.... that it actually addresses -the intrinsic value of- what the question entails. When an alleged answer does no such thing, it's a response and does not qualify as an answer.
When something happens once, it might be an occurence.
When that something happens twice, it might be a coincidence.
When that something happen thrice, it's neither a mere occurence nor a coincidence, it's structural/intentional.
Ergo, you structurally/intentionally do not actually answer a question asked, which, of course, paints you a certain colour, of your own making, since your reponses imply you either cannot, will not or dare not answer the question asked.
it's not what you manage to utter that matters, it's what you manage to show true that does
- truth is something that can be demonstrated to be fact and fact is something that can be demonstrated to be true -
New!! Improved!! Now With T-Formula!!