In answer to your post:
TBT: a) the notion that the bible is inerrant
JB: I dont claim the scriptures are inerrant but how do these particular verses validate your claim, the bold print you offered is unconvincing.
TBT: b) four authors displaying blatant discrepancies regarding the same event
JB: Blatant is an emotive argument, can you provided tangible evidence that these are real discrepancies and not perceived discrepancies.
TBT: c) and the parts within my post in bold might have something to do with that
JB: Why can they not all have occurred over the course of this event? I don't see the bold items as presenting a conclusive case for your assertion. In my previous post I divided common and enhanced accounts.
TBT: So, if the babble is indeed inerrant, the chitter chatter of the four alleged authors in question should convey exactly the same thing since their utterences address the same event. As it so happens, their chit chat shows incontrovertibly dissimilitude, as emphasized in bold.
JB: I don't believe you have presented sound evidence to support this claim. Is there anything else you can include that might add further weight to your argument? JB