would buy up the entire production archive of photographers who had business difficulties or were moving to other parts of the country. Apeda, for instance, bought up the negatives of the Geisler-Andrews firm after the partners split. In the 1920s, the business was managed by Harold Danziger, whose background was in theater management. During the 1930s and 1940s, Apeda turned away from theatrical work to develop High School and Armed Services photography on a large scale. In the later 20th century, it was reorganized as Apco Apeda and operated until the 1990s when its New York headquarters had difficulties with the Environmental Protection Agency for chemical pollution.

We have had a tremendous number of Apeda photos in the forum. Here is one of Paul Whiteman. It is signed to Edward Werner. I looked up Edward Werner in Google and in Rayno's Whiteman biography. Zilch. Does anyone know who was Edward Werner and his connection to Whiteman?

[linked image]

Albert



Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 12:38 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Re: Edward Werner

by Chris Barry

There was an Edward Werner, also spelled Eduard Werner (b. 26 Dec. 1890 in Austria, d. Nov. 1982 per Census, WW1, SSDI) who was a longtime musician, theater orchestra leader, symphony conductor, union official and prosecutor in Detroit. Whiteman played the Michigan Theater in Detroit where Werner led the house band.

From Billboard Magazine, 6 Jan. 1945, pg. 21:
"Ed Werner Lays Down Law"
"DETROIT, Dec. 30. - Edward Werner, who directed the orchestra at the Michigan Theater here for a number of years, has been named assistant prosecuting attorney for Wayne County, which includes Detroit. Werner is now vice-president of Detroit Federation of Musicians."

From the Grosse Pointe News, Grosse Pointe, Michigan, 10 July 1947, pg. 13, col. 4:
"A recital of the experiences of an assistant prosecuting attorney in the county prosecutor's office, which Ed Werner gave before the Rotary Club Monday, abounded in humorous, human anecdotes.
"Werner, who began his career as a professional musician, turned to law later and is now in a position in which his native sense of humor enables him to appreciate to the full the endless procession of incidents which are part the daily work in a public prosecutor's office.
"The case of the woman who had been struck in the breast by a drunken husband and was nothing loath to show the evidence of the blow, [the] story of the foreigner who alternately denied and confirmed essential evidence and the case which Werner lost by not being able to produce the cigarette with which one party had deliberately burned the palm of another all kept the Rotarians convulsed with laughter."



Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 8:42 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


From Nick, two useful links

by

Thanks Nick. I enjoyed enormously the Abe Lincoln website (the second one, below) 

http://issuu.com/boxoffice/docs/boxoffice_061452/100

From the magazine "Box Office, The Pulse of the Movie Industry," Jume 14, 1952, In the section titled "Detroit" (p. 100),

"Lloyd Hammond, former independent film producer, was the major-domo for the big press party at the Pfeiffer Brewery Tuesday. Others present were ... Edward Werner, former musical director at the Michigan Theatre."

http://www.abelincolntrombone.com

This is a very informative site about trombonist Abram "Abe" Lincoln. Biography, articles, discography, photos (take a look at the photo section, Lisa), etc. Abe Lincoln replaced Tommy Dorsey in the California Ramblers and was a member of the Paul Whiteman, Leo Reisman and Roger Wolfe Kahn o orchestras in the 1930s. Abe Lincoln made recordings with, among others, Bing Crosby and Hoagy Carmichael (connections to Bix) in the 1930s and with Red Nichols in 1956. Here are a couple of relevant quotes from Floyd Levin's article.

"I left the Ramblers when I got a call from Detroit to join Sammy Dibert's band. Sammy played reeds and his brother John played banjo. They both came from Lancaster and worked in my brother Bud's band with me." While in Detroit, Abe sat in with the Goldkette orchestras, worked in the Michigan Theater Orchestra conducted by Ed Werner, and recorded Rossini's William Tell Overture. The record was later used as the radio theme song for the Lone Ranger when the program was launched in Detroit in 1930."

"The Dimick Orchestra [James B. Dimick's Million Dollar Sunny Brook Orchestra of Greensville, PA] traveled to Detroit to play the Arcadia Dance Hall and opened the Hollywood Theatre in Detroit with Richie Craig as the M.C. Note: Abe spent some, time in Detroit playing at the Arcadia, sitting in with the Goldkette bands, and then was with Ed Werner at the Michigan where Lou Kosloff guest conducted."

Paul Whiteman appeared twice (in the 1920s) in the Michigan Theater. The first time Nov 21- Nov 27, 1926. According to Don Rayno, Whiteman stopped, sometime during the week, perhaps Nov 25, by the Graystone Ballroom to catch the Jean Goldkette orchestra. The second time Oct 9-15, 1927. Paul could have signed the photo during any of the two engaements.

Albert

Here are two photos of the Michigan Theater (Wikipedia). In its splendor and now as a parking lot.

[linked image]

For Veniero. In the Floyd Levin article, I found the following sentence,

"Despite their name, the California Ramblers were not from the West Coast and never played there. The Ohio group was formed by banjoist Ray Kitchenman in 1921, and named after their early venue, the Ramblers Inn on Pelham Parkway, Bronx, New York. Violinist Arthur Hand was the leader. Ed Kirkeby, the group's manager/agent had extraordinary marketing skills and soon secured bookings for them in prestigious venues."

The banjoist's name has been spelled in several ways, Kitchingman, Kitchingham and now Kitchenman. The Ohio connection has to do with the fact that several of the first members of the band were from Ohio [from Lost Chords].



Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 5:03 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Listen to the First "Jazz" Recording by Abe Lincoln

by

From Rust's Jazz Discography

Ace Brigode And His Fourteen Virginians: Lucien Criner, Bud Lincoln (tp) Abe Lincoln (tb) Al Delaney (fhr) Ace Brigode (vn, ldr) Al Tresize, Cliff Gamet (cl,as) Eddie Allen (cl, ts) Ray Welch (vln) Frank Skinner, Nick Cortez (bj) Happy Masefiedd (tu) Fred Brohez (d) 

New York, June 2, 1925 Yes Sir, That's My Baby 

Lord gives Ace Brigode (cl, ldr) and Frank Skinner (p). 

Bud Lincoln was one of Abe's brothers. In Floyd Levin's article, Abe is quoted, "I had five brothers - three were musicians. Bud and Roy played trumpet, and Chet played trombone. My brother Bud would have been right up at the top of the trumpeter's [list] if he hadn't had a fatal accident. He was on a par with Phil Napoleon, leader of the Original Memphis Five, then the leading white jazz group in the country. Bud Lincoln formed a six piece band in 1921. He played trumpet and Abe was the fourteen year old trombonist. They took almost any job offered to them - strawberry festivals, dances, parties, picnics, college proms, etc. Bud was six years older than me. He went to the dances, heard all the bands and brought the tunes home for me to learn."  

The 1910 US Census lists John Lincoln 38, living with wife Ella 34, sons Raymond 16, Robert 14, Victor 7, Abraham 3, Chester 8 months, and daughter Mary 10. In the 1920 US Census Victor is 17 and Abraham 12 (and another son, Roy 8). I guess Bud was Victor. 

From jazz on line (Who plays the solo at about 1:30 and what instrument does he play?) Nice, peppy recording. 

   or copy and paste www.jazz-on-line.com/a/mp3w/1925_118.mp3 

According to Rust's Dance band discography, the first recording ever by Abe Lincoln took place on Oct 13, 1924. It was "Bye, Bye, Baby." 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 27, 2009 10:06 AM
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 27, 2009 9:08 AM

Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 8:59 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Listen to the First "Jazz" Recording by Abe Lincoln

by Nick Dellow

The instrument you ask about is a bass clarinet.

By the way, this recording (labelled on English Columbia as by the Denza Dance Band, a pseudonym that covered a multitude of American bands) was the first encounter that Brian Rust ever had with anything approaching "jazz"! He was three or four years old at the time when his cousin gave it to him "amongst a gramophone and a bunch of records". Brian is now 87.



Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 10:24 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Red Nichols-Abe Lincoln Sessions of 1956

by

Steve H kindly sent scans of two pages from "The Red Nichols Story: After Intermission, 1942-1965" by Philip R. Evans, Stanley Hester, Stephen Hester and Linda K. Evans, Studies in Jazz, The Scarecrow Press, 1997   with detailed information about the sessions.

[linked image]

[linked image]

Thanks, Steve.

Albert



Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 4:06 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I believe that the first recording of ....

by

.... Red Nichols and Abe Lincoln together is "T.N.T" by the Varsity Eight, c. Jan 1, 1926. Also in the recording, according to Rust,  Bobby Davis, Arnold Brilhart, Sam Ruby, Adrian Rollini, Irving Brodsky, Tommy Fellini and Stan King. According to Ate van Delden in the liners for the Timeless "Varsity Eight" CD, the bass saxophonist is not Adrian Rollini.

Listen to this nice recording.

       or copy and paste   bixography.com/TNTVarsityEight.mp3

Albert

 

 



Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 4:53 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: I believe that the first recording of ....

by m karoub

agreed --not adrian , wonder who subbed bass sax on the date..(& why) adrian grasped idea of how to swing instantly- this guy doesnt....

somewhere i have a battered cameo 78 of Milenberg Joys Varsity 8-great solos by Abe Lincoln and adrian rollini.
listening to early Lincoln sort of a 3d way independent of Teagarden-(who wouldnt be on record or in nyc for a couple of years) and Mole -


Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 5:40 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I agree, ....

by

.... clearly not Adrian Rollini. Not Spencer Clark either. Who could it be?

Here is "Milenberg Joys" by the Varsity Eight, (Roy Johnston, Abe Lincoln, Bobby Davis, Arnold Brilhart, Sam Ruby, Adrian Rollini (this time the real thing), Irving Brodsky, Tommy Felline, Stan King).

Ate comments about the magnificent solo by Adrian, and mentions the quote of Massenet's "Thais." I think the few interpolated notes come around 2:20-2:23. Listen

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 28, 2009, 6:48 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Roy Johnston's trumpet comes in ....

by

... before Adrian ends his solo. Is this on purpose or in error?

I forgot to mention the nice solo by Abe Lincoln; indeed, Mike, neither Molian nor Teagardian.

Albert



Posted on Dec 28, 2009, 6:54 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Thais

by

Ironically enough, it was Rollini's inclusion of "Thais" that led me to investigate the REAL Meditation by Massenet years ago when the Varsity Eight CD was released. I suppose it would have been more amusing if I had known of the original first, then heard the quotation in...Milenburg Joys of all places?!? happy.gif

Posted on Dec 28, 2009, 12:41 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


WBIX # 170

by

Radio Program # 170. (loaded on 12/26/09)   Bix's recordings played by other American bands. 61.04 min

Real Audio      
Streaming audio file.   Download file.   14.2 MB   

mp3 files   Streaming mp3 file   
http://bixography.com/wbixmp3/wbix170.m3u
  

   55.9 MB or copy and paste bixography.com/wbixmp3/wbix170.mp3  

My Pet.
Sam Lanin's Troubadours. May 10. 1928. Vocal by Scrappy Lambert.
Sweet Sue.
Sam Lanin's Troubadours. May 10. 1928. Vocal by Scrappy Lambert.
The Man I Love. Fred Rich and His Orchestra. Dec 10, 1927. Vocal by Vaughn de Leath.
You Took Advantage of Me.
Fred Rich and His Orchestra. May 4, 1928.. Vocal by James Melton.
My Ohio Home. Sam Lanin and His Orchestra. Dec 29, 1927. Vocal by Scrappy Lambert.
The Man I Love. Sam Lanin's Famous Players. Dec 9, 1927. Vocal by Irving Kaufman.
Dusky Stevedore.
Louisiana Rhythm Kings. (Coon-Sanders Nighhawks.) Aug 13, 1928. Vocal by Harry Maxfield.
Rhythm King.
Coon-Sanders Nighhawks. Dec 12, 1928. Vocal by Carleton Coon.
Chloe. Sam Lanin's Famous Players and Singers. Jan 25, 1928. Vocal by Irving Kaufman.
Sunday. Broadway Bellhops. Oct 22, 1926.
Vocal by Irving Kaufman. Albert

WBIX #171 will be uploaded on Jan 28, 2010.

Albert

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 26, 2009 7:27 AM
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 26, 2009 7:23 AM

Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 7:20 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Stardust ~ just for fun

by

I've always loved this Nat King Cole version of the great Hoagy tune, especially when I was reminded of it when the movie "Sleepless In Seattle" came out. In case you've never heard it (which I doubt) I'm sending it as a link. It's worth seeing as it's a tribute to Hoagy accompanied by real "stardust" images from the Hubble telescope.
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=DtZKwp6cjd4&mode=related&search

All the best,
Jim Petersen


Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 2:38 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Stardust link

by

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xARHXe4CCI

I couldn't get to Stardust through your link, Jim - think this
one might work! Thanks for mentioning it - it's beautiful -
Merry Christmas!
- Lisa

Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 5:01 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Excellent youtube item. Thanks, Jim.

by

Star Dust is one of the masterpieces of all time. It can be interpreted as a ballad, as jazz, to create a mood, etc. I understand that there are over 5,000 recordings of the tune. If you listened to one recording a day, it would take over 10 years to listen to them all.

Albert



Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 3:50 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Stardust ~ Try this one!

by

I hope this one works, I really like it as it also shows Hoagy at various stages of his career. It's entirely different than the one Lisa was nice enough to post. I don't know why, but the "?" was dropped from the link in my first post.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtZKwp6cjd4&mode=related&search

Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 2:19 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


What neat Bix item have you gotten recently?

by

As the Christmas season is a time for giving and receiving I thought I would share with the group a neat Bix item I won on ebay recently. I have looked for this Metronome magazine from 1938 with Bix on the cover for a long time. It finally showed up on ebay and I won it as the single bidder. Odd, because I thought other Bix fans would have given me some pretty stiff competition for this item. Maybe others would like to share their recent Bix items that they got: magazine, cd or other.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=310188755225&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT#ht_500wt_979

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 2:07 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

The Bix-related item I will be getting ...

by

That's quite a score, Linda - very cool! (is it OK to use the
word "cool"?)
A couple of weeks ago I accidentally unearthed a Christmas present
that I know is intended for me ... a cornet! Given the fact that I have
never played an instrument (beyond sporadic piano lessons in the 1950's)
... what exactly I'm supposed to DO with a cornet is unclear ...

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 5:23 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix-related item

by

On thanksgiving, my son's father-in-law gave me a hard styrofoam hat (that looks like a straw hat) with "Bix Lives" on the head band. He also gave me a Q. C. Times newspaper section that covered the 1980 Davenport Bix Fest.
I was struck by the large size of the audiences AND the almost negative way Bix was written about (over emphazing the drinking and his being a "black sheep" etc.) However, the articles did praise Bix's playing and composing. As I read the articles, I thought, "No wonder we're still fighting the unfair stero-type of Bix around here!"
I hope everyone has a wonderful Christmas season and that 2010 will be a great one for you and yours.

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 8:03 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Merry Christmas to all Bix fans worldwide!

by

Here is my new transfer on youtube of "Concerto In F" as a little Christmas present for all Bix fans worldwide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDFjNpq-F6s&feature=PlayList&p=38497AB97AD9C463&index=0&playnext=1

The above playlist plays all 6 records one after the other (23 minutes).

I used the UK Columbia issue for my transfers which means that "Part 6: Finale - Allegro Con Brio" is take 3 unlike the version on the American Potato Head Label issue (Columbia 50141-D) which is take 7. The entire UK version was recorded on September 15 and September 17, 1928 but take 7, used for the American issue, was recorded on October 5, 1928 (more than 2 weeks later with George Gershwin in the studio!).

Some people think that the second 10 bar harmon mute solo at the beginning of side 4 was played by Bix. Well, I don't... Nevertheless, Bix was present when this wonderful piece of music was recorded!

I think "Concerto In F" and "Rhapsody In Blue" as performed in the 1920s are wonderful examples to illustrate what Whiteman was after...

Hope you enjoy!


Emrah

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 10:36 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

New link

by

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M86vqy-xIr8&feature=PlayList&p=38497AB97AD9C463&index=0

Emrah

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 9:25 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


More Christmas Greetings!

by

There have been countless attempts to bring together Jazz and serious music. Dare I venture to suggest Concerto in F gets as near as it ever will do? We get so used to hearing Gershwin as a composer of popular songs. Concerto in F has been somewhat neglected over the years in favor of the better known Rhapsody in Blue. Meanwhile from a snowy London, a Happy Christmas to one and all in the States and everywhere else too.

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 3:24 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Buying CDs, Ripping, Burning, Downloading, or Streaming?

by

In http://www.jazzwax.com/2009/12/sunday-wax-bitx.html

 

Marc Myers discusses how people might be listening to music in the future. Streaming services is one way to go. This was also discussed in a New York Times article

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/05/technology/companies/05apple.html?scp=3&sq=streaming%20&st=cse

 

where it is reported that Apple stroke a deal to buy Lala, a music start-up company.

 

There are advantages to having available on streaming an enormous music collection. You dont have to buy and burn CDs, download music and store several gigabytes in your computer. You can choose to listen to any recording at home, in your car, or via your mobile device.

 

When you listen to the radio, you are at the mercy of the broadcaster. Pandora has gone a step further in the direction of personal choice -you can choose a particular artist and have his/her music stream into your computer. But still, you do not have a choice of individual songs. The future may bring us that. In fact, the present has done that for selected 1920s music - note the redhotjazz archive and jazz-on-line collections of jazz and dance band music.

 

Of course, collectors of 78s will not be deterred. Owning the object is part (or for some people, most) of the charm.

 

Albert







    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 21, 2009 4:43 AM

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 4:42 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

78rpm records

by Andy Schumm

A nice, clean 78 sounds better than any CD reissue or transfer. That's also part of the charm!

Andy

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 11:01 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: 78rpm records

by hal smith

That's not that easy to find.

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 10:09 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: 78rpm records

by Andy Schumm

That's the fun in it!

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 10:58 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Medium Is the Message

by

(Thank you Marshall McCluhan!). Playing a 78 is a distinctly different aesthetic experience than listening to the same recording transferred to another medium.

First, you have to pay attention at least every three minutes, to drop and remove the needle from the groove. The labor-intensity of this heightens one's awareness of each song, which is lost when using, say, an iPod.

The act of removing the record from its sleeve, hefting it, bearing the awful responsibility of not dropping it, placing it on the turntable, watching it rotate at that highly kinetic speed - adds another sense of urgency and particularity to each tune.

The realization that the record is an artifact of its original time and place, that the groove is a virtual molecular replication of the original wax master, enhances the feeling of connection to that time and place and to the artists.

We experience the sound in realtime, which puts the "now" into direct synchrony with the "then," and wipes out all temporal distinctions. This is known as "Time Travel," and when combined with all the above completes uniqueness of playing a 78.

-Brad Kay

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 12:19 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


wow

by

Beautifully said.

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 2:13 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A ritual

by

I prefer the sound quality of a record to a restored CD recording because the sound is much more direct and real. Nevertheless, it depends also on the label you are playing. An electrical OKeh in E+ without any blemishes doesn't need that much restoration work anyway. In case of an acoustical recording, it might be different. Many of them have a lot of noise in the background which is removable and the sound is clearly better (the Perfects for instance).

What Brad describes in his above post is some kind of a ritual which I know pretty well. You can't just push the button and there is "light", you have actually to work for the music! This is meditation... :-D You have to stand up, go to the record shelf, pick a record, look at it (see the click here and there on the shellac, have a closer look to the nice label), pick your stylus if necessary etc...

A CD or an iPod ca never replace this ritual...

Emrah


Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 2:24 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Why I Don't Collect '78s

by Andrew Vaaler

I can understand the charms of collecting 78's, but I don't intend to start.

I'll take your word that the listening experience is different, maybe superior in many cases. And I can understand the thrill of collecting: the search, the find, the bargaining, the feel of the record. All that. It's good stuff, no doubt. Boy I love being around collectors when they play them, and watching their faces light up.

But without digital transfers, I wouldn't be able to listen to the music as frequently or as loudly as I do. And then there is the distinct pleasure of listening to the music while going for a walk, run, or bike-ride. One more thing: I also like listening to this music in the "shuffle" mode on the iPod for a compare/contrast experience with random tunes.

I won't mention that 78's generally cost more per tune than transfers, and that they take up an awful lot of space. This I will not mention, the cost and space issue.

So shoot me, but at least you won't have to worry about me out-bidding you on the next Claxtonola up for grabs.



Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 12:20 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Ipod spinning session.

by Bridget

I had a swell Ipod Listening session with the members of the West End Jazz Band this past Nov when they played here in Washington. It was fantastic when, as as a non-record collector, I actually got to share some tunes I love with other old jazz geeks. A listening session is a great 'Show and Tell' where you have the opportunity to turn someone on to a new take, or can discover a new band, no matter what the media, with your musical compatriots.
Thanks to my fellow Bix fans for that!

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 1:10 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: The Medium Is the Message

by Andy Schumm

Well put!

There's nothing wrong with listening to iPods and CDs. I enjoy that too. It's nice when you're on the run, or if you're transcribing a solo. (Don't wear out that Paramount...it doesn't need the help.) But as Brad has already stated, you have to be active in order to listen to the real thing. If you're not careful when listening to digital media, you run the risk of "hearing" and not "listening."

(I'd be careful about showing up with an iPod at an IAJRC convention though.....haha)

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 2:03 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Does the rite of playing a 78 rpm record ....

by

.... include using an acoustic machine? I am not much of a collector of 78s ( I have a few  hundred, compared to several thousand for real collectors), but when I play them, I use a Victrola Consolette 7313 with an orthophonic reproducer. The experience is quasi-psychedelic.

Do you guys use modern equipment with electric turntables, magnetic cartridges, and electronic amplification? If you do (which would save tear and wear on the records), does the modern equipment take away from the "experience" of traveling back in time? By the way, my favorite time machine is sound film, your can hear and see the past.

Albert

 PS I do not want to detract from your excellent posting, Brad. However, at the risk of sounding pedantic, let me point out that your statement "the groove is a virtual molecular replication of the original wax master" is only approximately accurate. I am glad you used the word "virtual" (in essence, but not in actual fact). The actual molecular compositions of wax and shellac are radically different, so the groove on the shellac could not be an exact molecular replication of the original wax master, and even with the word virtual, the use of the phrase a "virtual molecular replication" may be a bit of a stretch. The undulating V-groove inscribed on the shellac is an exact physical copy of the groove on the wax: the undulations created on the wax by capturing the sound waves are replicated precisely on the shellac.



Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 4:24 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I use both

by

In order to make cd-R's out of my 78 collection, so that I can protect the recordings from the danger of becoming obsolete due to a damaged or cracked disc,, I do use a modern -- or, more explicitly, contemporary to the later 20th century - turntable and receiver. The aural bloom is quite faithful, with a lush resonance, on early electronics (a much-loved term of description I like is "tubby bass"), and the reproduction on acoustics is very satisfactory. Ours is not at all a particularly state-of-the-art sound system or the latest word in sophisticated engineering, the various appliances of turntable and speakers dating from the very late 60's and early 1970's, hooked with a complementing cd recorder and receiver of much more recent vintage -- and carefully kept in good repair, replacing needles and so forth, but it's not exactly a Close-'N'-Play children's toy phonograph (hey, any of you Baby Boomers out there remember those?)either. I'm utterly disgusted by the sound reproduction -- or NON-reproduction, cheaply tinny as it is -- of those novelty Crosley record players which went on the market earlier in this decade -- the only purpose they serve is cute decoration, nothing more. We stupidly bought one some years ago and now it sits in the basement; sometimes just for the hell of it I'll play records on it while I'm doing laundry.

But, I don't know if I blabbed this around yet, when my husband's parents moved to their retirement community last month, splashy and nice as their new place is, they didn't have room for a lot of their old things and had Rick and his sister and brothers pick out whatever furniture they wanted. We jumped at the Victrola of Grandpap Dominic's, along with his inherited 78's record collection, and with help from a teenage neighborhood boy lugged it from the car into our house, where it stands in stately dignity in our living room. It works perfectly and is used cautiously; having never been restored but just carefully maintained, even if played more than occasionally, and we're rsearching further how to best care for this marvelous item. It's 90 years old (I looked it up and it is an upright model dating from circa 1919).

This is an acoustical phonograph, obviously, for Orthophonics didn't come out until the later 1920's -- no cord to plug in; and a crank to wind it up and start the turntable moving. It's certaily a Victor with the Nipper the Dog picture trademark inside of the lid. On it, electric 78's are somewhat lacking in resonance, despite their pronounced blare when the little speaker doors are opened (it plays surprisingly loudly!) Acoustical records give, I think, the most accurate and faithful sound reproduction -- played on what they were meant to be played on. The hiss and crackle of all surface noise is much amplified and despite the distinctly wooden, even boxy characterization of aural ambience combined with the inevitable shellac surface noise of discs more than 80 years old -- even though Dominic kept his records in particularly good condition, clean and not a scratch on them; this dark wood Victrola cabinet glows with polish, too and is very nearly impecccable, with a supply of needles in little packets -- a listener gets an accurate impression of how such records originally sounded, much more than just a ghostly hint of what they were supposed to have sounded like. The dry woody tone is a distinct characteristic of acoustical phonographs/gramophones, however on wants to refer to a machine which plays disc records. When one listens to -- and watches! the records being played on the very old phonographs on those YouTube selections, it's very apparent on hearing that the quality if fidelity differs much from the "remastered from metal stampings" cd issues, or even the lp releases of over 30 years ago made of restored, historical jazz and pop. Over YouTube the sound on old Victrolas is somewhat thinner; the treble more pronounced, and of course no way of adjusting any controls to plump up bass and so forth; on computer speakers I can't really determine if an Orthophonic used in some selections would have a heavier bass tone.

It's wonderful to play 78 records on both.

Laura

Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 8:09 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Does the rite of playing a 78 rpm record ....

by m karoub

to respond -- I once had set up w/dual turntable different styli-marvelous if you had a mint 78...

i have a Victor credenza-but the Consolette W/restored Orthophonic repro is the workhorse sometimes w/thorn needles.--I fi had the cleanest known copy of a rare record i wouldnt play on vintage equipment -but a restored orthophonic is high ed audio just old...

i might only have 5 minutes to spin a record- playing one side you give recording your full attention- i honestly think i would become distracted after 40 minutes of (lets say) memphis 5 on cd -78s sort of forced us to be aware of every detail on a record--.. i might point out though the best restorations davies keiffer etc made you feel like you were listening to mint 78s at a friends hse. i think we enjoy different kinds of playback for different reasons.

Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 5:53 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Nice Responses, All

by

Thanks for all the varied responses to my small polemic. I play my 78s on a more-or-less modern electronic system assembled over the years. My aim is to recreate the original acoustics of the room in which the recording took place. This requires equalization - a developed skill tantamount to learning a musical instrument.

All old records have built-in harmonic distortion. The acoustic horns and the early microphones left all kinds of peaks and resonances in the recordings that lay listeners might call "tinny" or "muffled" or "boomy." With skilful use of equalization, these faults can be pinpointed and corrected, leaving something like a flat, transparent frequency response. Then we can hear the spatial relationships of the musicians to each other, and to the room they're in.

I do have a wind-up morning-glory horn acoustic phonograph which has been "hot-rodded' for maximum listening pleasure. It's a 1907 Mercedes machine, modified with a 1916 double-spring Victrola motor, and a 1930 Victor Orthophonic reproducer, for maximum pitch stability and fidelity. It plays like gangbusters within its limited frequency spectrum, with a sort of one-size-fits-all flattening out of the resonances. Vocalists sound especially good, with a kind of projectile intensity. Caruso sounds like he's standing in the room, rather than emanating from the horn. I've learned how to get a similar kind of intensity from the electronic system as well, which also includes full frequency range.

Albert, by "virtual molecular replication" of the record groove, of course I meant an exact replica of the original wax, pressed in shellac or vinyl. Molecular replication takes place during the plating process, when the metal masters are formed on the original wax, in the electrolytic bath, molecule by molecule. The surface of a metal "mother," viewed under an electron microscope, will still be perfectly smooth, compared to a shellac pressing, which at that magnification would reveal myriad imperfections. Playing such a disc is the ultimate 78 listening experience.

-Brad Kay

Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 10:17 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


"Body and Soul"

by

Tom Lord in his latest newsletter,

"According to todays count in The Jazz Discography, the #1 recorded jazz tune of all time is Body And Soul 1947 occurrences in our database."

Maybe if one is restricted to the listings in the Jazz Discography, but how about the most recorded tune of all time? I think it is Hoagy's Star Dust.

Did you know that Annette Hanshaw has a magnificent version of the great tune Body and Soul? Recorded on Oct 7, 1930.

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/hanshaw/bodyandsoul.ram

Paul Whiteman recorded Body and Soul on Oct 10,1930.

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/whiteman/bodysoul.ram

According to jazzstandards.com,

While in London, Hollywood songwriter/conductor Johnny Green wrote Body and Soul for Gertrude Lawrence. Jack Hylton & His Orchestra recorded the ballad first in Britain, but it was Paul Whiteman and His Orchestra (Jack Fulton, vocal) who popularized it. Their recording hit the charts on October 11, 1930, and held the number one spot for six weeks.

Here is Jack Hylton's version of  July 2, 1930.

http://www.jazz-on-line.com/ram/VIC36027x.ram

Also from jazzstandards.com

On October 15th, 1930, Body and Soul appeared in the Broadway revue, Threes a Crowd. The show would run for 272 performances with Libby Holman performing the song as Clifton Webb [my favorite Clifton Webb movie is "Laura'] danced. Body and Soul was one of the revues standout songs, and Holmans recording rose to number three on the recording charts.

Here is Libby Holman's version, Oct 1930.

http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/rama/BRU34706.ram

I like the Benny Goodman Trio's version of Jul 13, 1935. This is from the first recording session ever by the Trio, Benny, Teddy Wilson and Gene Krupa.

http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/ramc/VIC92705-1.ram

Louis Armstrong recorded the tune on Oct 9, 1930. I believe this was not released until 1932.

http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/ramw/1932_073.ram

Of course, there is the legendary version by Coleman Hawkins of  Oct 11, 1939. According to John Chilton, "Hawk decided to treat the song informally, making it a two-chorus ballad feature for himself.... Backed by what was the simplest of arrangements, Coleman Hawkins achieved the apotheosis of his entire career, creating a solo that remains the most perfectly conceived and executed example of jazz tenor-sax playing ever recorded."

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/misc/bodyandsoul.ram

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 18, 2009 7:00 AM

Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 5:52 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Re: "Body and Soul"

by Nick Dellow

It's true that Jack Hylton and his Orchestra recorded "Body And Soul" first in Britain, on February 7th, 1930 (with a 12 inch concert version recorded on February 25th), but it was Ambrose's version that first popularised the tune over here. Ambrose and his Orchestra recorded the song just one day after Hylton's band, on February 8th, 1930 (MB-941-3), and again on February 22nd, 1930 (MB-941-5). Both takes were issued on the Decca Magenta series, with the catalogue number M-118. I do not know whether the Hylton version was released before the Ambrose version, but I do know that Ambrose's version was a huge hit and it is the only Decca M series record that turns up with any degree of frequency! Such was its popularity that Ambrose re-recorded the number for Brunswick/Decca on March 20th, 1933 (catalogue number Br 1485/Dec F-6143, re-issued as Dec F-7202). It remained in the Decca catalogue until the end of the 78 era.

My favourite version of "Body And Soul" is the one by Spike Hughes and his Decca-Dents, recorded on March 12th, 1930, and featuring some lovely playing by Sylvester Ahola.

I'm rather surprised that the number one recorded jazz tune of all time isn't "Tiger Rag" or "Saint Louis Blues"!



Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 9:55 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


07/02/30 Not July!

by

I had the date for the first recording of "Body and Soul" from the magnificent jackhylton.com website. But these Brits give the date starting with the day and following with the month. I interpreted 07/02/30 as July 2, 1930. Wrong. It is Feb 7, 1930!

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 11:46 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Through the generosity of Nick, ....

by

.... here is an mp3 file of the recording of "Body and Soul" by Spike Hughes and His Decca Dents. This comes from Nick's own 78. Recorded on March 11, 1930. The Decca Dents are Sylvester Ahola, t; Philip Buchel, as; Stan Andrews, vn; Eddie Carroll, p; Leslie Smith, g; Spike Hughes, sb, dir, arr; Val Rossing, d, vocal. Note there is no trombone. Is it fair to say that some/several 1920s/1930s British dance bands did not use trombones?

If the music does not begin to stream as you open the posting, copy and paste the following.

bixography.com/BodyandSoulSpikeHughes.mp3

Thanks very much Nick. Great recording.

Albert



Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 4:45 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


WaPo on "The Birth (And Death) of the Cool"

by

In this morning's Post, Carolyn See reviews Ted Gioia's "The Birth (And Death) of the Cool," which features a chapter on Bix Beiderbecke. From the review:

"The author is a musician, music historian and very active businessman. Thus, he's looking at the world through a pair of spectacles with two very different lenses: jazz and commerce. As far as I can see, his perceptions and insights about jazz, the actual 'birth of the cool' (as a mind-set as well as a point of view about musicianship) are flawless. His chapters on Beiderbecke, Young and Davis are what reviewers like to call lapidary; they are jewel-like, particularly the pages about Miles playing with Charlie Parker in the early New York days. The prose is so strong, simple and evocative that it brings the reader almost to tears with longing. What wonderful nights! What insanely terrific music! What a marvelously enchanted meeting of minds and sensibilities! The book is worth much more than its price for these three chapters alone."

Read the full review here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/17/AR2009121704289.html

Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 5:05 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

I don't agree with Ted ....

by

.... that Bix was "cool." Neither in the style of his playing, nor in his personality (of course, as far as I can tell from what people who knew him said about him). Ted deserves a complete explanation since what he wrote in his book is thoughtful and significant. It will be very difficult and time-consuming to provide a satisfactory response. I hope to be able to do it. For the time being, I will provide a brief account.

Bix as a predecessor of "cool jazz." Perhaps in some of his recordings, Bix displays the restraint that has been taken to be a characteristic, a fingerprint if you like, of the "cool jazz" style. But that is far from what is needed to identify Bix as a cat who blows cool. Restraint is just one aspect of Bix's style (and not always; think of "From Monday On," most of his recordings with His Gang, etc) First, note that Bix's playing is filled with strong and deep emotions - what Sudhalter describes as layered and complex. Second, and this is very important, there is what I would call the "content" of his music, new melodies improvised over the chord structure of the tune, and new improvisations in every take. Just the fact that he did not play the same thing twice shows, to me at least, that he was not approaching his music in a cerebral (cool) manner, but in an impetuous way, conveying what he was feeling at different times. I imagine that people describe Bix's style as restrained, in part, because Bix is often compared with Louis Armstrong, the other cornetist/genius of the 1920s. Of course, in comparison with hot Louis the extrovert, Bix is cold and introvert. Would we view Bix as "cool" if Louis had not dominated jazz since the 1920s? I don't know, but I doubt it.

Bix as a cool guy. To me, a cool guy is supremely confident and gregarious, his life is focused in the external world, not in his internal life. A cool guy is not consumed by a passion for his chosen field of endeavor; on the conrrary, his life is filled with superficial fun. My vision of a cool guy is Paul Newman in "Hud." Although Bix was friendly, I doubt that he was gregarious. Bix was consumed by his passion for music, almost to the exclusion of other activities - several people who knew Bix are witnesses of Bix's fascination, perhaps obsession, with music. Bix was not very talkative. If we take Sylvester Ahola's recollection of Bix ("I am a musical degenerate"), we would infer that Bix  was not a confident guy. Thus, Bix lacks several of the attributes that I view essential in describing a guy a s cool.

I hope this provides a preliminary explication of why I don't view Bix as a cool guy, either musically or in his personality. If I have a chance, and if necessary, I will expand.

Albert



Posted on Dec 19, 2009, 11:33 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix & The Cool

by

Thanks for the response, Albert. Have you read Gioia's book, or at least his chapter on Bix? I ask because you don't seem interested in the terms that Gioia lays out in his argument regarding both cool jazz and, more generally, the cool aesthetic. I acknowledge that it's pretty vague to talk about what's cool and what's not cool, and I think it's perfectly valid for you to have your own idea of cool (in this case, Newman in Hud) and then assert that Bix ain't that. But with all respect it's not a valid response to Gioia's argument. He defines cool, then argues that Bix is that. I wonder, then, how you would respond to the specifics of what Gioia is arguing about Bix & cool.

As best I can, I'll summarize his argument.

In defining the white jazz player of the nineteen-twenties and beyond as "cool" he highlights the following:

* He was "the outsider among outsiders," this self-imposed alienation putting him at a "far remove from social norms and expectations";

* Even if he's a child of privilege, he sees himself as misunderstood, an underdog;

* Even if he achieves great success, he still sees himself as misunderstood, an underdog;

* His art dictates his response to the world (e.g., he is spontaneous and flouts rules);

* "He values experience the way a banker hordes capital";

Gioia then says that Bix is a fascinating example of this "cool" character.

* He's at odds with the values of his bourgeois family (re jazz, school, alcohol);

* "He prefers to find himself, to follow his own muse";

* "He embraces the most raucous and uninhibited music he can find, not just for how it sounds, but also as a symbol of his way of life";

* He embraces art and intellect (Gioia cites the Eddie Condon anecdote about Bix reading Proust);

* His early life circumstances are unpromising in terms of artistic greatness, yet "he not only transformed himself, but exerted a magnetic pull on those around him";

(Still does, I'd argue!)

Gioia mentions that the "ultimate test of cool, of course, is the ability to maintain the pose even in the face of physical danger," and then retells Mezz Mezzrows anecdote regarding Bix drinking contentedly on the tracks despite an oncoming train. And Gioia acknowledges Bix's singular obsession with his music.

So this is how he argues that Bix was a "cool guy." He then proceeds to argue that he also was a progenitor of cool music. To define him as such, he highlights the following:

* Cool jazz would have been considered an oxymoron in the nineteen-twenties;

* But the distinction between Louis Armstrongs approach to jazz and Bixs approach is where one first sees the idea of cool in jazz. Armstrong is about virtuosity, Bix about tone.

* Bix helps to invent the jazz ballad style, which "aims more to move the listener's heart than the dancer's feet";

* Bix's solos still have edge and syncopation, "but there is something else, a looser conception, more relaxed and tender, that breaks free of precedents and instead looks toward the future";

* Bix influences (either directly or indirectly) such musicians as Bing Crosby, Artie Shaw, and Lester Young -- helping critics to draw a line from Bix to the cool jazz of the late thirties and forties (this is especially true with Young);

* Bix's piano music explores "the same pathways that the cool jazz musicians of the fifties would later travel";

By Gioia's definition of cool, Bix's obsession with improvisation makes him cool; it doesn't prevent him from being cool, as you have it. His cerebral approach makes him cool; it doesn't prevent him from being cool. That Bix is an introvert compared to Louis Armstrong is the whole point. The distinction between their approaches to the music helped define the hot and cool styles for future generations.

I write all this not to endorse Ted Gioia's argument. I just want us to be on the same page regarding what he actually writes.

In the meantime, happy holidays to you, and I hope youre not snowed under up in New York like we are down in Virginia.

Posted on Dec 19, 2009, 1:28 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Bix & The Cool

by

Of course I read the chapter on Bix, as well as several other chapters in The Birth (and Death) of the Cool. I also read Teds chapter in The Oxford Companion to Jazz, Edited by Bill Kirchner, 2000.  In this chapter, Ted already brings up Bix as a practitioner of cool. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

One of the reasons I did not directly spoke to Teds definition of "cool" is that there is no crisp statement in his book of what are the characteristic aspects of the "cool style" (as a personality). I am not the first one to make this point. I quote from the review in 

http://www.citypaper.com/arts/story.asp?id=19283

"In this regard, one challenge that we face is that he never offers a concrete definition of "cool." The following is about as close as he comes, first in the positive, then in the negative:

 

Cool was defined by its reliance on image and irony, by its artifice and playful fluidity. It was marked, above all, by an outward focus on trends and fashions. The notion of lifestyle--a term that hardly existed outside of academic literature during the first half of the twentieth century--became of paramount import during the Age of Cool, and the idea that once could shape one's persona and way of living as though they were works of art (a foreign concept to most people during the Great Depression) became widespread. Postcool, in contrast, is built on a new earnestness and directness, a celebration of simplicity and authenticity. Irony is out; plainspokenness is in. The natural and down-to-earth are preferred to the glitzy and fashionable. The real is valued above the contrived, honesty above artifice. Communications--from the simple text message to the spin-doctoring of prominent pundits on the boob tube--are quicker and to the point. Postcool is less exciting than cool, but more practical and results oriented. It's less malleable and fluid, but far more predictable in its behavior patterns.

Yet the shift to a postcool mentality is not without its downsides. Above all, many problems are created when society loses its cool. The directness and bluntness of postcool life are only a step away from outright hostility and confrontation." 

 

If "It (cool) was marked, above all, by an outward focus on trends and fashions" is taken as a crucial aspect of Teds definition of "cool," then certainly, Bix was not cool. Bix's key characteristic was his inward focus on the music within himself, and how he would express such music through his playing of cornet and piano. I don't see any interest on the part of Bix on "trends and fashions."

 

Going on the postcool, Ted writes that it is "a celebration of simplicity and authenticity" and The real is valued above the contrived, honesty above artifice. Well, that is exactly what Bix did. His music was authentic, honest. There was supreme creativity and authencitiy in Bixs music; he did not have to hide behind artifice.

 

I disagree with one of  Teds statements that you quote in your post, namely, "He embraces the most raucous and uninhibited music he can find, not just for how it sounds, but also as a symbol of his way of life." I dont think so. I believe that Bix had such a passion for music, at first about jazz, that he embraced it for how it would fit his sensibility, not as a "symbol of his way of life." I dont think that Bix wanted to give a message about a way of life when he devoted his life to music; it was the manifestation of his great passion, obsession if you like, for creating music.

 

Ted seems to paint Bix as a rebel, an outsider. I disagree. Bix was not rebelling against the bourgeois society of his parents, did not go outside their mores for sake of becoming an outsider; Bix was merely following his own inner, powerful  driving forces towards creating music.

 

"Cool" as a personality trait finds its origins in the cool jazz movement, and as such it has a fairly well understood meaning, restrained, detached, cerebral. Today, I believe that cool guys are viewed as charismatic individuals, admired by many, not because of particular achievements in music (or other forms of art, or science), but because of their persona, individuals who seek female partners and are highly successful at seducing them, they display a certain amount of disdain and a great amount of self-confidence.

 

In my previous post I used this view of "cool" and concluded that Bix certainly was not cool. I supplement my previous discussion with the present posting where I discuss Bix in the light of Teds concept of "cool." I still thing that Bix was not a cool guy. He was a passionate guy, consumed by his obsession with music. I cant remember who it was that said that Bix didnt want us (musicians) to have any fun, all he wanted to do was try new things. As I wrote in my brief biography of Bix in the main Bixography website, By all accounts, Bix was a kind, gentle, and generous man. He was an individual of few words, introspective, and unconcerned by the superficial details and demands of daily routine. Music was the all-consuming focus of his life, the essence of his being; and in music, he wrought his everlasting legacy.

 

Albert



Posted on Dec 20, 2009, 11:51 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix: Rebel with a Cause

by

I'm glad to know you've read the chapter, Albert. And I agree that "cool" is frustratingly difficult to define, no less for Ted Gioia than for anyone else. But I guess if we're going to talk about Gioia's argument about Bix being cool in the way that white jazzmen were cool -- Gioia sees Bix as the classic example -- then to turn to another part of his book to find another definition of cool and then argue that this definition doesn't apply to Bix ... well, I would say that doesn't make much sense.

Cool didn't just pop out of Zeus's head one day, fully formed and ready to take over American culture. It came from somewhere. Gioia argues that it came from Bix, among others. But that is not the same as arguing that Bix exhibited all the traits and behaviors that we now associate with cool (a focus on trends and fashions are two that you mentioned). It is to say that white jazzmen, and Bix in particular, exhibited the traits and behaviors that Gioia lists and describes (and that I summarized), and these developed into the cool aesthetic as we know it today. That being said, I would encourage you to respond to the particulars of what Gioia actually argues in the chapter about Bix. I'm curious to know what you think.

You do take issue with Gioia's claim that Bix "embraces the most raucous and uninhibited music he can find, not just for how it sounds, but also as a symbol of his way of life." Like you, I question this statement, although unlike you, I tend to question our ability to know for sure one way or the other. Regardless, I think this is an example of what I think is a problem with Gioia's argument about Bix -- he confuses the historical and the legendary Bix. Or maybe it's better to say that at times he conflates them. The legendary Bix is the progenitor of cool. No doubt. All those anecdotes from Eddie Condon and Mezz Mezzrow and Wingy Manone and Ralph Berton and Hoagy Carmichael -- who knows whether any of them were true. Regardless, they paint Bix as something of a cool cat and one, Gioia points out, who would not have been nearly as out of place in the sixties as he was in the twenties.

You also write that Gioia "seems to paint Bix as a rebel, an outsider. I disagree. Bix was not rebelling against the bourgeois society of his parents, did not go outside their mores for sake of becoming an outsider; Bix was merely following his own inner, powerful driving forces towards creating music."

Your focus here is on Bix's motivations for going outside the mores of his parents, which suggests that you acknowledge that he did, in fact, go outside those mores. He did this by not focusing on school, by not finding a more conservative profession, by not staying in Davenport. He did this by being arrested for a "Lewd & lascivious act" (it hardly matters whether he was guilty; that such an arrest ever happened was a kind of transgression). And he certainly did this by drinking and then drinking some more until he collapsed and died. Presumably this was not how he was raised! Of course, you might be right that he was driven by "his own inner, powerful driving forces." I'll bet he was. But this makes him no less a rebel, no less an outsider. For my money, it makes him more of one.

Anyway, I'd be curious to hear you expand on this idea that Bix was not an outsider.



Posted on Dec 20, 2009, 12:35 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Bix: Rebel with a Cause

by

It makes sense to me. If one is going to write a treatise on cool, then it is not appropriate, in my opinion, to have a definition of a "cool" personality in one section of the book, and another one in another section. Of course, not all traits characteristic of the cool guy would apply to all individuals, but the key ones should. Ted writes, "Cool was defined by its reliance on image and irony, by its artifice and playful fluidity. It was marked, above all, by an outward focus on trends and fashions." These, which I take to be very important in Teds view of the cool, ought to be found in Bix. They are not.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

 

There is a huge difference between being a rebel, an outsider for the sake of being an outsider, and Bixs lifestyle. In my book, for Bix to be a rebel, he would have had to have an agenda to abandon societys and his familys beliefs and principles. Bix as an outsider would have made a conscious decision to lead his life outside that of his family because he objected to his familys lifestyle. NO! I dont think there was such an agenda, such a conscious decision. As a I said repeatedly, Bix had a passion (and a genius) for music and the path (lifestyle) he chose had nothing to do with rebellion or deliberately choosing to be an outsider, but the natural flow of events for a person who decided to become a jazz/dance band musician.

 

Albert



Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 5:37 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Outsiders

by

Albert, I'll admit to being frustrated by your refusal to look at Gioia's specific argument in his chapter about Bix. Said argument about cool is restricted to the characteristics of white jazzmen, characteristics that -- and here I just want to emphasize -- preceded our current definition of cool. Gioia argues that cool as we know it now did not exist then, and therefore we cannot impose on white jazzmen and Bix in particular the definition of cool that has since developed, one that relies, as you point out, "on image and irony," on "artifice and playful fluidity."

In the meantime, I asked you to help me understand how Bix wasn't an outsider, and instead you gave me an explanation of why Bix wasn't a rebel. I would argue that someone who moved away from home, joined a dance band orchestra, and then drank himself to death didn't do that without thinking about it; that would make him "passive," a personality trait you don't subscribe to where Bix is concerned. So perhaps he was a rebel, but I'm not going to plant my flag on that hill. It's the sort of thing we can debate and have opinions about, but not the sort of thing we can really know.

But I would argue that Bix's status as outsider is a bit more objective. Do you still think he wasn't an outsider? If so, why?

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 6:02 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Now I'm hooked

by

The Gioia book would not have made it to my radar without this discussion, but I've followed every comment and read every review suggested and now I guess I'll have to read the source document, mostly because something about his whole argument, as laid out so far, just strikes me as wrong. I've ordered it from my local library so I can figure out what. Thanks for all the commentary. When I finally get the book, I might weigh in, if anyone is still discussing this, that is! Anyway, thanks! BTW for those of you that got it, enjoy the snow!

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 7:05 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I am not enjoying the snow. Here we got about two feet ....

by

.... and shoveling all that amount is no fun, in particular the heavy stuff that town snowplows dump in front of your driveway when they clean the streets! When I lived in State Colleg, PA, the snow was removed in dump trucks, not just pushed around. So far I have done half. I am not looking forward to the next half.

But I look forward to your views about the subject of Bix as a "cool guy."

Albert



Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 7:16 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You complain that I did not respond to your request ….

by

. for an explanation of why Bix was not an outsider and instead I explained why Bix was not a rebel.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

You missed two things. First, the title of your post was Bix as a rebel. Second, in my explanation of why Bix was not a rebel, I also provided the reasons why I think Bix was not an outsider. I guess, I will have to repeat and expand. Perhaps, this time it will be understood.

 

Bix an outsider? Incidentally, I recommend the book The Outsider by Colin Wilson which I read in the 1950s. Briefly, I view an outsider as an individual who is at odds with society, in particular with the environment where he grew up. The young people who lived in communes in the 1960s and 1970s were outsiders. They chose to drop the lifestyle of their parents. In my view, these were outsiders by design, they objected to the society where they grew up, they chose an utterly different lifestyle than that of their parents. Bix lived in the environment of jazz and dance band musicians. Certainly, that environment was outside of the mainstream community of his youth and family. But he did not object to the lifestyle of his parents. In order to pursue the passion of his life, he had to move outside the community of his parents. Not because he disliked and objected to his parents lifestyle, but because the jazz musicians community was the place where he could develop and fulfill his life ambition. He did not go outside the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Midwest lifestyle because he objected or disapprove of that life style, but because the only way he could fulfill his ambition was by going outside. He did not do this mindlessly, as you suggest I said. It was a deliberate decision on Bixs part, but not one because he disliked or despised his parents environment, but because it was the only way to proceed if he was to become a professional musician.

 

Bix as cool guy? Ted clearly states that the concept of cool developed in the 1950s world of jazz. It then spread to the world of "movies, literature, and other cultural spheres." What started as a designation of a style of jazz became generalized as a designation of a personality, an attitude, an approach to life. Now, Ted looks for roots of cool jazz in the 1920s. He thinks he finds them in Bix. Now, Bix becomes  the progenitor of cool jazz. But  Ted goes further. He decides to define a cool guy in the 1920s and 30s. The definition from the cool jazz days is not applicable. So he invents a cool guy in the 1920s and 1930s. Ted assigns to the cool guy several characteristics, which happen to coincide with Bix's lifestyle. So Ted  declares that Bix is the progenitor of both cool jazz and the cool guy. [Seems like playing with loaded dice to me.] But the characteristics of Bix as a persona are radically different from those of the cool guy as viewed in the 1950s and beyond. So why should these be used to define a cool guy in the 1920s but not in the 1950s? There's something circular here. Anyway, you listed the following:

-         "the outsider among the outsiders, a self-imposed alienation." I covered this above. In the case of Bix, I explained that it was not an alienation self-imposed by his desire to distance himself from his parents lifestyle,  but one  imposed by the fact that he wanted to fulfill his musical aspirations.

-         "he sees himself as misunderstood, an underdog." Misunderstood by whom? His fellow musicians, his parents, society at large? I dont think so. Certainly not by his fellow musicians or his mother. Many musicians had nothing but praise and admiration for Bixs musical genius. His mother? She certainly understood what Bixs role was in the Paul Whiteman orchestra. Society? Maybe, but I dont know if Bix cared for the "understanding" of society.

-         "his art dictates his response to the world (e.g., he is spontaneous and flouts rules)."Bix showed contempt for rules? Prohibition? Millions did too. Were they all cool? Spontaneous? Most people are spontaneous, only a few put on an act on their everyday behavior.

-         "he values experience the way a banker hoards capital" ???? Does not compute for me.

 

Bix cool (either in music or as a guy)? My response, a resounding "no!" And in my opinion, too much psychological claptrap for Bix whose life revolved around music and little else, and whose motivations were dictated mostly by his desire to create music..

 

Albert



Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 10:01 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Well, the way I play, I try not to be a repeater pencil, ya dig?

by

Albert, your herculean efforts at helping me understand your position are very much appreciated. Especially when you are laboring under two feet of snow! I'm not sure why it matters that Bix "did not object to the lifestyle of his parents." I don't object to the lifestyle of my parents, either, except that I insist on living differently. That puts me outside of their world. No motivations or value judgments need attend that observation.

I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on that point. But I do want to address, in detail, your argument about "Bix as cool guy."

Bix as cool guy? Ted clearly states that the concept of cool developed in the 1950s world of jazz. It then spread to the world of "movies, literature, and other cultural spheres."

In fact, Gioia writes this: "The cool's first stirrings came from the world of jazz, but soon its influence could be seen in movies, literature, and other cultural spheres" (p. 2). He did not write that it was developed in the fifties. This is an important distinction, I think.

What started as a designation of a style of jazz became generalized as a designation of a personality, an attitude, an approach to life.

It's not clear to me whether Gioia ever argues which came first: the music or the lifestyle. He does, however, write this: "What started as a lifestyle limited to a few jazz 'out-cats' -- Bix Beiderbecke, Lester Young, Miles Davis -- became a mass movement by the time we got to the 1970s and 1980s" (p. 2).

Now, Ted looks for roots of cool jazz in the 1920s. He thinks he finds them in Bix. Now, Bix becomes the progenitor of cool jazz.

Gioia writes that he (Gioia) is hardly alone in looking for the roots of cool jazz in the twenties and in Bix: "The term cool jazz would not become widely used in the jazz world until the fifties, but when later commentators tried to write its early history, they inevitably traced this music back to the most celebrated white jazz player of the twenties, cornetist Bix Beiderbecke who, more than anyone, deserves the title of founding father of cool jazz" (p. 60). It's an important point, I believe, because you accuse Gioia of "loading the dice," when I'm not convinced that he has done that. Either way, I think you would agree that it's important to fairly and accurately restate his argument, especially when you disagree with it. By the way, I haven't done the research, so I don't know whether "later commentators ... inevitably traced" cool jazz back to Bix. Do you?

But Ted goes further. He decides to define a cool guy in the 1920s and 30s. The definition from the cool jazz days is not applicable. So he invents a cool guy in the 1920s and 1930s.

I think you're turning Gioia's argument on its head. It's not that the definition of "cool" in the fifties is not applicable; it's that the idea of cool had grown, let's say, from a seed into a tree. The two things share some properties but are certainly not exactly the same thing. That's why I object to you dismissing Bix as not cool by a definition that Gioia doesn't use. Anyway, Gioia doesn't "invent" cool guys. Instead, he observes that the seeds of coolness could be found in the white jazzmen of the nineteen-twenties. (In other words, he identifies guys who already exist and asserts that they are the progenitors of cool.) Perhaps you disagree with some or all of this: a) Gioia's definition of modern cool; b) Gioia's definition of what cool had become by the fifties; c) Gioia's assertion that cool can be traced back to the white jazzmen of the twenties; d) Gioia's list of characteristics that describe those jazzmen. But your response to Gioia doesn't much engage these premises.

Ted assigns to the cool guy several characteristics, which happen to coincide with Bix's lifestyle. So Ted declares that Bix is the progenitor of both cool jazz and the cool guy. [Seems like playing with loaded dice to me.]

If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting that Gioia began his argument knowing that he wanted Bix to be the progenitor of cool, and then arranged the evidence to prove that. I think a more fair treatment of the argument would be to assume good faith and test the premises, as I've suggested above. If I'm being unfair to you, I apologize. But where is the evidence that Gioia has cooked the books here? It's true that Gioia connects the cool aesthetic and cool jazz through Bix, but he doesn't write that the connection is necessary. Plenty of white jazzmen in the twenties fit Gioia's definition of proto-cool but did not play in the Beiderbecke style. In fact, on page 77, Gioia calls the conjunction of cool persona and cool music (in Bix and in Lester Young) "rare."

But the characteristics of Bix as a persona are radically different from those of the cool guy as viewed in the 1950s and beyond. So why should these be used to define a cool guy in the 1920s but not in the 1950s? There's something circular here.

The characteristics of the twenties and fifties cool personas are different, yes. Radically different? I'm not convinced. By the nineteen-fifties, the cool aesthetic still embraced being an outsider, defining yourself as an underdog, and celebrating spontaneity and rule-breaking. Think Elvis. Think James Dean. These guys were cool, and they fit that blueprint to a T. What changes by the fifties? In his chapter on Lester Young, Gioia points out the man's famously affected speech and his hipster clothes. Prez created a cool pose that could be easily imitated and was. Elsewhere, Gioia writes that one of the characteristics and, indeed, attractions of cool is that it was a game that everybody could play (p. 2). "In short," Gioia writes, "Lester Young did not need to have a saxophone in his hand in order to influence the broader American culture. By sheer force of personality and creative license in leading his day-to-day life, Prez set an example that millions would later follow" (p. 77). This was not true about Bix, unless you also wanted to drink yourself to death -- although, as I argued earlier, it was true to some extent about his legend. Bix's life was not a pose that others could follow. (For that, I might point you instead to Mezz Mezzrow. Socially, he was the proto-Prez.) By the time of Miles Davis, this cool pose had reached its apex in his refusal to emulate Louis Armstrong's showmanship, in his seeming contempt for his audience and for the commercial success they brought him. "His tough-guy attitude was ... another filter through which audiences struggled to find the 'real' Miles Davis" (p. 81).

So. To say that Bix was not much like Miles, for instance, or that he was not much like cool as it was defined in the fifties and beyond, is not to credibly attack Gioia's argument.

I appreciate that your opinion as to whether Bix was the progenitor of cool is "a resounding 'no'!" I am less inclined to resound on the subject as I am to try to understand where Gioia is coming from. And from what I've read so far, you haven't done much to dent his argument. Like you say, though, perhaps I just don't understand what you're saying. Thanks for your persistence anyway.

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 12:17 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You claim that ….

by

.... I "haven't done much to dent his [Ted Gioia] argument."

 

 Let' get back to basics. You provided the following list of characteristics of a cool guy and requested (more than once) that I respond. [Here, I expanded on these characteristics by quoting from Ted's chapter on Bix.]

  • Outsider among outsiders (takes satisfaction in its far remove from social norms and expectations)
  • Misunderstood (he roots for the underdog and misunderstood, and often sees himself in these terms)
  • Flouts rules (the rules apply to others, not to him)
  • Values experience the way a banker hoards capital (???)

Except for the last item in the list which I do not understand (maybe you can explain it to me), I responded to all of the above and concluded that, if the list defines a cool guy, Bix was not cool. You have not commented on my specific responses to the items in the list (except the general question of what is an outsider) , but claim that Teds argument stands. This means that Bix, in your view, meets the characteristics listed above. Could you provide evidence that Bix indeed meets these criteria?

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 22, 2009 8:30 AM
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 22, 2009 6:14 AM

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 5:53 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


It's cool, man

by

Thanks for your response, Albert. I do claim that you haven't done much to dent Ted Gioia's argument. I claim that because, with all due respect, you haven't once summarized it in a way that suggests you care to understand what it is he's arguing. Still, you're absolutely right that I didn't respond to your point-by-point rebuttals of Gioia's list of the characteristics of nineteen-twenties jazzmen. I'm happy to do so here, with apologies for length. I'm sure that many, like Brad Kay, don't care a flying fig about whether Bix is, as you like to put, a "cool guy." That's cool, but I do care. Not because it matters where Bix's music is concerned, but because Bix is more than his music. That's a hill I am willing to plant my flag on!

So:

"the outsider among the outsiders, a self-imposed alienation." I covered this above. In the case of Bix, I explained that it was not an alienation self-imposed by his desire to distance himself from his parents' lifestyle, but one imposed by the fact that he wanted to fulfill his musical aspirations.

Here's what Gioia writes: "A youngster finds himself at odds with the values of his bourgeois family, his rebellion facilitated by their doting indulgence. He has run-ins with school authorities and sometimes with the law. Parents and grown-ups want him to pursue a stable career, but he prefers to find himself, to follow his own muse. He experiments with illegal substances, which eventually prove more harmful than he realizes. He shocks the older generation with his transgression of community mores. He embraces the most raucous and uninhibited music he can find ..." (p. 61)

You may think, like me, that Gioia paints with a broad brush here, but I hardly think it's a stretch to describe Bix as an outsider. Gioia suggests that white jazzmen were double outsiders, in that they didn't fit in with their families, while they also were white men playing music associated with black people. In 1919, which was, I believe, the year Bix bought his first horn, Alfred Hertz, the conductor of the San Francisco Symphony and Paul Whiteman's former boss, told a newspaper this about jazz: "A people can no more indulge in jazz without becoming demoralized than they can touch a black crock without being smutted. On the other hand, good music uplifts morally and spiritually" (Rayno, p. 29). The implied racism of that quotation always gets me, and this was respectable opinion back then! So here comes Little Bickie, deciding to take up exactly this music that a respectable classical conductor born in Germany, no less, and featured on the cover of Time magazine in 1927 -- finds to be the opposite of morally and spiritually uplifting. Yes, perhaps Mom and Pop Beiderbecke were relatively tolerant, but for my money that still puts Bix outside the mores of his family and of respectable society.

I get the sense (and please correct me if I'm wrong) that you feel you are in the position of defending Bix from Gioia's claims. I don't think there is any value judgment attached to the idea that Bix was an outsider, and I don't think it's particularly controversial.

Anyway, you further dispute the term "self-imposed." I think that Bix had a choice. He could do what was expected of him, or he could do what he was driven to do. He chose the latter. Not because he hated his parents or what they stood for. As I've mentioned more than once now, I don't think his opinion of his parents is relevant here.

Jean Pierre Lion echoes this line of thinking: "Bix was a rebel. He was clearly aware of what he was turning down -- the family 'model' he had grown with -- but living on the fringe of society was still painful. His choice of jazz, this 'degenerate music born in the brothels of New Orleans,' was a slap in the face for his parents: these bourgeois people, raised on rigid principles of German rectitude, had obviously dreamed of a quite different future for their astonishing child" (p. 29).

"he sees himself as misunderstood, an underdog." Misunderstood by whom? His fellow musicians, his parents, society at large? I don't think so. Certainly not by his fellow musicians or his mother. Many musicians had nothing but praise and admiration for Bix's musical genius. His mother? She certainly understood what Bix's role was in the Paul Whiteman orchestra. Society? Maybe, but I don't know if Bix cared for the "understanding" of society.

It's worth reminding you that the "he" you're quoting here refers to the white jazzman of the nineteen-twenties. Gioia argues that Bix was the example par excellence, but I think it's fair for him to offer some very general observations about a group of people -- how they were portrayed and how they portrayed themselves -- and not expect Bix to fit every last description perfectly.

Anyway, to have "nothing but praise and admiration for Bix's musical genius" is not the same as understanding Bix or his genius. People are complicated, and I would argue that Bix was a person and therefore also complicated. I would further argue that the people around him regularly expressed confusion and befuddlement about Bix. Who is this guy who just sits on the train tracks guzzling bootleg as if there isn't a train bearing down on him? Who is this dude who never seems to have the right clothes, so I loan him some, and he comes back wearing different clothes altogether!? Who is this dude who aspired to be a professional musician, who aspired even to play and compose "respectable" music, yet took so long to learn to read music properly?

"Everybody loved Bix," his friend Russ Morgan famously said. The guy didn't have an enemy in the world. But he was out of this world most of the time" (Shapiro and Hentoff, p. 151). "Bix was as usual gazing off into his private astronomy, blowing something pretty," Ralph Berton writes (p. 254). There are more observations like these; I think Brad Kay alludes to one in his posting below. So I think it's fair to say that to his fellow musicians (perhaps even to his family) Bix was something of a "riddle wrapped in an enigma," as the Bix Beiderbecke Memorial Society website once put it.

It's a bit harder to nail down how Bix saw himself. He didn't have much to say, certainly not compared to musicians like Hoagy Carmichael, Eddie Condon, or Louis Armstrong. I will say that, especially toward the end of his life, Bix was not above feeling sorry for himself and painting himself the victim. "He told me that every time he tried to go off the wagon," Pat Ciricillo said, "friends came up [to his room] and visited him with gin bottles, and that tempted him" (Sudhalter and Evans, p. 310).

"Always the same theme," Sudhalter and Evans write, "that 'Life has passed me by,' and that all the musicians who came around to flatter and pay court had 'stolen my stuff' for commercial gain. 'What about all those guys who aren't ever around when you really need them? They wouldn't give me a quarter now'" (p. 324).

Anyway, it makes sense that Bix might feel misunderstood by society if, as you say, he was driven to do something -- make jazz music -- that was also considered to be the opposite of morally and spiritually uplifting. It hardly matters whether Bix "cared for the 'understanding' of society." Again, I don't think Gioia's point here is particularly controversial.

"his art dictates his response to the world (e.g., he is spontaneous and flouts rules)."Bix showed contempt for rules? Prohibition? Millions did too. Were they all cool? Spontaneous? Most people are spontaneous, only a few put on an act on their everyday behavior.

Sure. Millions of Americans showed contempt for Prohibition. (Bix's hometown of Davenport showed particular contempt, driven by Bix's fellow Germans.) But I think it's more than reasonable to say that Bix was not a rule-follower. Take Lake Forest, for example. Bix's "influence around the school has been felt to be very injurious in that his influence upon other boys has deterred them from work and has upset them in the matter of conduct," reported the headmaster (Lion, p. 42). "At the time he left," this same headmaster later reported to Bix's parents, "we were not absolutely dead sure as to his part with regard to liquor around the School. Since then we have definitely learned that was drinking himself and was responsible, in part at least, in having liquor brought into the School ... The more we have found out concerning him since he left, the more we regret the thing he did and are sorry that he was in the School at all. Bix is a very clever excuse-maker, and I think he sometimes fools even himself in a way" (Lion, pp. 43-44).

Ouch. Bix was nineteen years old at this point. Maybe his character completely changed in the nine years he had left, but I doubt it.

Of course, he was no more of a rule-follower in music, right? This is why we like him. He created something new, and to do that, you can't follow the rules. "One of the things I like about jazz, kid," Bix famously told Jimmy McPartland (a quip that Laura recently reminded us of), "is I don't know what's going to happen next. Do you?" (Shapiro and Hentoff, p. 158). This is the very essence of spontaneity.

Remember that your quotations ("his art dictates his response to the world," et al.) are in reference generally to white jazzmen of the nineteen-twenties. Bix was hardly the only spontaneous one in his crowd. It's one of the things he likes about jazz, not about himself or his own life in particular. Still, I'm not sure why you feel the need to argue -- not argue, just assert -- that "most people are spontaneous." I suspect the world would be a bit more chaotic than it already is if that were truly the case. Either way, I get the sense that if Gioia says it, you disagree on principle. Am I wrong to think that you see Bix as misunderstood here, as a victim you need to defend? Whatever the case, I think it's too bad. I don't think Gioia is really going out on a limb here.

"he values experience the way a banker hoards capital" ???? Does not compute for me.

I get the sense, Albert -- and here I fully admit that I am aiming my dusted-off and warmed-up claptrap machine directly at you -- that you are not the type who "values experience the way a banker hoards capital." Nevertheless, here's what I think Gioia means by this. (I say "I think" because I'll grant you it's a bit vague.) We all value many things, but some things more than others, and we live our lives accordingly. I would guess that you value logic, rationality, facts, documented evidence, getting things right -- and you have lived your life, and conducted the affairs of the Bixography forum, accordingly. Nothing wrong with that. Others most value getting ahead financially or fitting in socially, and they drive to the office in their BMWs and trade in stocks and are happier for it. Nothing wrong with that. Of course, if I shared the same values, I wouldn't have been an English major and I wouldn't have become a writer and an editor.

Which reminds me, I was in France earlier in the year to write, and there I met a couple from New Zealand, wonderful artists both of them and in their mid-twenties. They had been living on the road for a long while, maybe for years. They'd been around the world, and had wonderful stories to tell about elephants in Bangkok and crappy weather in London and orphanages in Vietnam and the surf in Portugal. Their idea of a good time was to hike in a direction they'd never been before, and, if possible, to jump off the trail. They showed me once where they had tramped down off the mountainside we were on and gotten stuck among the boulders and trees while trying to cross the valley. I thought, "These people are crazy!" But they were just in it for the experience. They were always looking for something new, thrilled to improvise their way through the world. It would be an understatement to say that this is not how I live. I am something of a hermit, I think. I plan ahead; I get lost easily. Still, it does compute for me; I understand what it means to value that experience, and I respect it.

I suspect that you are not going to identify much ground where we agree, Albert, but I hope that I've provided a thorough response to your points, at least.

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 8:50 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


One out of four.

by

I regret that you decided to respond specifically to the items in question by neglecting the material in parenthesis in my previous post, the one you answered to. I had added these because they define better what Gioia meant

 

Outsider among outsiders (takes satisfaction in its far remove from social norms and expectations)

 

The parenthetical material is crucial. It supports my point that the choice Bix made of devoting his life to music was not a rebellion against his parents world, that he was not going outside just for the sake of being an outsider. One who takes satisfaction to be outside does it intentionally to show his contempt for social norms. Bix did not go into the outside world of jazz musicians to satisfy himself and to remove himself from social norms. He went there because it was the natural and probably only way to fulfill his aspirations as a creator of music.

 

Misunderstood (he roots for the underdog and misunderstood, and often sees himself in these terms)

 

In fact, some of the examples you gave show that, at least, some of Bixs fellow musicians understood him. "Everybody loved Bix," his friend Russ Morgan famously said. The guy didn't have an enemy in the world. But he was out of this world most of the time" (Shapiro and Hentoff, p. 151). The extraterrestrial, according to Benny Goodman. These guys understood Bix. Indeed, Bix was not your garden variety musician, blowing music during hours and then looking for fun and girls. He was unusual, different. Bix was serious about music, as Louis Armstrong told us. Louis was another musician who understood Bix. Yes, Bix was different and that was captured by Benny and by Russ Morgan. Another musician, I cant remember who, said that Bix did not want us (musicians) to have fun. He was always thinking of music. Several of his fellow musicians indeed understood that Bix was different, always involved with his internal world of music. The quotes you provided from Sudhalter and Evans come from Bix almost at the end of his life, when he was sick, his body and mind ravaged by the excesses of prohibition booze with its high content of toxic substances. That was not the normal state of mind that Bix had when he was healthy.

 

Flouts rules (the rules apply to others, not to him)

 

I will agree with this. You give good examples aside from prohibition (which, in fact, was disregarded by millions of Americans). Night escapades from Lake Forest, playing cornet in an unorthodox manner, etc

 

Values experience the way a banker hoards capital

 

I think I understand now. But you did not give any evidence that Bix valued experience, or did I miss it? I imagine that experience means trying a variety of things. I don't believe that Bix was trying a variety of things. His life revolved around his music and his alcohol addiction. What else? I dont know of any.

 

The bottom line, one out of four does not make Bix a cool guy, even using the rather narrow parameters described by Gioia.

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 22, 2009 11:52 AM

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 11:50 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You're a mystery to me. Precisely!

by

I imagine T-shirts at the next Bix Fest: "One outta four doesn't make Bix a cool guy"! We can wear them and all rest more easily knowing that Ted Gioia's outrageous suggestion that Bix was an outsider has been thoroughly debunked.

In the meantime, let me review a couple points that I think are important: 1) Gioia does not argue that these guys are "cool" in the modern sense. They are proto-cool: my word but, I think, Gioia's meaning; 2) when Gioia describes the proto-cool white jazzman of the nineteen-twenties as someone who "takes satisfaction in [his] far remove from social norms and expectations," he (Gioia) is not, at that moment, on page 60, describing Bix Beiderbecke. Why does that matter? Because you continue to argue, in great detail, as if he were. As I wrote earlier, Gioia argues that Bix is the example par excellence of this personality type, but in an argument such as his, I don't think that means he should be held to the standard you are holding him to: that everything Gioia uses to describe the white jazzmen, in each detail, must perfectly transfer to Bix.

And I'm not sure that this one does. When Gioia writes that Bix "embraces the most raucous and uninhibited music he can find," I think that he (Gioia) is right; when he continues that Bix does this "not just for how it sounds, but also as a symbol of his way of life," I wonder, perhaps like you, how he knows this.

Regardless, I have argued that Bix was an outsider, his motivations notwithstanding. This point seems to me as clear as a mallet striking a chime! You argue that his motivations are all that matter. I don't think any of us is really privy to his motivations, but like you, I think it's probably most likely that what sent Bix "outside" was his drive to play music. My guess is that Gioia wouldn't disagree; after all, his book ascribes to the proto-cool guy a dedication to his art.

But maybe we're just talking past each other here and can agree to move on.

I must admit, though, Albert, at being both amazed and impressed by your argument that Bix was not at all misunderstood. First, though, I'll cop to a flaw in my argument: I paid more attention to how others saw Bix and less attention to how Bix saw himself. I did this because, as I wrote, Bix didn't leave much of a record regarding how he saw himself or what he thought. His letters home, for reasons I've already mentioned, are an imperfect avenue into the head of this young man. The one extant interview he gave -- well, that doesn't sound like Bix at all! So most arguments that hinge on knowing (for sure) what (the historical, as opposed to the legendary) Bix thought I want no part of. And when Gioia describes the proto-cool white jazzmen of the nineteen-twenties, he presumes to know what they thought, probably because a lot of them (Condon, Mezzrow, Manone, Carmichael, et al.) wrote at length about what they thought. But when Gioia describes Bix Beiderbecke in particular, he does not describe Bix as rooting for the underdog or seeing himself as misunderstood. I've read the pages so many times my eyes are glazing over, so if I missed it, please point out the passage. (Anyway, at the risk of belaboring the point, I don't think Gioia needs to describe Bix this way, either. Bix does not have to share, in detail, every last characteristic of his group.)

Getting back on track -- I mentioned how amazed and impressed I am by your argument. In responding to my claim that Bix was not always well understood by his mates, and that this can be seen in the fact that they suggest, over and over again, that he seems to dwell on a different planet from them, that he is some kind of alien, that he is off somewhere in space and they have no idea where -- to this you respond that such comments are evidence that, in fact, they understood Bix perfectly!

Dude, I don't get you. You're a mystery to me.

Precisely! I'm a mystery. You get me perfectly.

I can't argue with that. And I can argue with anything!

You then write that those quotations that suggested Bix felt sorry for himself at the end of his life, making excuses for why he couldn't quit drinking (i.e., his friends tempted him) or why he wasn't more famous (i.e., people were always stealing his stuff), "come from Bix almost at the end of his life, when he was sick ... This was not the normal state of mind that Bix had when he was healthy." You might be right, but I remind you of the Lake Forest headmaster: "Bix is a very clever excuse-maker, and I think he sometimes fools even himself in a way." I don't know which is true: when we are sick and not in our right minds we become different people or we become exaggerated, sometimes even malicious, versions of who we normally are. Perhaps they are both true depending upon the person. I don't know, and frankly, I don't think you do, either.

No, I did not give you any direct evidence that Bix valued experience, but I think you did miss what I had hoped you would catch.

I thought, "These people are crazy!" But they were just in it for the experience. They were always looking for something new, thrilled to improvise their way through the world.

Perhaps you don't see Bix in this description. I do.

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 2:04 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


M & M: Mystery and Misunderstanding

by

It is regrettable that you equate the statements you quoted about Bix from fellow musicians with Bix being a mystery. You dont seem to appreciate the conceptual difference between mystery and misunderstanding or between "misunderstanding" and "not understanding." You write, "In responding to my claim that Bix was not always well understood by his mates ..." That's not what Gioia wrote, he used the word "misunderstanding." Not understanding (or not well understood, as you put it) is absence of comprehension. Misunderstanding is misconception, misinterpretation, having the wrong idea.

 

Here are the exact quotes that you mentioned, plus a couple of additional ones.

 

-         Russ Morgan, "But he was out of this world most of the time." No mention of a mystery or of misunderstanding. Just that Bix lived in his in his own world. Indeed, Bix lived for his music: that was almost his entire world.

-         Benny Goodman, "Where, what planet, did this guy come from? Is he from outer space? I'd never heard anything like the way he played; not in Chicago, no place. The tone -- he had this wonderful, ringing cornet tone. He could have played in a symphony orchestra with that tone. But also the intervals he played, the figures -- whatever the hell he did." Nothing to do with mystery or misunderstanding. A statement by Benny being amazed by the way Bix played; Benny had not heard anything like it anywhere.

-         Wingy Manone in 1964, "Trumpet on the Wing." "He [Bix] was always talking music, telling us, 'Let's play this chord,' or 'let's figure out some three way harmony for the trumpets after the job tonight.' It seemed to us he didnt want us to enjoy our life." Nothing to do with mystery or misunderstanding. Wingy complains that all Bix wants to do is play music.

-         Louis Armstrong. "Bix was the only musician I ever met who was as serious about music as I am." No question of mystery, just the widely mentioned aspect of Bix's life, his passion for music.

 

To be fair, I should also quote Jimmy McPartland who does mention the word mystery.

In "Lost Chords," Conversations Between Jimmy McPartland and Richard Sudhalter, 1981 to 1985, "Bix was a mystery to us," cornetist Jimmy McPartland once confessed. "We all knew him, admired him, thought he was a great guy. But in a way we didn't know him at all. He wasn't really like us." A mention of mystery, but also that Bix "wasn't really like us." Of course, Bix was a genius, Jimmy and the rest of the musicians in Bixs inner circle were not.

 

Even if we go with the "mystery"bit, I dont know why you are so amazed. When Jimmy says that Bix was a mystery, he is basically acknowledging that he cannot understand what Bix is all about, that Jimmy is unable to comprehend Bix. As I indicated above, this is different from misunderstanding. Misunderstanding is failure to interpret correctly. Stating that Bix was a mystery, reveals not knowing.  Stating that Bix was misunderstood represents a misconception, a mistaken view.

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 23, 2009 5:32 AM

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 5:31 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


This Is Where I Get Off the Bus

by

Thanks for the conversation, Albert. I do appreciate your willingness to engage me on the subject of Gioia's book. I think you make a good point (re mystery & misunderstanding), but I don't think it matters much when it comes to Gioia's larger argument about Bix and the cool. We can continue to parse his (and each other's) words, but I'm not sure it does any good at this point. However, I hope our conversation interested a few more people in his book. It's an interesting read ("lapidary," according to the Post), even if you don't agree with every last word.

Happy Holidays!

Posted on Dec 23, 2009, 5:41 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix as Cool

by

I can't wait to get this book, and, as Alberta said, weigh in properly to this discussion.

However, my take is this: Bix did not openly rebel and defy his parents by deliberately being a bad boy, or saying they were square, nor looked to virulently usurp authority by being as caustic and anti-establishment as possible, defying the law and so forth (yeah yeah, that arrest crap is going to rear itself again but I really don't think this was his way of getting back at the folks -- we can argue ourselves blue in the faces amongst one another whether it was a stupid prank or a momentary aberration or that vengeful neighbor feuding, but it wasn't Bix trying to be cool; he surely must have wanted himself out of that mess as much as his family did.)

HOWEVER, we all have different interpretations of what is "cool." Cool can be, as it was with my generation, and I am talking about the end of the baby boom era where cool simply meant CONFORMITY with the In Crowd and the trendy, faddish, cultish fashiionable things they were doing -- smoking pot, wearing expensive designer clothes, sexually experienced and sophisticated by their mid-teens,affecting a bored, jaded demeanor (I LOVE the term "ennui", it so perfectly sums up the disdainful snots and their exclusive cliques in my high school at the later end of the 1970's) hanging out at all the right "in" gathering places and listening to the same sort of music and being entertained -- if one could call it that -- by the same types of amusement -- if that's cool, Bix wasn't cool.

But there's another kind of cool -- pursuing one's art no matter what, even if it means staying up all night, often forgetting to eat, sleep, or take a shower; being so preoccupied with one's creativity and so innovative in one's productivity and fresh ideas, and socially, such a mesmerizing influence on one's friends -- THAT can be VERY cool. Bix's friends to a person all collectively were awed by him, admired him, discussed him a great deal alive or dead; the real and the fabricated anecdotes added to the growing legend. Cool is someone who just Is. They do what they do artistically because they have to; it's in them and they need to express themelves. And no matter how wrapped up and forgetful and sloppy Bix got personally while dedicating himself to pursuing his music, he was beloved as a kindly and pleasant person. They liked to follow his ideas; they liked to take advice from him, his friends and colleagues. I think that's very cool; his very amiability and genuine popularity made him so. There wasn't a shred of self-conscious affection in Bix. He wasn't adopting any personas to impress anyone; it was modesty all the way. Bix Was, no matter what existed to potentially thwart him -- eventual poor health, incipient and then burgeoning alcoholism,the Crash and Depression, and no matter how he struggled to "go along with it" and how earnest his professional intentions were when he made The Big Time, in his nature the commericalism of mass-marketed popular music just wasn't his bag, with all the hectic touring, endless concerts, grinding recording sessions. He was happiest and best jamming, and sitting in, and sticking around one general area playing in small bands taking his music where it was guiding him in his heart. The quiet person who hunched over the piano composing modernist classical music; the preoccupied fellow spinning out gorgeous notes in his own distinct style from his cornet and improvising as he went -- that was what was cool.

And like any young man who was up on things and paid attention to what was going on around him culturally, Bix -- naturally -- with his friends good-naturedly snickered at the corny bourgeois tastes of middle-middle Americans; not just the graybeards but the "sappy" stuff. They mockingly mimicked other musicians playing in a corny German-band kind of way, and couldn't stand fat-assed whatshisname, the director at the Victor studio who had such moribound non-taste in music and didn't want things too "jazzy"; they always paid attention to the up-and-coming and what was next, and the exicting lure of improvisation, not the dependable thud of the conforming accepted. I always thought guys like Rudy Vallee were as corny as Bix was cool; does anyone out there understand how I mean it? Vallee struck me as so staid and flavorless, and. . .. corny. Bix was cool because -- as he said -- well, kid, that's what I love about jazz, I never know what's going to happen next, do you?

Laura

Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 12:38 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Still haven't read it...

by

but I just want to weigh in on the topic of Bix's "psychology" if that's what the term is for what is being discussed. This is not an answer to anyone in particular. It's just what your discussion reminded me of.

This is what I think was going on with Bix. He was being true to himself in that he was pursuing a career that he seemed born for. That brought him a lot of adulation, mostly from musicians and fans, which no doubt pleased him and encouraged him. His choice of career also probably brought him some disapproval, possibly from older conservative people from home, maybe even from relatives. Since he seems to have been a person who liked getting along with everyone, those who didn't approve of him probably caused him some pain--how much I couldn't say. But maybe enough so that drinking made it better. He was almost definitely a sensitive person (so many people hear emotion and self-revelation in his music that he MUST have been sensitive) so drinking helped dull that too. In addition, since the whole milieu of the jazz life made access to drugs of all kinds easy, he got hooked, as some people do more readily than others. And prohibition booze was poisonous; some couldn't tolerate it. Bix was one of those. Anyone who has ever been addicted to anything, and processed the experience consciously, knows that addicts don't choose it after a while. It chooses them, and not everyone has the will, the optimism, the creativity, and the strength at the moment required to deal with it all. And not everyone can summon those traits as often and relentlessly as is necessary to kick for good. So I don't buy that Bix was necessarily self-destructive any more than many people are in times of extraordinary stress.

As for being an outsider, as I said above, to some he was an outsider, to some he was an insider. What I was trying to say was that maybe his skin wasn't as thick as some since he was sensitive, and so maybe suffered more than most would, among people who considered him an outsider. Was he a rebel? He certainly didn't seem to want to be. His connection with his family seemed crucially important to him, his letters are filled with wishes to please them. As for his seeming willful failure in school, that seems less rebellious to me than just a realization that school had little to offer him. In those days, dropping out of school before graduating was not uncommon, and unless my math is wrong, Bix dropped out of his SOPHOMORE year at AGE 19--it may have been a case of just not feeling part of it all at that point.

One thing I noticed the first time I saw the Mertz film of the band running on Boston Common (in Brigitte Berman's documentary, it was): Bix charges out, clearly fit, ahead of the pack, and turns back to make sure he's not TOO far out there. He does the same thing in a way when walking out of that building at the Bronx Zoo later in the film. He's carrying the cornet case, seems to walk a bit ahead of his companion, and turns back to check out to make sure he's still part of the group. At least that's the way I read it. This silly psychologizing may tell way more about me than it does about Bix, but I'm just putting it out there. It struck me then and it strikes me every time I watch that film. It says to me, "I seem to be different, but I want to be part of you just the same."

One comment of Brendan's I just can't let pass. Brendan, you say, "He did this [i.e., went outside societal mores] by being arrested for a "Lewd & lascivious act" (it hardly matters whether he was guilty; that such an arrest ever happened was a kind of transgression). And he certainly did this by drinking and then drinking some more until he collapsed and died."

I believe what you meant was that by acting in such a way (e.g., skipping school, hanging out in undesirable places, etc.) Bix was in effect leaving himself open to all sorts of mis-interpretations and indeed accusations. In a way, by flouting the usual conventions, he was putting himself at the mercy of people who might mistake youthful freedom for sinister, libertine ways. I don't think you meant that just because he was a truant he was asking to be arrested for child molestation, or that he deserved that somehow. The punishment for the transgression of truancy is not arrest for molestation. It's usually a parental fine or something.

As for the "drinking and then drinking some more", I think I touched on that above. I think the booze chose him after a while. This of course does not absolve him of responsibility. But getting something done about one's addiction can be more like climbing Mt. Everest than a simple "just saying no" after years of abuse.

Well, I haven't talked about Gioia, but will when I finally read it. Best to all. BTW, Albert, snow was meant to be enjoyed!


Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 12:49 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


'The place was disgusting, and he produces God's music.'

by

Hi, Alberta. Thank you again for the book you sent earlier in the year. I've been enjoying it very much. Albert has written today, and of course on more than one occasion prior, of the "psychological claptrap" inflicted on poor Bix. Yet he feels free to write that Bix's "motivations were dictated mostly by his desire to create music." I don't disagree, but when we talk about motivations, aren't we talking about psychology? Maybe it is only "claptrap" if we are speculating about motivations, as opposed to citing letters written home to parents, et cetera. But I have never written a letter home to my parents that was not composed very carefully, with that incredibly important audience in mind. That is not to say that what I wrote was untrue; it is to say that what I wrote was not uncomplicated. That is why I think it's fine to talk about psychology -- even claptrappishly -- but always with the understanding that none of us knows. Not really.

Anyway, I wanted to respond to two things you've written. First, you write that Bix "was almost definitely a sensitive person (so many people hear emotion and self-revelation in his music that he MUST have been sensitive) ..." You traveled the distance from "almost definitely" to an all-capital "MUST" in one sentence, and for all that I have to disagree. I think it's just plain wrong to assume that if you find sensitivity in art, then the artist must be sensitive.

"Talent and character are not connected," Geoff Muldaur told me back in May. "It's a horrible realization for most people. But it's absolutely true. And it baffles people, because how could Ray Charles produce such warm and beautiful things when he wasn't this great guy. Whereas Benny Carter, greatest guy in the world. It's so random -- obsessive-compulsive slob Beethoven. I mean, total slob. Kept his shitter under his writing desk. I mean, the place was disgusting, and he produces God's music."

Muldaur, having known more artists than perhaps the rest of us, is something of an authority. I have certainly seen the case to be true among writers. In fact, I don't much go out of my way to meet the writers I admire most because seldom do they manifest the qualities so evident in their work. It's so disappointing!

I encourage you to read this blog post, by the novelist J. R. Lennon, about his literary heroes, John Cheever and Ray Carver, both of whom are the subject of new biographies.

http://wardsix.blogspot.com/2009/12/self-defeat-self-destruction-and-fame.html

They are, Lennon mourns, "drinking buddies, enablers, philanderers, abusers, liars, fools ... And yet ... these monstrous years created [for Carver, in particular] a tremendous, if small, body of work -- some of the best stories of the past half a century. I find myself in the position of not wanting it to be true ... my heroes are bastards."

As Bixophiles, are we even willing to entertain the possibility that our hero is a bastard? I ask this not in reference to any particular reason why we might think that; rather, there's no point in pulling out your claptrap machine and dusting it off if you're also not willing to acknowledge (and here understand that I don't mean you personally) the full range of possibilities that exist within a human being. For instance, one can not object to the lifestyle of one's parents and still lead a life in opposition to theirs. One could even be kind to one's parents -- especially in letters home -- and still be the sort of person to engage in all manner of nastiness elsewhere. Those letters home might be evidence that Bix was kind and gentle, but they don't even come close, not even remotely close, to sealing the deal. Put another way, psychologizing is worst when it's used to confirm what we already believe, rather than explore the possibilities of what we don't yet understand.

That leads well enough to my second point. You ask whether I meant to imply that Bix's truancy meant "he was asking to be arrested for child molestation." Not at all! I'm sorry if it even seemed as if I were saying that. But I do think you give a very glass-half-full interpretation of the events of April 22, 1921, when you suggest (if I read you correctly) that poor Bix put "himself at the mercy of people who might mistake youthful freedom for sinister, libertine ways." We don't know whether Bix did what he was accused of doing, but to stampede to the conclusion (as so many have, and again, here I'm not referring to you personally) that he didn't do it because he couldn't have done it, because he wasn't the sort to do that kind of thing but rather the sort to treat his parents well and only get drunk some of the time, and even if he was drunk when he might have done what he was accused of doing (and here I'm paraphrasing the view of a Bix expert I've interviewed) then it was just a bit of drunken silliness and no more. Besides, who can trust a five-year-old?

Like I said, we don't know whether he did it. There's evidence he did; there's some circumstantial evidence that he didn't. But if we're to take a discussion of the accusation seriously, then I think we have to begin with the acknowledgment that it was at least possible he was guilty if for no other reason than because we don't know he wasn't.

Anyway, I apologize if I've gone on at too great a length. Albert is under two feet of snow but also living in the land of great diesel-farting snowplows. I'm under three feet of snow in a land completely innocent of the plow. So I have plenty of time on my hands!

Thanks again for the book.


Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 2:42 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Thanks for your response!

by

I will respond via the forum instead of to your email on the chance that others may wish to offer opinions. First, the easy point: of course we can't prove that Bix was innocent of the molestation charge. The awful possibility is out there, with no way of proving anything one way or another, that the worst is true. And I'm glad to hear you confirm you had no intention of implying that his actions as a high-schooler somehow "brought this on".

I also think it's true, even though you don't offer this argument, that what people say about others can be more of a reflection of themselves than an accurate description of their subject. So we have colleague after colleague stating that Bix was nice/gentle/kind or some variation (Challis, Dieterle, McPartland, Carmichael, Rinker). We have the unending loyalty of the Shaffner sisters, despite Ruth having been, in my view, dumped, to put it crudely. There are others with charitable recollections that I recall from the interviews done by the Miami University researcher (name??) They all may just be decent human beings who remember the good in Bix, and in truth he might not have been all that good. So, yes, he might have been a bastard. But why aren't there loads of people attesting to that? I mean, plenty of people trashed Hemingway after he was dead, and I don't recall anyone saying great things about Bird's character, genius though he was and he died almost as young as Bix. My point is, nothing is really provable about a person's character, and most people are mixtures of good and bad traits, with plenty of good and no doubt more than a few embarrassing and downright bad actions under their belts in this life. But why aren't there more people telling us what an SOB Bix was? I think we CAN infer that Bix was not an SOB simply because no one is telling us he was. He was just human, and based on the recollections in print and on tape, nicer or more polite than most. Big deal. Frankly, when you die at 28, you have less time to turn into an SOB.

As for my inferring that Bix was sensitive, you're completely correct, I have no proof. Just because he SEEMS to be showing us his emotions when he plays, he may not be. I agree that I am reading all of this into what I hear. And on the other side, when I hear somebody like Dizzy Gillespie, who to me seems completely intellectual, he may in fact be wearing his heart on his sleeve. However, the fact that Bix was an addict is major evidence that he was sensitive to me. I have no idea if this is a clinical fact. However, I know what I know, and addicts have a lot of exposed nerve endings. You are welcome to disagree.

BTW, I have read a lot of Cheever, never thought he was a nice guy based on the talent. Never heard of Carver. Better check him out. With music it seems less clear-cut because it is not literal. I also never thought Beethoven was a nice guy. Thought he was probably a very powerful individual, though. Now, Tschaikowsky, I thought, might be a nice guy. I'll have to try and find out. Ditto Mendelssohn.









Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 5:21 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You write ....

by

.... "of course we can't prove that Bix was innocent of the molestation charge." 

There is no need to prove that Bix was innocent. Under the US system of justice, an individual is innocent unless proven guilty.

Albert



Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 5:00 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Not Guilty

by

The old saying is "innocent until proven guilty," although even if acquitted of a crime, a defendant is not "innocent," he is "not guilty." Regardless, the point is not whether Bix was guilty or not guilty in the eyes of the law -- certainly he was not guilty. The relevant questions for biographers are these: 1) did he do it? and 2) could he have done it?

Of course, neither question, at least with the information available to us today, is answerable. But that shouldn't deter investigation, because even unanswerable questions can yield insight. And in order to learn anything from such an investigation, in order to be anything other than Bix Beiderbecke's press agents and image consultants, we need to be open to all possible answers.

Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 5:20 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Thank you for making this clear.

by

And for zeroing in on the point: we care not about legal innocence, but about the possibility that our hero might have done this. I for one am grateful that this website has offered a forum for discussion of this, even though many think "enough is enough" on this topic. Because I just learned of this incident less than a year ago, I am really still coming to terms with it all. Where I am now is that while the truth of what happened is unknowable, my instincts tell me what to believe, and so I do, while remaining open to any facts that may eventually emerge.

As for the opinion of many that the music is the only thing that matters, just be aware that that is not true for all of us. Some works of art affect many at a deep emotional level, and we naturally want to know about the person who created them. Didn't Doc Cheatham say something on the Berman film about "everybody wanted to know what a person looked like who could play like that"? Well, it's similar to that feeling.

Happy holidays to all!

Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 7:37 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Davenport Police blotters and one affidavit

by

For this information, I thank Bix biographer J.P.Lions who sent me an e-mail in April this year regarding this very sensitive subject. He has seen all the available documentation that should make clear what happened on 22nd April, 1921. First, would a 5 year old, Sarah Ivens, be capable of making up or concocting such a story if it were not true? Bix's arrest is perfectly documented. Rich Johnson and Phil Evans knew about it for years. There was just a general "consensus" among these old Bixophiles to keep it secret. The incident must have come as a traumatic shock to a well respected, middle class family such as the Beiderbeckes. Bix's father had to post a bail bond of $1500 while a Grand Jury was summoned to decide as to whether the case should be heard in Court. Three documents have actually been archived in Davenport: two police blotters, dated 22nd April, 1921 and one affidavit from the girl's father:
(1) Name, Leon Beiderbecke. Arrested by police officers Len and Halligan. Crime: Lewd and lascivious act with a child etc.
(2) He was accused by Sarah Ivens, 5 years old, 1703 Iowa Street, of putting his hands on her person outside her dress in Goddards's garage, Locust and Grand Avenue, where he took the girl out of the rain. They were in an auto in the garage and he closed the door and she hollered and attracted the attention of James L. Duncan, 1330 East 10th, and Mahlon Barley, 1105 Oneida Avenue, who were working across the street, and they went over and the girl went home.
(3) An affidavit handwritten by Preston I. Ivens living at 3030 Grand Avenue, in which he declared:
"On April 22, 1921, my little girl came home, told me that a man took her in the garage, said some awful things to her. Next day I saw two boys whom I had seen when I went to the garage. I asked them if they saw a man take a little girl into the garage the day before. They said yes, and told me it was the defendant. My little girl told her story to me and later to the Chief of Police and the County Attorney. She said he asked to show herself. The little girl is 5 years old. In consideration of the child's age and the harm that would result to her in going over this case, I would request that no action be taken by the Grand Jury. I consulted with Dr. Eliot, and Dr. B.J.Palmer and Dr. Craven, and they all, besides with Mr. C.H.Murphy, thought it best to drop the case for the betterment of the child".
One thing is for certain: the Beiderbecke family made all they could to keep the thing as unknown as possible. Bix's name was was cited in the local press for "speeding" on June 22, 1920, but in April, 1921, all newspapers kept quiet! The explanation of this silence is to be found in Mr. Ivens' affidavit: he requested "that no action be taken" and he withdrew his claim, which put an end to the case. So it was kept out of the papers to protect the girl, rather than the Beiderbecke family.

Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 11:10 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Calling a lawyer, calling a lawyer.

by

My understanding, but I would defer to a competent attorney, is that a defendant is innocent unless proven guilty; the presumption is not that the accused is not guilty until proven guilty; there is the presumption that the accused is "innocent," not a presumption that he/she is"not guilty". In the Coffin vs United States Case, the Supreme Court stated,

"The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal law."

Unfortunately, when mud is thrown at an individual, it sticks. Many (most?)  people do not believe in the innocence of an individual if he is charged with a crime, even if not convicted. Case in point, Bix's arrest. Bixophiles will give Bix the benefit of the doubt in the sense that they are not certain that he committed the alleged offense. But they are not certain that he did not commit it. To me, the presumption of innocence is not just a legal phrase, but a living principle.To me, an individual who is not proven guilty is innocent, not only in the legal sense, but also in fact.

I don't know how many of you have seen the posting of Sarah Ivens's daughter in

http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/1249675435/  (I edited the message to remove the email address of  Marianne Beveridge; it took me several attempts)

 

You will see that Sarah Ivens was visually impaired. I may write some more about this whole business in the future. But at this point, I will ask the question, "How is it possible for a 5-year old, visually impaired little gilr to be one mile from her home?"

 

Albert



Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 9:32 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Judge Not, but Judge Carefully

by

Albert, I'm happy to defer to a lawyer. My point, though, is merely this: courts do not make metaphysical proclamations concerning people's innocence. There is what can be proved and what can't be proved, and the burden of proof is on the state. That is what is meant by presumption of innocence. But to be accused, charged, and acquitted, or to be accused, charged, and found guilty -- this says nothing about whether you did it; it speaks only to what was proved.

It says volumes about your approach to Bix Beiderbecke's life that you declare as "fact" -- and "not only in a legal sense" -- what you cannot possibly know. It taints every argument you could ever possibly make about the arrest. After all, you've already made up your mind. If I misunderstand you here, please let me know.

Certainly, I understand how accusations can "stick," and as responsible citizens we shouldn't go around assuming facts we don't know to be true. It's always a neighborly policy to give people the benefit of the doubt. But absent actually knowing one way or the other, I think it's also neighborly not to accuse people of throwing mud or to attack their motivations.

This is not to say that you can't look into the facts. By all means! But for someone who accused Ted Gioia of loading the dice, you should think about whether you can approach such an investigation in good faith. You might ask yourself, and then out of courtesy disclose to your readers, what you are: an historian, a biographer, a fan, a PR agent, what? Historians and biographers don't assume they know to be true things they don't, in fact, know to be true.

Anyway, I had not seen the message you linked to. It's remarkable. You respond by asking how it is possible for a five-year-old girl who is visually impaired to be a mile away from home. By home, I assume you mean on Iowa Street. That reminds me of a confusing bit of information in Rich Johnson's book that perhaps you are able to clarify for me. On page 441, he writes that Preston Ivens's "wife and three children -- two boys, ages ten and nine, and a five-year-old daughter -- lived on Iowa Street while Ivens lived on Grand Avenue, several blocks north of the Beiderbeckes."

The two different residences is never explained. I presume that the Grand Avenue home is closer to where the incident is said to have happened, but I don't know that. Do you? Wouldn't it have been possible for her to be at her dads house?


Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 10:24 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A Bix Researcher

by Albert Haim

I view the doctrine of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty" as a fundamental philosophical principle regarding the rights of human beings, not just as a procedure in courts. As far as I am concerned, a person not proven guilty is innocent, period. I know that many (if not most) people will view with suspicion anyone who is charged with a crime. The argument goes something like, "Why would this person be arrested if he/she was innocent? He/she must have done something." Not necessarily. I have read about so many miscarriages of justice that I have no confidence in the infallibility of the justice system, and witnesses are often unreliable. To me, that is exactly the problem that the philosophical principle tries to address, sadly unsuccessfully in practice. I stick to the principle.

 

I certainly can argue the facts in the case of Bixs arrest, even if I believe in the doctrine outlined above. My beliefs do not affect my rational powers, my adherence to logic and reason. I know how to gather and analyze facts and documents in an objective manner. I have done this for nearly 60 years, and very successfully, I may add.

 

Indeed, there are different addresses given in the police report and in the affidavit. The police report gives the residence of Sarah Ivens as 1700 Iowa St. The affidavit gives the residence of Preston Ivens as 3030 Grand Avenue. 1700 Iowa St is about 500 yards from the garage. 3030 Grand Ave is close to one mile from the garage. Gerri did a lot of research on this subject and may have more information.

 

You want to know how I view my role in the field of Bixology? No secret, nothing mysterious, no agendas, no dark motives. I am a Bix researcher. I research Bix, the man, the musician, anything that has to do with Bix, and publish my findings in jazz journals, in the main Bixography website, and in the Bixography forum. Everything is in the open, nothing is suppressed . As a matter of fact, I was the first to report in the public domain transcriptions of the original documents relevant ot Bix's arrest. That was  on Jan 7, 2001. See

 

http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/978897881

 

Albert

 

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 24, 2009 12:27 PM

Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 12:25 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: A Bix Researcher

by

Yes, you certainly can argue the facts of Bix's arrest. You just can't argue them credibly when you have already stated that you believe, as a philosophical principle and not simply as a matter of law, that Bix did not do anything to that girl. You claim an adherence, professional and otherwise, to rationality and logic, but this stands in contradiction to that.

Posted on Dec 24, 2009, 12:37 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Absurd

by

You assert that since I believe that Bix was innocent of the April 22, 1921 charge, I cannot discuss credibly the facts associated with Bixs arrest. That is absurd. I will explain.

 

I examined, objectively, all available documents  [In fact, I was the first to publish them back on Jan 7, 2001.]

 

Police Report.

-         Sarah Ivens is 5-years old and is reported to be on April 22, 1921 in Goddards garage at the corner of Locust and Grand Avenue.

-         The police report states that Sarahs place of residence is 1700 Iowa Street, about 500 yards from Goddards garage.

-         Bix is accused of taking Sarah out of the rain into a car in the garage and putting his hands on her person outside of her dress. He is arrested at his residence at 1924 Grand Avenue for Lewd and Lascivious Act with Child. Bix waives preliminary hearing and is held to the Grand Jury on $1500 bond.

-         Bix is said to have closed the door of the car, at which point the girl hollered.

-         That attracted the attention of two youngsters (18 and 16) who were working across the street.

-         The two youngsters went over and the girl went home.

Preston Ivens Affidavit.

-         Preston R. Ivens presents, in Sep 1921, an affidavit in which he requests that no action be taken by the Grand Jury.

-         Mr. Ivens was advised to drop the case against Bix for the betterment of the child.

-         Preston Ivens gives 3030 Grand Avenue as his address. [This about one mile from Goddards garage. Maybe the Ivens family moved from Iowa St to Grand Ave between April and September 1921]

-         Mr. Ivens states that on April 22, 1921 my little girl came home, told me a man took her in the garage, said some awful things to her. I ran up to the garage, then called up he police but could get no clue.

-         Mr. Ivens continues, Next day I saw two boys whom I had seen when I went to the garage, I asked I they saw a man take a little girl to the garage the day before. They said yes and told me it was the defendant.

-         Mr. Ivens states that the girl told him, the chief of police and the county attorney that the defendant asked her to show herself.

 

The case was disposed of in the following manner. The plaintiff requested that no action be taken by the Grand Jury. The final disposition of the case was No Bill filed. See my posting of Feb 11, 2001.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/981940989/

The finding of a no bill in this instance was the consequence of the plaintiff dropping the charges; it was a housekeeping procedure to officially close the case. Note also that Bix had no attorney representing him.

 

On the basis of the documentation and the doctrine of Innocent until Proven Guilty, Bix is innocent. For me, this brings closure to the case as we know it presently.

 

Of course, if new information became available, I would examine it carefully. As a matter of fact, I asked Sarah Ivens daughter if she had any documentation; the answer, alas, was negative. You see, regardless of what you may believe or write, I always act rationally and logically, and my research methodology is governed by highly demanding and rigorous standards.

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 26, 2009 3:52 AM

Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 3:28 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Innocent until proven guilty

by

You say: "On the basis of the documentation and the doctrine of Innocent until Proven Guilty, Bix is innocent."

This is not quite correct and I'll explain you why.

What you call "innocent until proven guilty" is a legal right that the accused in criminal trials has in many modern countries. It's called "Presumption of Innocence".

As said, it's the right of the ACCUSED and therefore, Bix doesn't have that right anymore because he doesn't need it. You have this right only DURING the procedure (investigation phase and decision phase (by the court) of a criminal case). When the case is closed you are not "presumed innocent", you are completely innocent.

Therefore, Bix is not innocent until proven guilty. He's simply innocent. Today, there is no case Beiderbecke...

Not even finding new documentation would change that fact. Even if you found a diary entry by that girl stating that a person (if you want even Bix) molested her as a child would make it any different. In a criminal case, a defendant has always the right to give his statement about allegations and other pieces of evidence. In this case, this is impossible.

There is almost no hypothetic possibility to change the fact that Bix is innocent. The only thing that comes to my mind is a written statement by Bix himself about this issue giving detailed information about it. I would say that this is highly hypothetic if not impossible.

Bix is innocent and will it be forever. Brendan is not quite correct about the legal aspect of this. A decision by the state acquitting a person from a certain crime lasts forever (unless the case is being reopened later) and even a dead person has some rights protecting his reputation or the reputation of his family.

I find it highly problematic to even question Bix's innocence, particularly because of the fact that the criminal investigation in this case had been closed before it really began. Therefore, the documentation of it is more than just poor. It's almost nothing. As said before, not even "new evidence" would change the fact that Bix is innocent.

As I wrote in my previous posting, the interesting issue here is not the case itself but the effects of the whole incident on Bix.

I hope most of the forumites have not experienced an arrest or a detention in custody. Those who have not experienced it usually don't know how traumatic such an experience is. I have regular contact to such people. The term "freedom" has another definition for people who have experienced such a thing in their lifetimes. Particularly for a young person, such an experience is even tougher. I have had underage clients and I know what I'm talking about. In my opinion, such an experience always leaves wounds on a person who was arrested during childhood or teenage years.

The case of Bix has other particularities which causes in my opinion even deeper wounds.

One of the reasons is the fact that the crime concerned here is the unspeakable. It's a social taboo. It's not just about an allegation of steeling chocolate from the grocery store. Just consider the fact that no biographer had mentioned the incident until 2001. Why is that so? Because even being the subject to such a case can ruin your reputation. Even if the case is closed - if you want with a court decision finding a person not guilty - people just continue talking. Just look at the case of Michael Jackson. Just consider the fact that there is still discussion about Bix's case even today.

Being accused of child abuse and being arrested are awful experiences. Just imagine the effects of this experience on Bix and consider everything what we know about him as a child. Bix was such a fragile child, loved by everyone, his mother's darling and grew up well protected with his family... How much must have this whole incident hurt Bix? I think terribly... I can imagine that he must have terrible feelings of guilt that he had involved his family into this case in which the infringement of a taboo was the subject. Bix must have felt terribly embarrassed.

After this incident, Bix was sent to Lake Forrest Academy by his father. This meant that he was separated from his family and friends who were so important to him after having experienced such a trauma.

Furthermore, his family had to spend money for the boarding school. I can imagine that this might have caused also feelings of guilt to Bix and the feeling that he was a burden for his family. It has most certainly caused a lot of pressure on him. After all this disappointment, he might have thought, that he was not allowed to fail. And this is actually, what we can read in his letter to home.

I believe the whole incident is not interesting from a criminal point of view because Bix is innocent and he will always be. This whole incident was much more an important turning point in Bix's life which wasn't the same after it.



Emrah

Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 7:16 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Reading Bix's Mind

by

There is no way to know what effect, if any, Bix's arrest had on him. No witnesses have provided information, Bix did not leave any diaries or writings on this subject, and there are no relevant interviews. Therefore, any discussion of how the arrest affected (if at all) Bix is necessarily speculative.

 

In your experience as a criminal lawyer, you have found that most people suffer tremendously when arrested. I do not doubt it. The problem comes with generalizations. What applies to one or even the majority of individuals who experience an arrest, does not necessarily apply to Bix.

 

I could argue, and there is no documentation that would disprove this scenario, that Bix was completely unaffected by the event, and that, in fact, the experience strengthened the affective/emotional ties with his family and vice versa. Suppose that Bixs parents knew with absolute certainty that Bix had not committed the alleged act. In the face of an unjust accusation, they are compelled to provide strong moral support to their son, and their love for and devotion to him become deeper; and this in turn is reciprocated by Bix.

 

Here is another scenario. Suppose that Bix's parents were quite upset about the arrest, and sent him out to Lake Forest as soon as it was possible, and that Bix was traumatized by the experience.

 

These are just two out of a wide variety of scenarios that do not contradict any known facts about Bix or any extant documents.

 

I recognize that a good number of people will believe that it is "reasonable" that Bix would have been negatively affected by the arrest. But I dont know of any specific evidence to support that view.

 

In my opinion, inquiries along these lines are unproductive.

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 26, 2009 11:54 AM

Posted on Dec 26, 2009, 11:46 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You write...

by

"The relevant questions for biographers are these: 1) did he do it? and 2) could he have done it?"

Hello Brendan and merry X-mas,

Sorry but I strongly disagree with you. Bix is not guilty and this means he didn't do it. As a criminal lawyer, I can tell you that sexual offense cases with a convicted and guilty person are very well investigated. There are several questionings and other evidences are being collected and when such a file goes to the court it's pretty thick. Considering the fact that in Bix's case the investigation didn't even really start, there is only one thing you can say about him. Bix is not guilty.

He didn't do it and the question if he could have done it can't even be asked. A presumed innocent person during the investigation is with this result of the case completely innocent. Questioning this goes against the most important principles of criminal law in any civilized country. There is no "He's not guilty but he might have done it".

As a lawyer, I experience that defendants suffer a lot just because of the accusation of such a crime and also the families of such defendants suffer. Even if the defendant is found not guilty and the accusations were clearly untrue in the ending, it doesn't mean that there is no suffering during the period of the criminal investigation and also afterwards. Many of these people need therapy and take antidepressiva.

The reason why these people suffer that such an investigation remains like a stain on the previously clean collar. Nothing is like it was before because of the fact that regular citizens continue asking themselves questions such as "did he do it?" or "could he have done it?" in sexual offense cases not considering that if the case is closed the defendant is innocent and nothing else.

The relevant question has therefore nothing to with law directly.

The question is more what were the effects of this incident on the life of the Beiderbecke family and particularly on Bix.

As you know, Bix was sent to a boarding school..

I can imagine how embarrassed he was towards his parents because of this whole issue. Not because he did it or might have done it! That's not the point. He might have been embarrassed because the whole thing took place just because of the thought that he had caused trouble for his family. That's in my opinion sufficient considering the suffering of the defendants family in such cases.

Not only this embarrassment must have been terrible for Bix. When he was sent to the boarding school, he lost all of the sudden the direct contact to his loved ones and friends. Being accused of such a crime, the shock of being arrested at this young age, the embarrassment caused to the parents and the deracination from his society must have hurt Bix terribly.

This and the effects of such a pain on Bix are in my opinion the relevant questions.

Emrah




Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 4:22 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Criminal Law & The Dead

by

Merry Christmas to you, too, Emrah.

You speak about the law and what can and what cannot be asked and assumed as if Bix were still alive.

You write:

"He didn't do it and the question if he could have done it can't even be asked. A presumed innocent person during the investigation is with this result of the case completely innocent. Questioning this goes against the most important principles of criminal law in any civilized country. There is no 'He's not guilty but he might have done it.'"

No, there is not, as a matter of law or, as I suggested to Albert, as a matter of just being a good neighbor. Except that Bix is no longer alive. Matters of law and neighborliness no longer apply. What matters is history. A historian has every right -- I would argue even an obligation -- to note that the charges against Bix were dropped and then to investigate the accusation with an eye toward finding out what happened. For me to say that right now we don't know what happened, and that, for all we know Bix may have done what he was accused of doing, is not at all to suggest that before the law Bix is anything but innocent, or not guilty, or whatever. It is not meant to suggest that I think Bix did, in fact, do something. It is not to suggest that this event in his life is more important than all the other events in his life, or that the music doesn't matter.

It is just to say that we don't know. The law does not apply here, and to treat Bix as if he were anything but a subject of history is an error, I think.

I agree with you that it is very relevant for biographers to ask how this incident affected Bix and his family during the rest of his life. I just think that it is also relevant to find out everything we can about the accusation. This, I think, would help us in knowing how it affected the Beiderbeckes later on.

Perhaps I am in a minority here. But I do appreciate your willingness to discuss the issue with me. And I hope you and your family have very happy holidays.


Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 5:10 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A maintained opinion, and why

by

A very Merry Christmas to everyone! We're all having a cozy time celebrating the holidays with our loved ones, but there's always time to peek into our email chat and favorite forums, and oh dear, here is this distressing subject again. But here's the opinion -- an opinion, mind you -- which I'm sticking to:

Okay, many among us are never going to "know for sure what really happened" but at worst - worse than a cruelly misguided and disgusting prank if that was how some see it -- how could it be anything more that a momentary if awful abberration, for whatever reason it happened? We learn that little Sarah was terribly nearsighted, and according to the report some older boy did say something smutty to her and grope outside her dress (although, I have to wonder, how does a 5 year old determine what "really awful things" are being said to her, if they are lewd? What judgment would a supposedly sheltered child, especially in those days, have on such matters? Something did frighten her horribly and brought her father to protect her, but still other items in the report aren't adding up -- inquiring who'd been near the garage an entire day after the arrest, for example.)

From the Ivens' relative's email to Albert, we read that Sarah grew grew up and continually was suffering nightmares and anxiety attacks -- my apologies that I am not immediately referencing and giving the correct name of this related descendent who sent the email message sent to Albert at that time; I read it late last night.


How far into adulthood did Sarah Ivens live? I'd read elsewhere she died as a teenager, yet we read from this email she went completely blind at age 20. This incident leading to an arrest was apparently well known to everyone in her family and her descendents. Obviously something bad and distressing must have happened to that poor child, sure. But could it be that she couldn't really see clearly who it was? No mater how often one reads over the police reports, explanation, and decision to drop the case, it's still somewhat confusing.

I stick to my guns on this: drunk or sober, a pedophile never overcomes that perversion and never would have been able to continue to control himself. The cases which I have read about, and my own awful experience of being attacked in my early teens by an older teenage boy who HABITUALLY DID THIS and was finally sent to the reformatory after my incident when I was in the eighth grade, confirm this, to my way of thinking. And MY case was kept out of court and kept out of the papers after the kind police spoke to me and my parents. It wasn't dropped "for my batterment" or to spare me embarrassment -- I was unpleasantly grilled by the principal of my junior high as soon as I got back to school on Monday, and much to my discomfort and anguish other students knew about it and made inappropriate, stupid, or otherwise unkind remarks. But that boy went straight to the slammer because now the police knew it was one time too many after the other little girls' attacks, and the kid standing around with this boy when he jumped my friends and me (we were playing in a park-like cemetery where a family was picknicking just a few feet away and didn't do a god-damned thing to help me) got into a great deal of trouble indeed, just for being there.

Youths or men with this trouble at least would not, are not, able to keep avoiding "not getting caught". Of course we read about the chronic, serial child molesters and murderers, but do you notice they always get caught, arrested, imprisoned, then let go time after time so they can do it again, still able to insinuate themselves back into commumities until finally some poor dead child's corpse is eventually connected with them, when they should have been locked up PERMANENTLY in the first place? The thing is: the law, the community, once this person is discovered, then is aware all along what monster is among them, and the law and society is to blame when these people are released from imprisonment to INEVITABLY do the same thing again. Always. They never stop. They cannot be rehabilitated.

In Bix's case, the shameful discoveries and "incidents" would have been over the next 10 years of life remaining to him, whatever the chances or roll of the dice would have been. And despite themselves someone with that sickness would have been drawn to venues where children were present -- playgrounds, amusement parks, carnivals, routes to schools -- and Tyler School across the street from his house. A youth in his late teens, continuing into manhood, who spent much of his time on bandstands, dancehalls, speakeasy saloons, recording studios, and when he was at beaches and amusement parks and other recreational areas, it was always with a peer group of people of his own age, and he dated young ladies close to his own age -- how much bothering of and attemping to pick up and seduce little girls would he have been able to do? That's where I keep chiming in, If somehow anyone would be able to positively prove without a doubt that Bix really had been the one who had molested or at least propositioned little Sarah Ivens, wouldn't it have something habitual which dogged him the rest of his short life and would be the trouble his sympathetic friends would be continually bailing him out of? (And how sympathetic could anyone be to someone like that, anyway, no matter how well-liked by colleagues, buddies, band directors?) Drunkeness, fights and muggings due to drunkeness; sloppy unconcern for his health, resulting illness, depression, and chronic forgetfulness were commented-upon troubles of Bix's, but no one was paying off infuriated parents to shut them up or bribing law officials to keep Bix out of jail and his name out of the papers. That would have definitely arisen as a distinct and memorable issue that even his most kindhearted and devoted friends would not have been able to shiftily evade and gloss over in their reminisces, no matter what their loyalty to his memory. He was innocent. Whatever poor Bix's problems were, this wasn't one of them. I'm not bleating this out of blind infatuated devotion for a jazz artists's memory; this is just how all of this is adding up to me, and I think I have the right, with my admission to you all of what happened to me 35 years ago, to know whereof I speak.


Laura





Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 1:11 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I am sorry for what happened to you,

by

as I am sorry for what happened to little Miss Ivens. You are very brave to talk of it openly.

I was unable to find the thread which contained the posting from her daughter--I was hoping to see it in its original context. Being on her side of this issue, it must have seemed to her like we were making excuses for a perpetrator who caused unimaginable harm to her mother. I for one do not doubt that such a thing happened to the little girl. If I hold doubts, it is to the identity of her abuser.

About the only thing left for me to say is that I am grateful that the pain experienced by all parties in this sorry episode are now in a better place. Also, I apologize if I am the one who dredged this thing up again.

Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 2:46 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Thanks, Alberta

by

I appreciate your very kind reply -- I guess it's to somehow explain why I always leap forward bristling with defense when discussion of The Arrest comes up on the Forum. Believe me, it's not "Ooo, I worship this hero and he's so perfect and wonderful he'd NEVER do such a thing!" Bix had his faults and troubles, a definite if still incipient substance abuse problem by his late teens no matter how he later attempted to fight his addiction; was indulged, even sometimes, it appears, quite spoiled by his doting parents. If he hadn't been, by all accounts of his friends, a basically good-natured and kindly guy, a very different sort of person might have emerged: perhaps one with an arrogant sense of entitlement, or so conspicuously selfish and inconsiderate that no amount of personal charm could be seen as anything but an affront. That's exactly how many boys of his class, gifted or not, often turned out. From what we cull from interviews and biographies,that wasn't Bix. And in every generation indulged boys from "good families" DO get away with things; victims' families are talked into dropping charges and dismissing police reports -- yep, it was attempted with me because one of my friends' mothers called our house to ask my mom to halt my family's formal complaint, or else I'D "have a bad reputation" and "would ruin this boy's life" -- and then in other cases when victims' families ARE successfully talked into complying, the boy and eventually the man does it again and again and again, when he, the guilty culprit, is released from custody. God only know where this guy is now, once he got out of juvie hall sometime in the mid-1970's, but I'm sure it's not good and no doubt there were some form of repeat offenses.

But in 1921, with Bix, if he'd been guilty no amount of talk or threats would have had him permanently "scared straight." Yet never again was there ever a hint, with all the other lurid gossip, rumors, and misinformation swirling about him since he was laid in his grave in 1931, of such an incident. Not even the most jealous of his rivals or the most dispicable of the gossipmongers, spewing slander about his "legend", ever came up with another story of this appellation to besmirch him, although they sure came up with plenty of other crap. And now, nearly 90 years later, in the most recent and respected new biographies, the police blotter report and all available documentation of the incident is there for anyone to see, and make of it what they will.

Well. I'm not going to sit crunching through unpleasant adolescent memories; it's Christmas, we're with family and on academic vacation -- on to more enjoyable chat and good times! Let's dig into the holidays!

Laura



Posted on Dec 25, 2009, 7:18 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Hot and Cool Music

by

In this whole thread, there has been hardly any mention of the music itself, which ought to plainly indicate what is "Hot" or "Cool."

Let's consider Bix's primary influence in jazz, Nick LaRocca and the ODJB. Have a listen to "ODJB One-Step," "Ostrich Walk" or "Tiger Rag," from their famous Victor records. That music comes on with an emphatic bang. Syncopated Cheetahs and Meshuggenah Monkeys come flying out the horn of the wind-up phonograph. This is music at its most extrovert, 1917 Rock 'n' Roll. It could only have excited the kids, and appalled the elders. Bix took to it obsessively, and made the ODJB songbook his own. His records of their music preserve this explosive, extroverted attitude.

Now consider these items: Bix's solos on "Louisiana" by Whiteman, "Baby Won't You Please Come Home," by Tram, "Three Blind Mice" by the Chicago Loopers, "Forget-Me-Not" by Whiteman again. On these, Bix is coming from another place completely. The attitude is contemplative, relaxed and measured, a far cry from bulging-veined Dixieland, a new way of playing jazz. This is where we hear the suspected extraterrestrial that Benny Goodman wondered about when he encountered Bix in 1923. This playing has a whole lot more in common with the Lester Young, Miles Davis, even Dave Brubeck approach of later years, than with the ODJB. It embraces the abstract, the indirect.

Bix's playing was both hot and cool, multilayered, sophisticated. Sometimes he showed more of one side than the other in a given setting, thereby inspiring both dixieland players who emphasise the hotness, and "cool" players, who go with the gauzy. I don't see any inherent contradition.

The matter of whether Bix was a "cool" guy, like a James Dean, interests me not at all.

-Brad Kay

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 1:38 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Of course it's the music

by

and it's mentioned, if in a roundabout way -- the very essence, the manner, the innovation and style of the music --progressive ideas, the restrained way of saying a great deal in a few phrases.

Again, "a cool person" in this sense isn't some affected jump-up showing off, maintaining the aloof ennui for the In Crowd, and eliciting the slavering admiration of other jaded snobs, the way the term's been known for the past 5 or 6 decades. Cool is the person who Is, and Does, and lives for their art simply because they've got to.

Laura

Posted on Dec 22, 2009, 6:20 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


To all forumites and bixophiles in the world wide web.

by

merry_christmas_happy_new_year_postcard-p239016729908054343qibm_400.jpg merry-christmas.png purple-christmas-decorations-thumb48920.jpg

Thanks for making the Bixography Forum a great success (over half a million page views in 2009) and for keeping the legacy of Bix alive.

Albert Haim

Pixel Pixel
Month       Worldwide     Month       Worldwide
January       41,444      July        52,331
February       49,461      August        53,369
March       43,592      September        47,973
April       53,813      October        47,885
May       55,836      November        47,138
June       48,930      December        20,059

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 17, 2009 5:02 PM

Posted on Dec 17, 2009, 9:33 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

No, thank YOU!

by Mike O

Your "detractors" can complain all they want, but the fact remains that this site wouldn't exist without your effort and dedication.

Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 5:32 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I second that!

by David Logue

Albert, warmest regards and Happy Holidays to you and all forumites and Bixophiles everwhere!

Thank you for providing this wonderful website, always my first stop on the internet every day.

Each time I come to the forum I find something of value from you or the many contributors here.

And each time I log into this site I hope to find your occasional announcement "Message of Great Importance to Bixophiles!" and that someone has stumbled across an amazing new find like a never before seen photo, a long lost film clip or the holy grail, the ever elusive recording of an Old Gold broadcast or studio out-take (all of which are on my Christmas list, by the way).


Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 7:09 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The First Banjo Solo?

by

The first recording by the California Ramblers dates from Nov 17, 1921. It is the standard The Sheik (of Araby)."

 

[linked image]

 

Image from Wikipedia

 

Listen to the recording.

 

http://www.redhotjazz.com/Songs/caramblers/Thesheik1.ram

 

This is from the remarkable redhotjazz archive. We get used to simply click on links and listen to recordings waxed almost 100 years ago. Scott Alexander, the owner of the redhotjazz website, deserves our profound gratitude for having created his fantastic website. Anyway, back to the point of this posting. The recording is pre-Adrian Rollini (he joined in the first few months of 1922). The banjoist in The Sheik is Ray Kitchingman, and he takes a solo.

 

I suspected that perhaps Mike Pingitore with Whiteman had recorded a solo earlier than Nov 17, 1921. I looked up Whiteman recordings and found a banjo solo by Mike Pingitore in Lonesome Hours, recorded on Jan 25, 1922.

 

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/whiteman/lnsmehrs.ram

 

Is there a banjo solo by Pingitore in an earlier recording by Whiteman? Is the Nov 17, 1921 banjo solo by Ray Kitchingman the first in a dance band/jazz band recording?

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 17, 2009 7:57 AM

Posted on Dec 17, 2009, 7:51 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

"The Sheik" by the California Ramblers is also available ....

by

.... the youtube site. Watch the terrific images. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQZCn-3nMe0&feature=related

Also in youtube, there is a relentless version by the Quintette of the Hot Club of France where Django and Stephane do a bit of a chase chorus towards the end of the recording.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6jwvS0mHwo

And don't miss this remarkable version by Red Nichols and His Five Pennies, where Glen Miller plays the melody straight,  while Jack Teagarden improvises in an obbligato above  Miller. Also a great solo by Benny Goodman.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsiczuYwy1s&feature=related

And what about this piece of extravagant nostalgia from the film "Tin Pan Alley"? Betty Grable, Alice Faye, the Nicholas Brothers, etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXkZACn8-_o

Albert



Posted on Dec 17, 2009, 8:45 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Red Nichols's "The Sheik"

by

The roster of musicians given on the record label of the reisssue of Brunswick 4805 (Album  B-1001, record 3) is the same as that given by Rust in the last edition of his Jazz Records Discography, namely,

Red Nichols, Ruby Weinstein, Charlie Teagarden - trumpet

Jack Teagarden, Glen Miller - trombone

Benny Goodman, Sid Stoneburn, Babe Russin - reeds

Joe Sullivan - piano

Art Miller - string bass

Gene Krupa - drums

Treg or Teg Brown - guitar or banjo?

The record label gives guitar; Rust gives banjo. Which is it?  The record label gives Teg. Rust gives Treg. Which is it?

Albert



Posted on Dec 17, 2009, 1:55 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Guitar,but the original question?

by Veniero Molari

Positively,absolutely,as in the Reser Jumping Jacks,but GUITAR.Who,once more demonstrates to be generally DEAF for banjo's sound,is Rust.
But this does not answer your question:which was,and when,the first "hot" banjo solo? Happy holidays,Veniero

Posted on Dec 20, 2009, 9:09 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bridget heads-up

by Mike Lewis

Dancing is understood by Postmamboists to be a deep listening state inseparable from the associated musical experience.

Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 10:26 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Your brain on music

by Bridget

Daniel Levitin's book This is Your Brain On Music talks about the evolutionary basis for music in one chapter. "The polite listening response, in which music has become an entirely cerebral experience...is counter to our evolutionary history."

Posted on Dec 20, 2009, 2:49 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Vince Giordano streaming live

by Jackie Preston

Hi Everyone,

Does anyone know if the Nighthawks are going to broadcast live online from Sophias as they used to at Charley O's?

J.

Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 9:20 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Welcome to the Bixography Forum, Jackie.

by

I am afraid I do not have an answer to your question. Sorry.

Albert



Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 10:21 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


"Stradivari's Secret" is the title of a brief note in ....

by

.... the latest issue of Chemical and Engineering News. The article is a short account of interesting findings in recent studies by French researchers: contrary to previous hypotheses, the unusual quality of Stradivari violins does not seem to be related to the varnish used by Antonio Stradivari to finish his violins. What was Stradivari's secret? The wood? Maybe extraordinary wormanship?

From the press release,

Stradivari therefore used materials that were easily obtained and broadly used in his time. The use of multiple red pigments allowed him to give a variety of tints to his instruments, which are still highly praised for their beautiful appearance. Says Echard, "Stradivari thus did not use any unusual or secret ingredients, he was simply a true master of his craft."

Are the makes of violins used by Joe Venuti known?

Albert

Here is the abstract of the original article published in the International Edition of Angewandte Chemie. If anyone wants the complete article, let me know.

The Nature of the Extraordinary Finish of Stradivarirsquos Instruments (p NA)
Jean-Philippe Echard, Loïc Bertrand, Alex von Bohlen, Anne-Solenn Le Hô, Céline Paris, Ludovic Bellot-Gurlet, Balthazar Soulier, Agnès Lattuati-Derieux, Sylvie Thao, Laurianne Robinet, Bertrand Lavédrine, Stéphane Vaiedelich
Published Online: Dec 3 2009 10:56PM
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200906553

 
Click for full size image

The composition of Stradivari\9s varnish has raised numerous hypotheses and controversies for the past two centuries, although a clear understanding of the materials could not be reached. In their Communication (DOI: 10.1002/anie.200905131), J.-P. Echard et al. describe the chemical stratigraphy of the varnishes from five representative Stradivari instruments by using a wide array of analytical techniques. In particular, Stradivari used several red pigments, and may have sought a variety of tints to give his instruments their beautiful appearance.

 

 



Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 6:13 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

EMPA violin outdoes Stradivarius!

by

EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Testing and Research) recently fabricated a biotech violin that outdoes a Stradivarius!

Here is a short article in English from the website of EMPA:

http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/87050/---/l=1

Emrah

Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 7:01 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A Link to a New York Times Article on Stradivari Violins and the Latest Research Findings.

by

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/04/science/04strad.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

Albert



Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 12:13 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Tous les goûts sont dans la nature

by Steve Robins

All of this reminds me of another blindfold test which took place in London a few years back. Well, and seriously organized, a national newspaper had got together several of the best champagne experts, with the object of finding out which really were the best bottles. With a wide range to taste, including the most prestigious labels, with prices to match, the winner was a champagne which could be bought from a popular super market chain for around 3 pounds sterling, if I remember correctly. Blindfolds removed, there were some red faces.

Back on violins,I seem to remember Nigel Kennedy talking about meeting Venuti. He relates how the aged violinist gets out his stradivarius, boasting that his instrument is surely louder than the one belonging to Kennedy, and with reason - it was amplified, with a hole drilled in the body to take the volume knob. This could be Venuti having his little joke, although Kennedy of course, knows a thing or two about violins. Or maybe the brit is also fond of tall tales.

Steve

Posted on Dec 18, 2009, 3:56 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Venuti Story.

by

Here are the exact Venuti's words as related by Nigel Kennedy. From

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2006/sep/29/classicalmusicandopera2

 

"Yeah, I got to meet Venuti in New York, just before he died," says Kennedy. "He pulled out this Stradivarius and said, 'I bet my fiddle's fucking louder than yours.' It was, because he'd drilled a hole in it for a volume knob."

 

Albert



Posted on Dec 21, 2009, 5:50 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


WTIC Radio On Goldkette

by

I found this site for WTIC radio out of Hartford Connecticut. They broadcast a series of big band interviews and programs during the 1970's and these links are on their website. One of the more interesting to Bix fans is a show on Jean Goldkette where the host talks to Spiegle Willcox and Bill Challis about Bix and the Goldkette band. The link ishttp://www.goldenage-wtic.org/BB-24.html. If it doesn't work let me know and I will send an alternate link to the main site. Sorry if this has been covered before

Posted on Dec 12, 2009, 6:50 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Thanks, Scott. This was brought up by Vince in ....

by

.... April 2008. Worth listening again!

The link you gave does not work because it has a period at the end. The following works

http://www.goldenage-wtic.org/BB-24.html

Fascinating program. We had a long thread on this, beginning with

http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/1209062300

Albert



Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 4:35 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A real treat for Bix fans!

by

Not having heard this broadcast before, I listened enthralled to the reminiscences of three legends from the 1920's being interviewed, Spiegle Willcox (aged 69 at the time), Bill Challis and Joe Venuti. Whenever the subject of Bix came up, there was a genuine warmth there in their memories of him and the great Gene Goldkette Orchestra. Unfortunately most of their "Hot" performances were restricted to their playing in public and not the recording studio. Don't miss!

Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 6:33 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


There are 42 programs in the ....

by

.... WTIC site. See

http://www.goldenage-wtic.org/log-bb.html

Albert



Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 4:57 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Simon Says

by

One of the programs is a conversation with George T. Simon.

http://www.goldenage-wtic.org/BB-15.html

Fascinating material. There is a segment where Simon talks about Bix. Here is that segment.

http://bixography.com/SimonSays.ram

Bix did not die in his 30s, but at age 28. Changes is the second recording of Bix with Whiteman (the first was Washboard Blues, discussed in a recent thread). Fantastic recording! Bix plays his solo using a mute. I wonder why he chose (or the arranger, Bill Challis) chose to do so.

Albert



Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 12:41 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A Fascinating Comment by Bill Challis.

by

Joe Venuti and Eddie Lang were not part of the working Goldkette band when Bix was with Goldkette. Eddie and Joe were added for recordings. Bill Challis said that when the numbers were played on the road, Bix would take the solos that Joe and Eddie had taken in the recording. That gave me an idea. Maybe arrangements could be made of the Goldkette recordings where the violin solo is replaced by a cornet solo in the style of Bix but keeping the guitar as Eddie had played it. I don't mean use Venuti's notes played on cornet, although that might be interesting too as an experiment; I mean a newly created solo in the style of Bix blending with the original Goldkette arrangement, instead of Venuti's solo. I hope this suggestion is not viewed as presumptuous on my part. Just an idea for expanding the repertoire of recreations/reinventions of Bix's music without copying note for note what Bix was doing.

Another related idea would be making arrangements of tunes we wish Bix had recorded (Star Dust, Angry, Too Busy, Ain't Misbehaving, etc) following closely the style of Godlkette for some tunes, Whiteman for other tunes, or Trumbauer with Bix for still other tunes, re-inventing the way these bands would have done such tunes. The model for this would be Hyman and Pletcher's "If Bix Played Gershwin." Maybe, "If Bix Had Recorded These Tunes."

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 5:52 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Stampede

by

It would have been great if there had been a Bix "Stampede" --

Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 8:27 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix solos/Challis charts

by

What you've suggested is very interesting and very possible. I've been playing a transcription of "I'm Gonna Meet My Sweetie Now" with the college jazz orchestra I direct. At a couple of rehearsals, I or one of the other trumpets "covered" the spot where the violin solo takes place while our violinist was away. Naturally, it works perfectly and I wouldn't be surprised if Bill wrote that solo spot with Bix in mind-even though Joe Venuti solos on the recording. Bix makes his presence known earlier in the chart where he's the lead voice over three saxophones and it would make sense to leave space him to improvise a solo.
I conducted and played on two radio shows produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. in tribute to Paul Whiteman in 1995-96. We made use of a number of unrecorded Whiteman pieces from the "Old Gold" radio era and many of these tunes ("Ain't Misbehavin', "I've Got A Feeling I'm Falling", "Love Me Or Leave Me" and "Mean To Me") all had spots for Bix. They were arranged by either Challis or Lennie Hayton and really displayed the jazz side of the Whiteman orchestra-both in terms of the solo spots and the ensemble writing. Too bad Columbia passed on recording these at the time!
Thanks for the great website!

Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 7:05 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Welcome to the Bixography Forum, Alan.

by

Thanks for your posting and your kind words.

Some information about Alan. He is a faculty member in the Jazz Studies program at Capilano University in Vancouver, Canada. Alan also teaches trumpet and jazz piano at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, as well as at Vancouver Community College. Alan has a lot in common with Andy S. They both have a strong interest in Bix, play trumpet or cornet and piano, and have degrees from prestigious universities in Illinois, Alan from Northwestern University, Andy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne.

The two Canadian Broadcasting Corporations programs about Whiteman were entitled "Paul Whiteman and Friends" (March 1995) and "Paul Whiteman - The King of Symphonic Jazz" (March 1996). Alan conducted and was soloist. Interesting that Alan played in one of the CBC programs Bill Challis' arrangement of Fats Waller's  "Ain't Misbehaving," one of the tunes I wished Bix had recorded. Alan, do you happen to have a recording of that tune played in the CBC program? I imagine that for Bix's solo, Challis's arrangement simply left room for Bix to do his thing.

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 5:17 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


thank you!

by

Thanks Albert for the kind introduction. Regarding the arrangement of "Ain't Misbehavin'", the opening chorus is for solo trumpet-straight melody-and was a spot for Charlie Margulis. Then follows a solo spot for Trumbauer (24 bars-the strings play the bridge), the verse (which you rarely hear today) and then a transition to the vocal. On the score, this is marked "Vocal for Crosby". After the vocal the band takes the tune out, richly scored a la "Reaching For Someone" (arranged by Bill Challis around the same time as "Ain't...")with the melody carried in 3 separate octaves {from high to low} by the strings, 1st trumpet and baritone sax. There's a solo section for Bix at the final bridge which has brass section punctuations ("shots") that help climax the cornet solo. The band plays the last 8 bars of the melody with a short 4 tag added on the end of the tune.
This material from the concerts you mentioned above did get recorded but since the recordings belongs to the CBC, I cannot share them at this time. I'm hoping to get the funding together to license and release this material at some point. We also recorded some relatively unknown arrangements for the Whiteman band by Jimmy Mundy (including an interesting "Take The A Train"), Don Redman ("Henderson Stomp" from 1926), Bill Challis ("Milenberg Joys" and "Limehouse Blues" from 1938-both built to feature the Teagarden brothers) and Artie Shaw ("One Foot In The Groove" and "Non-Stop Flight" no doubt used on Shaw's guest spots on Whiteman's Chesterfield show c.1938-39).
This is a great forum and I enjoy all the information that gets posted here.
I should mention that I wouldn't have taken up the cornet if not for Bix. When I was 9 years of age, I heard an 8 bar solo on "The Love Nest" on the RCA Victor LP "Paul Whiteman, Volume One" and I had an epiphany as to what I wanted to do with my life! Thanks Bix!

Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 2:21 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Date of Ain't Misbehavin' on Old Gold show

by

You mention you made use of Whiteman pieces from the "Old Gold" radio era and many of these tunes ("Ain't Misbehavin',
I was curious which Old Gold show the orchestra played Ain't Misbehavin' on so I got out my Evans and Evans and I am confused. Maybe someone can help.
In the index of tunes on page 555 it lists Ain't Misbehavin' on the Old Gold show of August 13, 1929. So I went to page 484 that lists the show from August 13, 1929. If you look at the list of tunes played I don't see Ain't Misbehavin' listed but there is a listing for a "Hot Chocolates" Medley. I would assume Ain't Misbehavin' was included in that medley but it is not listed.
My question is why is the tune specifically listed in the index of tunes as being on the August 13, 1929 show but on the page the show is listed Ain't Misbehavin' is not listed?
Ain't Misbehavin" is listed on page 482 as being played on the broadcast of August 6, 1929 but that date is not listed in the index on page 555 for the tune, only August 13, 1929 is listed.
Additionally if you look at the Ain't Misbahavin' listed on the August 6, 1929 broadcast Warren Scholl notes it is a Rolfe-type arrangement with an accordian solo by an unknown musician and Scholl lists no Bix solo.



Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 7:25 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Date of Ain't Misbehavin'

by

This arrangement did date from the period of the "Old Gold" broadcasts and I'm sorry if I caused any confusion as to whether it was used in any documented broadcasts. My copy of the score is undated but the violin parts (copied by violinist John Bowman) are dated Sept. 16, 1929. It's likely that Whiteman had different arrangements of "Ain't..." in the book at the time since it was becoming a very popular tune. The Challis arrangement is certainly not Rolfe-like and closer in style to "Oh, Miss Hannah" for instance. On rechecking the score, the final, improvised trumpet solo is marked "Siegrist" so this may be because Bix was out of the band. Likely, Challis may have originally intended this for Bix. I should add that I wouldn't have know to look for this chart without Bill and Evan Challis mentioning it's existence to me.


Posted on Dec 15, 2009, 10:11 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


More Arrangements of Ain't Misbehaving Played by Whiteman

by

The Whiteman band played "Ain't Misbehavin'" twice in the Old Gold Hour; first on  Aug 6, 1929 (Rolfe type arrangement with accordion solo), and again on Nov 12, 1929 (perhaps Challis's arrangement). The Sep 16, 1929 date given by Bowman for the violin part of Challis's arrangement fits nicely with the Nov 12 broadcast.

There must be at least a third arrangment.  On July 9, 1935 Paul Whiteman and His Orchestra recorded the great Waller's and Razaf's composition "Ain't Misbehaving." This is clearly neither Bill Challis's arrangement (PWC# 0021-1 in the Whiteman Collection, Williams College) as described by Alan, nor the arrangement described for the Old Gold broadcast of Aug 6, 1929. Jack Teagarden is prominent in this arrangement (vocal, solo, coda). Here is a streaming file from the red hot jazz archive.

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/whiteman/aintmisb.ram

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 16, 2009 5:29 AM

Posted on Dec 16, 2009, 5:03 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


more "ain't" arrangements

by

The Challis arrangement may have been finally played later, c.1930 when Frank Siegrist rejoined the band. Over top of the 3rd trumpet part in the score is the marking "Solo-Siegrist". That third arrangement of "Ain't.." is by a Charles Watson. We played this one, too, back in 1996 for the CBC broadcast. It's a nice chart but some of Whiteman's guys didn't seem to think so. Some of the parts are marked "Out with the NRA, Out with Watson" (!). Nonetheless, it's a good feature for Jack Teagarden and I've always liked it...

Posted on Dec 16, 2009, 10:55 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Globe and Mail, March 10, 2003

by

Alan kindly sends a scan of an article published in the Globe and Mail, a Toronto newspaper, on the occasion of Bix's 100th anniversary of his birth.

http://bixography.com/BixArticle10March2003GlobeAndMail1.pdf

http://bixography.com/BixArticle10March2003GlobeAndMail2.pdf

Thank you, Alan.

Albert



Posted on Dec 19, 2009, 6:19 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Reminder, Tomorrow, Vince Giordano & His Nighthawks

by

Saturday, December 12th

3:00pm - 6:00pm

Chartwell Booksellers

presents

HOLIDAY TEA at THREE

Vince Giordano & his Nighthawks

Eleven-piece band playing music of the 1920s & '30s

for your dancing pleasure

In the Arcade of the Park Avenue Plaza Building

55 East 52nd Street (between Park & Madison), New York, NY 10055

ph: (212) 308-0643
There will be plenty of room to dance and have a cup of warm tea while shopping and sightseeing.

This is open to the public - free of charge!

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 11, 2009 2:58 PM

Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 1:58 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Great Music!

by

The "Holiday Tea" was extremely well attended, maybe a couple of hundred people. At any time there must have been two dozen couples dancing, with ages ranging from 8 to 80!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Vince and the Nighthawks are fantastic, and so versatile: they can play sweet (Isn't It Romantic), blues (Snag It), fast and furious (My Pretty Girl), waltzes (a medley, including one of my favorite waltzes, Berlin's What'll I Do which was used, very effectively to give a nostalgic feeling to Redford's "The Great Gatsby"), etc. You name a tune from the 20s or 30s and Vince with the Nighthawks will give you a splendid rendition. Vince can switch seamlessly from tuba to singing, to bass sax, to string bass, to introducing the numbers. 

Several contributors to the forum were present, Vince, of course, Sue, Rob, Michael S and yours truly. With his characteristic generosity, Vince mentioned the Bix website and me when he introduced the tune "Sugar." Thank you, Vince, you are much too kind.

Everyone enjoyed the excellent music and the festive atmosphere. A great day in the Big Apple.

Albert

[linked image]

 



Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 6:34 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Great Music!

by

Dear Albert,

It was a pleasure to be there and to greet you and Mima. As I write this, I am downloading nineteen videos of Vince and the Nighthawks onto my blog --http://www.jazzlives.wordpress.com. They will take a day to be active, but the posting is called THOSE VERSATILE NIGHTHAWKS! and the songs are:

LIMEHOUSE BLUES (a la Whiteman) / SAY YES TODAY / DEEP HENDERSON / BLUE MINOR / WHEN THE FOLKS UP HIGH DO THAT MEAN LOW-DOWN / I GOT RHYTHM / ISN'T IT ROMANTIC? / AIN'T MISBEHAVIN' / THE TERROR // POWERHOUSE / SUGAR* / SNAG IT / MARGIE (vocal Brian Gari, Eddie Cantor's grandson) / MIDNIGHT, THE STARS AND YOU / YOUNG AND HEALTHY - FORTY-SECOND STREET / IRVING BERLIN WALTZ MEDLEY / ROYAL GARDEN BLUES* / KEEPIN' OUT OF MISCHIEF NOW / MY PRETTY GIRL*

*of special interest to Bixians! Jon-Erik Kellso plays Bix's solo on SUGAR, and goes for himself on ROYAL GARDEN BLUES.

Until next December!

Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 8:37 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Obviously, ....

by

.... (from right to left) Michael, Rob and I were enjoying immensely the versatile music of Vince Giordano and the Nighthawks.

[linked image]

Albert



Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 5:02 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


If you did not see and hear Vince and the Nighthawks live on Sat, here is your chance ....

by

.... to see them on the screen of your computer, thanks to Michael S.  Go to

http://jazzlives.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/those-versatile-nighthawks/

Excellent report, video and sound. You get a good feeling for the atmosphere, the band, the listeners, the dancers.

If you were there, this is a chance to revisit the numbers that you particularly enjoyed.

Thank you, Michael.

Albert

PS I did not catch who was saying "Hey Al" during the "Sugar" segment. Did anyone?



Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 1:13 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


"Hey, Al!" with great enthusiasm

by

The shouting voice in several of those clips was clarinetist Sol Yaged, who also hollered encouragement to trumpeter Mike Ponella even when Ponella wasn't playing. I confess that I moved to the other side after perhaps two numbers because I found Sol's enthusiastic clamor a touch distracting. Yours in the name of cinema verite . . .

Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 7:36 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


An unnecessary distraction

by

Yes, I agree, it was very distracting. When the shouting started I thought some loon had wandered in off the street. I was expecting him to be ejected from the premises by Security.

Posted on Dec 16, 2009, 11:59 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


"Copyin' Hoagy."

by

Hoagy recorded his composition "Washboard Blues" several times. The first was with the Hitch's Happy Harmonists (without Hitch) on 5-19-1925. Hoagy directed and played piano, including a short piano solo where, at one point, he changes the tempo considerably. The next was with Paul Whiteman on 11-18-1927. He has a short piano solo which he copied from himself. The Casa Loma Orchestra recorded "Washboard Blues: on 3-16-1931. Pianist Joe Hall copied Hoagy's solo. Listen to the three solos in sequence, in the order given above.

http://bixography.com/PianoSolosHHHPWCLO.ram

Any other copy or copies of Hoagy's solo by other than Hoagy himself? Old or new. Don Bestor's band is on the sheet music (see below), but I don't think he recorded the tune.

Albert

 Here is a scan of Whiteman's 1927 recording signed by Bill Challis, courtesy of Joe Giordano.

[linked image]

An image of the sheet music with Don Bestor orchestra

[linked image]





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 11, 2009 9:26 AM

Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 9:25 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Hoagy's solo was discussed before.

by

Here is the url for the first posting in the thread.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/27140/message/1223850593/

In one of the subsequent postings, Brad wrote, "Far as I know, no printed version of 'Washboard Blues' has ever included this solo part." According to Sudhalter's "Stardust Melody," this is how the piano solo got created.

"Wickemeyer had his doubts about Washboard Blues right from the start, especially the slow (120 bpm) tempo. Worse yet, after listening to them, the technician abandons his nest of pulleys, weights, and cranks to inform Hitch and his companions that the thing is too short by 20 seconds-11 percent of the three-minute playing time of a 78 rpm record. An eternity. Hitch, unruffled, doesn't miss a beat. 'Hoagy will put in  a piano solo, ' he says. The musicians file out for a smoke, leaving the composer to his panicked thoughts. And by the time they return he's got something. A bit of the blues, some double-time stuff-and in bars 5 and 6 an elegaic little phrase he'd some day extract for use in another, even better known song."

The red hot jazz archive has two other versions of Washboard Blues with Hoagy doing the singing and the playing. One in 1933

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/hoagy/Washboard2.ram

and one in 1956.

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/whiteman/washboardbluespw50.ram

Neither of these includes a piano solo like the one in Hoagy's recordings from 1925 (Hitch's Happy Harmonists) or 1927 (Whiteman).

jazzonline has several other versions of Washboard Blues

Mildred Bailey http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/ramc/VOC22905.ram

Red Nichols http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/ramc/BRU20992.ram

Tommy Dorsey http://www.jazz-on-line.com/a/ramc/VIC019426.ram

None of these three versions have a piano solo like Hoagy's piano solo in his 1925 and 1927 versions.

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 11, 2009 1:09 PM

Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 12:44 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Gennett Saves a Building

by

Er, sort of. But my eyes popped when I opened the local paper this morning and there was a guy holding a Gennett 78 (Moonshiner's Dance, Part One) on the cover. This is the kind of place and story that you'd see and hear on Phil P's Bus Tour to Hell during the Racine Bix Tribute. Here is the link:

http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/music/79024237.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ

I suspect many forumites have heard the delightful record, a fixture of Harry Smith's famous Anthology of American Folk Music album.

Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 7:06 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

1. Revised American Dance Band Discography. 2. Essays on Discographies.

by

1. There is information about the Revised Edition of Rust's American Dance Band Discography in the American Dance Band yahoo group.

"Just had a phone call from Richard Johnson [not Rich Johnson] to say that the discography is at the printers with a publication date of mid-January 2010.
It consists of 4800 pages, with indices, in 5 volumes. Price will be $125 per volume or $500.00 the set plus postage. Bound in Columbia Royal Blue with gold blocking."

I hope it will be available on CD and/or by online subscritpion.

2. Some interesting articles about discographies by Will Friedwald.

On Discography http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2009/5/27/on-discography

Rust Never Sleeps http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2009/6/10/friedwald-discography-two

The Detectives of Jazz. http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2009/7/3/friedwald-discogrpahy-three

And don't fail to read the introduction of  Allan Sutton's article in

http://www.mainspringpress.com/MORTON-DISCOG.html

Albert



Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 6:43 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

The Death of Tom Stacks

by John Leifert

No, not the Vernon Dalhart remake of "The Death of Floyd Collins"... I was rummaging through Dismuke's Hit-of-the-Week site a little while ago, and found out why you don't hear anything about Tom Stacks (the drummer and vocalist with the Harry Reser band) after the mid 30s or so:

On February 12, 1936, Stacks was playing drums with the Earl Carpenter band for a Catholic Holy Name Society party at Lum's Chinese Restaurant located on the second floor of 735 Lexington Avenue in New York City when a fire broke out in
one of the building's ground floor shops. The fire quickly spread to the restaurant and set off a stampede among the 150 who were inside. Stacks initially escaped the building but went back to retrieve his drums. He died a week later in the hospital from burns to the hands and face.


- Dismuke


A tragic end for somebody who always made me smile whenever I heard his voice on a record...

John L


Posted on Dec 10, 2009, 3:45 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Too Busy

by

Tom Stacks with the Clicquot Club Eskimos recorded this terrific tune (one of my favorite tunes in the whole wide world) on 6/14/1928. Great arrangement and a guy scatting behind Tom. Who is the guy scatting? Listen

http://redhotjazz.com/Songs/reser/eskimos/toobusycce.ram

The arranger must have loved "Berceuse" from the opera Jocelyn by Benjamin Godard. He interpolates it twice.

This is not the first time that "Berceuse" is interpolated in a dance band recording. Listen to the beginning of this fantastic recording of "Leave My Baby Alone" by the Golden Gate orchestra.

http://bixography.com/leavemybabyalonecr.ram

Albert



Posted on Dec 10, 2009, 5:02 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Berceuse / Because !!

by John Leifert

This is a tremendously witty interpolation of "Berceuse", interpolated I would think due to the closeness in the spelling to "Because" (My Baby Don't Mean Maybe Now). What a stroke of brilliance! I wonder whose arrangement it was?

I suspect the scatter may be Larry Abbott, who may be in the saxophone section. He did record scat vocals on dance band discs...

John L

Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 9:56 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


I doubt that it has to do with ....

by

... similarities in spelling between Berceuse and Because. I think it has to do with similarity in notes. Listen to the first few notes of each tune, first Too Busy then Berceuse.

http://bixography.com/TooBusyBerceuse.ram

Albert

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 13, 2009 10:32 AM
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 13, 2009 10:31 AM

Posted on Dec 13, 2009, 10:30 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


More Similarities

by

Try this one, Makin' Whoopee and Ain't Misbehaving

http://bixography.com/MakinWhoopeeAintMisbehavin.ram

And one noted by Brad in his thorough analysis of Cradle of Love, Cradle of Love and Makin' Whoopee.

http://bixography.com/CradleMakinWhoopee.ram

Albert



Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 5:11 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


OK, I'll grant you that...

by John Leifert

...but I do like the pun anyway!

JL

Posted on Dec 14, 2009, 8:42 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Lou Black. CAUTION: long post!

by

Michael K and I have been talking about Lou Black, banjoist who knew Bix in 1922, when Bix used to sneak out from Lake Forest Academy to go to Chicago to  listen to the NORK and other jazz bandsLou Black is mentioned once in Evans and Evans book, and four times in Rich Johnson's The Davenport Album. Here is a bit of biographical data from

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:fbfpxqrgldse~T1

This banjoist was born and died in a Midwest town called Rock Island, but as a musician he strictly inhabited jazz territory. He began flailing on the banjo as a child, and at 16 was playing professionally with Rock Island's most swinging combos. Pianist Carlisle Evans fronted a riverboat band, which represented the young banjoist's first road trip in 1919, although it was a river and not a highway that carried the S.S. Capitol along. Early in the '20s, Black joined up with the New Orleans Rhythm Kings group at the Friars' Inn venue in Chicago. He stayed with this outfit for several years, joining the Original Memphis Melody Boys in 1923 for a wee stint before returning to the employment of earlier bandleader Evans.

Beginning in the mid-'20s and continuing into the early '30s, Black picked up a position as a staff musician on radio WHO in Des Moines, IA. It might have been the built-in obscurity of this station that got to him, but he wound up quitting music entirely for a time period roughly equal to the number of years he had already been alive. That took him all the way up until 1961, and in the process he missed having to make the same decision that almost every other jazz banjoist did (i.e., switching to guitar). Theoretically having achieved some kind of balance between playing music and not playing, he began a short but final period of activity on the banjo. In 1963 he surprised Dixieland jazz fans by sitting in with various groups around New York City. Later that year, the banjoist began playing gigs around the area of Moline, IL. In late 1965 he was injured in a car crash, then died from a heart attack while still recuperating in the hospital. The Black discography consists mostly of archive recordings done during the early days of
the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, and he does not seem to have recorded during his '60s period of music-making.

There is an article about Lou in the New Yorker of Nov 2, 1963. Here is an abstract of the article from the New Yorkers Archives website.

Vance Bourjaily, Whitney Balliett, The Talk of the Town, A Burning Desire, The New Yorker, November 2, 1963, p. 37

ABSTRACT: Talk story about Lou Black, the original banjoist with the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, a seven-piece white jazz group that set Chicago on its ear in 1921, when it opened at the Friar's Inn. Black has made a part-time comeback recently. Writer got together with him, here, through Vance Bourjaily novelist & assistant prof. of English at the State Univ. of Iowa. Black retired from music in 1931 & has become a successful businessman. He is 62, was born & still lives in Rock Island, Ill. He works for the Moline Consumers Company where he's an outdoor-building materials man. He hadn't touched the banjo in 30 years; he started playing again when his daughter asked him to teach her the banjo. Since last August he's been working two nights a week at the Arabian Room of the Holiday Inn in Moline, with a trio, & the place is packed. During his visit to N.Y. he went over to Bourbon Street & was asked to play his banjo. He started playing when he was seven. He began professionally in 1917, with a dentist named Wrixon [Doc Wrixon, AH]. In 1919 he joined Evans' Original Jazz Band. In 1921 he went over to the New Orleans Rhythm Kings. They broke up in 1923 & then he joined the Memphis Melody Boys; in 1925 he rejoined Carlisle Evans. Later he joined Station WHO in Des Moines, where he stayed until 1931.

 

I only have access to the abstract. Does anyone have access to the complete article? If you are a subscriber of the New Yorker, I believe you do. I wonder what the article has to say about Bix.

 

Lou Black made recordings in 1922-1923 with the Midway Dance orchestra , the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, The Original Memphis Boys and the Chicago Blues Dance orchestra.

Here is a great recording of Eccentric, the terrific tune by J. Russell Robinson, by the NORK. Lou is clearly audible.

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/nork/eccentric.ram

 

Here are a couple of interesting articles about Lou Black.

 

The Post Standard, - December 1, 1963, Syracuse, New York

 

NO COMEBACK, IF YOU PLEASE

Old Jazz Picker Hot Again

ROCK ISLAND, IL.

"One thing I can't stand is a has-been who tries to make a comeback

Lou Black, 62, a banjo player who worked with some of the great bands of the Roaring 20s, is being rediscovered by old time jazz buffs and is reluctant to return to the old limelight.

Lou said he thought the sudden interest in him was first generated some months ago when he'd taken a part-time playing job at a local nitery.

During a recent trip to New York City, Black made tape recordings at the request ofRobert J. Mantler, prominent music researcher. "Then, some old timers contacted me and the next thing I knew I was sitting in at some New York nightspots. Black said. Later he made some records for Columbia. Then an invitation came from Brian Rust, British music critic, to make a series of appearances in London. "I haven't decided whether I want to make the trip to England and I don't know how many more trips to New York I'll be making. "I'm happy in my selling job, with my little part-time music job and living with my wife on Rock Island."

Black was born in Rock Island and began fingering a banjo at the age of 7. He played well enough in a few years to "work small local jobs." Lou joined the Carlisle Evans dance orchestra in 1920. They played a number of Midwest spots, a season in New Orleans and for a time offered entertainment on the excursion steamer, the Capitol,which then plied the Mississippi River between St. Louis, Mo., and St. Paul Minn.

During the next few years, Lou played with the New Orleans Rhythm Kings , the

famed Dixieland Jass Band, and King Oliver's Creole Jazz Band, Jean Goldkette's dance orchestra and other bands in many of the nation's biggest cities. Later came a season with a band formed by Jack Teagardcn. There also were side jobs with other great names, among them Bix Beiderbecke, a native of Davenport, Iowa and also a musician in his 20s. In 1928, Lou said, he tired of traveling and with Mrs. Black and their two children moved to Des Moines where he look a job as assistant program director with radio station WHO. Black left WHO in 1931, came to Rock Island and "put away my banjo."

A few months ago, the daughter of an old family friend asked Lou to teach her to play the banjo. He agreed loosen up his cramped, aging fingers and started practicing himself. Then he started playing some of the old time tunes that sound good only when played on a banjo; then he bought another banjo, this time for about $1,000; then "a couple of guys my age joined me" and the combo went to work. They work only Friday and Saturday nights because we have daytime jobs," Lou said. His sidemen are Lee Stoctcrau on the piano, and Bert Kells, a saxophone and clarinet player. They play "mostly old time jazz with modern piece now and then," Lou said.

The Blacks have a son Louis Jr. who lives in Detroit with his wife and three children,  and adaughter who makes St Louis her home with a husband and four children.

Return lo the limelight, Lou? "Naw I got a ready made audience any time we have a visit from my son and his family and daughter and her family, all at one time."

 

 

Des Moines Sunday Register, Jan 12, 1964

 

Old Rhythm King Lou Black Beats the Dust Off His Banjo

By Gene Raffensperger

MUSIC world, particularly that segment that reveres Dixieland, had given up Lou Black for dead. Indeed many of the famous contemporaries of his era were dead. Black, who was born and reared in Rock Island, IL was and is one of the great banjo players. In an era when the banjo was a solid rhythm instrument, Black was a star on a Mississippi River boat. He play ed in the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, top drawer in the music world of the Roaring 20's.

Black was a friend of the immortal Leon "Bix" Beiderbecke, the cornet player from Davenport. He also played with Jelly Roll Morton, Leon Rappola [sic] and other greats of the jazz era. A fan once said of Lou Black, "He's got paws like a bear, but he picks that banjo with a feather." A music critic who heard Black play many times wrote "He.'s a Dixieland man first last and always. It comes out no matter what he plays."

But at age 30, in the prime of his career, Black put down his banjo. He was disgruntled with the turn of music. He watched the guitar and bass replace the banjo in bands. Sadly he saw his beloved banjo laughed off the center stage to become in his words "a .taxi driver's instrument."

So Black carved out a new career as a salesman, and his banjo gathered dust in his home in Rock Island. A year ago the daughter of an old friend came to him and asked to learn the banjo. "I told her I didn't want to play," said Black, now 62. "I was done. I hadn't played for 30 years. I had nothing to play for."

But the young woman persisted. "I began to play a little more all the time," Black now recalls.

I realized that something had gone out of my life and now it was coming back."

Black on banjo, and two friends, Lee Stoeteray on piano. Bert Kells on saxophone, were booked into the Holiday Inn in Moline, III., late last summer. They are still there, playing two nights a week. Sitting on that stand some of the old magic returned to Blacks fingers and gave life to the Dixieland beat in "That's a Plenty," "Bill Bailey" and others. The applause washed over him again as it had done 30 years ago. They hadn't forgotten Lou Black at all, and a whole new generation had newly found him.

"I'm getting a tremendous kick out of this," says Black. "But sometimes it makes me want to cry. I can't help but think of all the fellows who can't be here to play again. My fingers don't do what they used to, but my mind knows more."

They still remember Lou Black in New York and Chicago, too. Thanks to urging by his friend and hunting companion, Vance Bourjaily, novelist and assistant English professor at the State University of Iowa, Black returned to New York. He made oral tapes for a jazz buff who is writing of the era.. He sat in with the band at Bourbon Street, and played until 4 a.m. when the audience would not stop calling for more. He would like to make a record or two, but he will not again make music his fulltime career.

"Nothing is sadder than an old has been trying to make a comeback," he feels. Then why did he come back as he has?  "The banjo has been maligned for a long time and I want to prove it doesn't deserve that. A lot of years in my life went to waste. I don't suppose I could have kept the banjo alive, but I didn't help things by quitting. When I first started to play the banjo I had an insatiable desire to be the best. I suppose now I'd just like to prove I can still do it."

 

Some comments.

 

-         Lou Black is said to have played with Bix, King Oliver, Jean Goldkette and Jack Teagarden. Maybe the mention of Bix applies to Bix sitting with the NORK. But King Oliver, Jack Teagarden? Josh, do you know anything about Lou Black playing with Goldkette? My understanding is that Howdy Quicksell was with Goldkette from the beginning to the end. Jelly Roll Morton ? There is a NORK session (July 17, 1923) with JRM, but the banjoist, according to Rust, was Bob Gillette (later with the Wolverines).

-         Lou Black Jr. is mentioned in one of the articles. Michael K tells me that he played last week with Lou Black, Jr. who is 86 and plays drums! Michael, did you ask Lou if he has photos or letters or a diary from his father?

 

Albert

 







 

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 9, 2009 8:19 AM

Posted on Dec 9, 2009, 8:16 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

CAUTION: long New Yorker extract!

by

Mr. Black again rubbed his hands together briskly, and we asked him when he had first taken up the instrument.

"When I was about seven," he replied. "I was born in Rock Island, Illinois, where I still live. My dad was a conductor on the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific, and he played banjo, and he and my mother used to sing old songs like 'Nelly Gray.' I had a burning desire to play the banjo, and it was my brother started me on it. Oh, my, he was good! When I was around twelve, I met a banjoist named Homer Garber in Des Moines, through relatives, and he showed me some things. He was a clerk in a cigar store, and he was the best banjo player I've ever heard. I started professionally in 1917, with a dentist named Wrixon. He had a four- or five-piece outfit, and we played the Rock Island society parties, the country club, and a dance hall named the Coliseum, which is still going. My schooling -- I'd been through twelve years in nine -- was already over, and in 1919 I joined Carlisle Evans, a pianist and good, solid orchestra man. Evans' Original Jazz Band, his group was called. In 1920, we worked on the riverboat Capitol between St. Louis and St. Paul in the summer, and around New Orleans in the winter. Leon Rappolo, the clarinetist, was in the band, and so were Emmet Hardy, a marvelous cornettist who never recorded, and Leon Prima, Louie's brother. I left Evans in 1921 and went over to the New Orleans Rhythm Kings, which already had Rappolo, Jack Pettis on saxophone, Frank Snyder on drums, George Brunies on trombone, Paul Mares on cornet, and Elmer Schoebel on piano. Steve Brown, the bassist, joined after me. We were at the Friar's Inn for a couple of years, and when we'd finished work, or when there were no more customers to play for, we'd go over to the Dreamland and sit in with Pop Oliver and Louis Armstrong. You know why he was called Pop? When he played, his right eye came almost out of the socket from the force of his blowing. It was the damnedest sight I've ever seen. He had enormous lips, too, and his cornet mouthpiece would disappear right inside them. Once in a while, he'd stand up there in front of the band, cradle the cornet on its valves on a handkerchief in his left hand, put his right hand in his pocket, and play ten or eleven choruses of 'Tiger Rag' or 'Dippermouth Blues' without ever touching the valves with his right hand and without repeating himself. Nobody ever matched Pop Oliver, except BIX BEIDERBECKE, who sat in with us when he was in town. Once, someone wrote out one of Bix's solos note for note and, without letting on, put the transcription in front of him and asked him to play it. Bix, who was a grand kid, looked at the music and looked at him, and said, 'Hell, I can't play that fancy stuff!' Dave Tough and Jimmy McPartland and Bud Freeman used to hang around, and Jelly Roll Morton did, too. Well, the Rhythm Kings broke up in 1923 ...

[All-cap emphasis mine]

Posted on Dec 9, 2009, 10:14 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Thanks for taking the time to copy the long piece.

by

I note the following in what Brendan copied.

We were at the Friar's Inn for a couple of years, and when we'd finished work, or when there were no more customers to play for, we'd go over to the Dreamland and sit in with Pop Oliver and Louis Armstrong.

Was it common for white, young Chicagoans (both native and imported) to sit with bands of black musicians in the 1920s? The accounts of such sittings come from white musicians recollections years after the events. Are there objective, e.g., newspapers or magazines of the 1920s, accounts of such sittings? Were these after hours for Dreamland events? I understand that, occasionally in the 1920s, in the color-blind environment of recording studios, black and white musicians would record together. But would they play together in the bright lights of a dance hall with customers listening and dancing?

Albert



Posted on Dec 10, 2009, 6:13 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Addendum

by

Bix sat with Louis after hours.

Did professional, established musicians from one band sit with other bands in the 1920s? Or were young musicians on their way to become professionals more likely to do so?

Albert



Posted on Dec 10, 2009, 6:53 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Lou Black

by Sue

I met with Lou Black Jr. when I was temporarily homeless following Hurricane Katrina. Nice guy and very interesting! But he only had a couple of photos (no diary) and some home recordings from the early 1960s with his father on banjo and his mother on piano. He plans to make the recordings available at some point.

Nothing was mentioned about Bix in the material I saw (other than the articles in Albert's post), nor were there any photos of him.

I will have copies of the photos in my Roppolo/NORK book (which lacks only 2 chapters at this time).

Sue

Posted on Dec 9, 2009, 4:26 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Lou Black

by mkaroub

It seems possible that Black played with a Goldkette booked unit-there were several.I can only assume writer named players Lou had played with. with some hyperbole ..as I get it the WHO band in Des moines fell victim to depression economy.Lou may have more material, stories always intersting hearing about meeting Mares in Chgo in 30s or inviting Steve Brown over for dinner.The link to Beiderbecke is strong both quad cities natives born 2 years apart.
the extract from New yorker was also in Balliet book -and i know lou has a copy..

Posted on Dec 9, 2009, 7:08 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Re: Lou Black

by Bruce Bogen

There is a young high schooler in Geneseo, Illinois, who is a pianist, composer, drummer... and is considered a sort of prodigy there. His name? Carlisle Evans-Peck! I know the family, so I'll have to inquire if there is any connection.

Posted on Dec 10, 2009, 3:57 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The presence of Bob Gillette in the ....

by

.... NORK-Jelly Roll Morton recordings of Jul 17 and 18, 1923.

Mike (Dr. Jazz website) kindly informed me, "According to Laurie Wright in "Mr. Jelly Lord" page 14 . . . "Early listings have given Lou Black as the banjoist, but when interviewed he denied his presence and suggested that Bob Gillette might be responsible." Therefore, the assignment of Bob Gillette is tentative. As a matter of fact, in the Jelly Roll Morton discography,

http://www.doctorjazz.co.uk/page15.html

the name of Bob Gillette is written in red,  "The names of musicians that appear in red typeface indicates that there is some uncertainty as to their actual presence on the recording."

Albert



Posted on Dec 11, 2009, 5:09 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A Detailed Analysis of Bix and Tram's "Singin' the Blues."

by

[linked image]

Scott Deveaux and Gary Giddins'  book  "Jazz."  was published by W. W. Norton & Co in Oct 2009. It is a 704-page book described as follows in Gary's website,

http://www.garygiddins.com

The story of jazz for the general reader as it has never been told before, from the inside out: a comprehensive, eloquent, scrupulously researched page-turner. In this vivid history of jazz, a respected critic and a leading scholar capture the excitement of Americas unique music with intellectual bite, unprecedented insight, and the passion of unabashed fans. They explain what jazz is, where it came from, and who created it and why, all within the broader context of American life and culture. Emphasizing its African American roots, Jazz traces the history of the music over the last hundred years.

Bix Beiderbecke is mentioned 19 times in the book. I transcribe here the analysis of "Singin' the Blues."

[linked image]  [linked image]

Note that Bill Rank is given as the trombonist. It is not. It is Miff Mole.

Albert

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 8, 2009 4:29 PM

Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 4:26 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Ode to Bix is a suite ….

by

. composed by Earl A. Rohlf and inspired by the style of Bixs piano pieces. It consists of four parts: Bix Bash, Bix Lives, Ode to Bix, Rhapsody for Bix.

 

From Polecat Records (Mike Polad).

 

[linked image]

 

[linked image]

 

The suite was recorded by Marvin Ash and is brought to you through the courtesy of Enrico. Thanks!

 

http://bixography.com/OdeToBixEarlRohlfMarvinAsh.ram

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 8, 2009 1:41 PM

Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 1:40 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Geoff Muldaur interview on Fresh Air

by

Just wanted to mention that there was a great interview with the
blues/folk musician and Bix enthusiast Geoff Muldaur on NPR's
"Fresh Air" today. It's available online:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=13

Posted on Dec 7, 2009, 4:19 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Did he talk about Bix?

by Andrew Vaaler

I caught the last 15 minutes of the interview, and didn't hear anything about Private Astronomy, his Bix album. Was it mentioned earlier? I did enjoy hearing him talk and sing.

Terri Gross loves good music, and she always seems to glow a little brighter with a musical guest. Even when the vulgar, tongue-wagging Gene Simmons walked off her show (or did she pull the plug, I can't remember), it seemed a victory for everyone that cares about good music. I'm glad she's still on the air.



Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 6:26 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Bix is mentioned briefly at ....

by

.... about 4 minutes and a bit more extensively at about 8 minutes.

Albert



Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 10:53 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


NPR Review of Private Astronomy: A Vision of the Music of Bix Beiderbecke

by

There is a link in the December Fresh Air interview on NPR's website to their earlier review of Geoff Muldaur's 2003 album "Private Astronomy: A Vision of the Music of Bix Beiderbecke." On that album the "Futuristic Ensemble" plays the piano pieces with instrumentation like that of the Bix and Tram small band recordings. The NPR review also included "Singin' the Blues" with vocal track by Martha Wainwright and a delightful tribute version of "Take Your Tomorrow."

Unfortunately, the album and MP3 tracks are not currently for sale on Amazon.

Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 6:44 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Welcome to the Bixography Forum, Glenda

by

For the convenience of readers, here is the direct link to the Fresh Air review.

http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1440418

I gave this link in my review of Geoff Muldaur's CD. See 

http://ms.cc.sunysb.edu/~alhaim/recordingstributes.htm#visionmusicbixmuldaur

I played two tracks from the CD in two of the WBIX programs, "In the Dark" (#97) and "Davenport Blues" (# 158).

Albert



Posted on Dec 28, 2009, 6:28 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


An Interesting Version of "In A Mist."

by

From the Timeless CD "The London Gabrieli Brass Ensemble, The Influence of Jazz." There are two pieces in this CD, "Jazz Colours" and "Magnolia Suite." The last track in the "Magnolia Suite" [another track in the Magnolia Suite is "Singin' the Blues."] is entitled "Inner Bix." It is really "In A Mist" arranged for two trumpets, horn, trombone and tuba.

Listen, courtesy of Rob. Thanks for your generosity, Rob!

There is another version for a brass quintet by the Westwind Brass. You can hear an excerpt in

http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/westwind/from/payplay

Albert

PS I will add this recording to my list of "In A Mist" recordings. I had missed it because the title was changed to "Inner Bix."

 

 

 



Posted on Dec 6, 2009, 10:31 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Nothing there but a red x

by Laura Demilio

and then the other one you have to download and pay for on an MP3 or whatever it is.



Posted on Dec 6, 2009, 2:02 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


You are supposed to get ....

by

.... the icon of a player and the music should start immediately. Try this instead,

Copy and paste bixography.com/InAMistBrass.mp3

As for the other version, I simply gave the link so that forumites could listen free to an excerpt and for information purposes.

Thanks for alerting me. I wonder how many readers get the red x instead of the icon of an mp3 player. I would appreciate if forumites let me know if they get an x or the music starts streaming as soon asthey open the posting. Thank you.

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 6, 2009, 2:35 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Geoff Muldaur got there first....

by

This arrangement sounds very like the one of "In a Mist" by Geoff Muldaur's Futuristic Ensemble in his album Private Astronomy, done earlier this decade.

This one can be heard on the "Bix Mix" (see right sidebar) on the "Beiderbecke Affair" weblog of Brendan Wolfe athttp://www.beiderbecke.typepad.com.

Both of these are quite fine interpretations, which point up the musical genius of Beiderbecke.

Posted on Dec 27, 2009, 6:35 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


A Remarkable Pair of Brunswick Records. Red Nichols and His Five Pennies.

by

On March 2, 1928, Red Nichols and His Five Pennies (in fact, 11 instrumentalists, Red Nichols, Leo McConville, Manny Klein, Miff Mole, Dudley Fosdick, Fud Livingston, Murray Kellner, Arthur Schutt, Carl Kress, Art Miller, Vic Berton, and one vocalist,Scrappy Lambert) went into the Brunswick studios and recorded, as was often the case with Brunswick records, two versions of "Can't Yo Heah Me Calling, Caroline?" one with a vocal refrain (Scrappy Lambert again!) and one without vocal for the non-English speaking world (Germany, Austria, and I think Argentina), Br 20062 and A-5044, respectively.

 

In general, the two recordings made by Brunswick for the two audiences were very much the same, except that the vocalist in the American version was replaced by an instrumental solo in the German version. However, here is a departure of this trend. In Br 20062, the solo at 2:30 is taken by Red, sounding in parts uncannily like Bix. In Br A-5044, the solo at 2:22 is taken by Fud Livingston. I only heard these two versions once, but it seems to me that Reds and Fuds solos follow rather similar patterns. We are dealing with 12-in records, sort of semi-symphonic arrangements a la "Sweet Sue," with hot solos by Red and Fud in the two versions. There must be other differences, Br 20062 is 4 min in length whereas Br A-5044 is only 3 min 50 sec.

 

Listen to the vocal version first

 

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/nichols/CantYoHearMeCallinCaroline26775.ram

 

and then to the non-vocal version

 

http://www.redhotjazz.com/songs/nichols/CantYoHearMeCallinCaroline26777-G.ram

 

Albert

 

 





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 5, 2009 5:37 PM

Posted on Dec 5, 2009, 5:14 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Bix will always be top man

by

Red or Bix? Today Bixophiles know every record he made, including alternate takes. So we know if it's Bix or not instantly. Back in the twenties, both musicians had their devotees. Then, many preferred Nichols because his various bands sounded "hotter" than Tram's groups and the 'Gang' sides. But Bix was unique among horn players in that he had that tone, sound and style that no other musician, black or white, had then or has today, 78 years after his death. Or ever will have. "They all wanna sound like him, but there 'aint none of 'em play like him yet". Praise indeed from Louis Armstrong. Red is a creative player who deserves his place in Jazz History, but Bix will always be No. 1.

Posted on Dec 6, 2009, 5:02 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Power Point Presentation for 2005 Bix Cruise

by

To view the Power Point presentation I gave during  the 2005 Bix cruise, go to

http://bixbeiderbecke.com/PowerPointPresentations/PowerPointPresentations.html

and click on item # 3. The file size is 51.8 MB.

Albert



Posted on Dec 4, 2009, 12:11 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

From Marc Myers''s Interview of Terry Teachout

by

Among the many gems in the interviews, this one called my attention particularly.

TT.Armstrong always described his own playing and performances in terms of what he recalled from his past. He saw his playing as a way to paint pictures. He talks about being on the bandstand and thinking about things that happened to him in his life. Duke Ellington was the same way. In my experience, this is not how musicians generally refer to what they do and how they do it.

How do musicians generally refer to what they do and how they do it? Is there any documentation? I imagine that of all musicians, Artie Shaw, who was remarkably cogent and highly articulate, must have said or written something on this subject. Other musicians? Bix was reticent and said little. I don't remember Bix's fellow musicians telling much about what Bix was doing and how he did it. If anyone talked about this, it would have been Bill Challis.

Bix's piano compositions do tell us something about what Bix was doing or trying to convey, especially the titles: contrasts in light and darkness, chiaroscuros. But his cornet solos? Complex and varying feelings yes (buoyant in "From Monday On," poignant in "I'll Be A Friend With Pleasure," bittersweet in "I'm Coming Virginia," etc) but what else, if anything?

I am surprised that Louis saw his playing as a way to paint pictures. There are distinct art forms, painting, writing, music. Each has its own language, different and unique. Granted that some music conveys or paints images ("La Mer" by Debussy, for example), but I don't associate images from Louis's past with his playing of, for example, "Star Dust." What was Louis painting when he played "West End Blues" or "Potato Head Blues"? Can someone explain?

Albert



Posted on Dec 4, 2009, 6:53 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Expanding on the above posting

by

Teachout tells us that Armstrong described his playing in terms of what he recalled from his past, thinking about things that happened to him in his life. In the context of what was going through Armstrongs mind when he played, Teachout further tells us that Armstrong saw his playing as "a way to paint pictures." I put these together and infer that Armstrong was trying to convey his state of mind when he played "what he recalled from his past," that he was painting pictures when playing. This, according to Teachout, is rather unusual. So my question is what images did Armstrong want to evoke in the listener when he played, for example, "West End Blues" or 'Potato Head Blues", what pictures was he painting?

 

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 5, 2009 8:03 AM

Posted on Dec 5, 2009, 6:44 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


The Actual Statement by Louis Himself.

by

"When I blow I think of times and things from outa the past that gives me an image of the tune. Like moving pictures passing in front of my eyes. A town, a chick somewhere back down the line, an old man with no name you seen once in a place you don't remember."

From Terry Teachout's Armstrong biography.

Albert



Posted on Dec 6, 2009, 4:49 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Synesthesia

by

Music isn't always music, when you're in the middle of making it. It can easily be a mingling of senses - something felt, seen, tasted or remembered - and converted to sound, just as Louis said.

I can vouch that when the Muse is in, and the sound has a life of its own, I am NOT thinking about anything technical to do with music, such as what key, what chord voicing, and so on. I could be trying on dark green, or tasting sweet potato, or remembering someone. The musical result probably won't evoke the same stuff in the listener, but she'll catch on that something is happening, and that it's more than just noises emitted from an instrument.

Of course, Louis Armstrong was far galaxies beyond mere technique, and could express in music anything he imagined or sensed.

My favorite kind of music happens when the artist reveals worlds, and makes me forget the specific instrument he's playing, or style he's doing. Bix is the March poster boy for this, and there are many others. I love it especially when someone does that using the humblest of instruments (washboard, kazoo, harmonica, banjo, etc.).

-Brad K

Posted on Dec 7, 2009, 11:05 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Charlie Parker

by David Logue

This discussion reminds me of the Charlie Parker (sorry, Albert) documentary based on Gary Giddins' book "Celebrating Bird."

There is an interview with drummer Roy Haynes where he humorously recalls playing with Parker at some gig. While Bird soloed on "The Last Time I Saw Paris," he kept building his solo up faster and more furious, until afterwards, Haynes had to ask him, "Bird, what really DID happen the last time you saw Paris?"

Haynes also recounts how Parker was very quick witted when soloing. If a pretty girl walked by the bandstand, Parker would suddenly burst into a phrase of "A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody".

Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 10:28 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


For strange images associated with Bix's ....

by

.... "In A Mist", visit

http://www.nme.com/awards/video/id/q_3m4bbsLdc

I prefer, infinitely more, the images in Lisa's youtube videos that feature Bix's piano compositions.

Albert





    
This message has been edited by ahaim on Dec 8, 2009 11:39 AM

Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 11:20 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Edward Kennedy "Duke" Ellington was a ....

by

.... synesthete. Synesthesia is a condition in which one type of stimulation evokes the sensation of another, as when the hearing of a sound produces the visualization of a color. That was the case with Duke Ellington. According to Don George, "Sweet Man: The Real Duke Ellington," the Duke saw timbres as colors.

Albert



Posted on Dec 8, 2009, 12:20 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Whiteman Records with Columbia

by

The Oakland Tribune of June 20, 1928 carries a story about Whiteman recording for  Columbia Records and some ads for his recordings. One of the ads has Whiteman's last name misspelled. His views about jazz are outlined.

[linked image]

Albert

 



Posted on Dec 3, 2009, 4:45 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

1920's musician who played with Scranton Sirens dies at 104

by

I have one of the Scranton Sirens Okeh recordings posted on my youtube page:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VS08AxMN04

In the text comments an Aaron1912 just commented a musician who played in the band in the 1920s, a banjo player named Robert Degan just died at 104 years of age. Aaron1912 also mentioned that his death has just been announced at the New York Times website.
Anyone have any information on Robert Degan? I was amazed to learn a musician who played with the Scranton Sirens in the 1920's just died. Must not be too many 1920's musicians left. Sadly this one has left us.

Posted on Dec 3, 2009, 1:54 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home

Link to the ....

by

Times-Tribune article.

http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/scranton-native-credited-with-writing-famed-hokey-pokey-dies-at-104-1.447701

Albert



Posted on Dec 3, 2009, 2:08 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


Link to the ....

by

New York Times article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/arts/music/03degen.html

Albert



Posted on Dec 3, 2009, 3:22 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home


What a fabulous recording!

by

Wow! I really liked that one!

Posted on Dec 3, 2009, 7:12 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home