Return to Index  

But it is a failure to see

March 21 2010 at 12:30 AM
JB  (Login daat)

Response to My option...


that the scriptures are not meant to be historical or in the most part to be taken literally that causes discrepencies and historical difficulties. If you work on the basis that scripture interprets scripture then there should be little inconsistant with interpretation. For example, the word eye is used through scripture but here is where scripture interprets scripture:

Ephesians 1:18

The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,

Here we see that the eye is connected to understanding that leads to enlightment.


There are also names, numbers, places and gender that have similar keys to unlocking the mystery concealed in the narratives. JB

This message has been edited by daat on Mar 21, 2010 12:34 AM

 Respond to this message   

Find more forums on Religion and PhilosophyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement