"According to the bible and believers"
That is a pair of generalisations.
Not so. What I say believers say about the bible and god may be a generalization, but what the bible says about god is fact, right?
When you assume that to be true the rest of your argument is subject to that assumption.
Exactly, which is precisely what the argument does.
The argument assumes to be true what the bible says about the nature of god, it doesn't deny those parameters set by the bible, it goes with them - it's the parameters themselves therefore, doing the denying (internal contradictions and all that, you know, explicit contains implicit).
So, if you disagree with the argument, you are free to rebut it - if you can't or won't, so it be - and the argument stands, available for proper refutation. http://www.network54.com/Forum/272761/message/1278678100/The+Art+of+Disagreeing
People : intrinsically intelligent.
When people turn together, they could become a herd.
When people turn a herd, they could become sheeple.
When people turn sheeple, they could become dumb animals.
When people turn dumb animals, they become treated as such.
New!! Improved!! Now With T-Formula!!
The human brain can only comprehend 3 categories to put information in