The "Dickweed"term has been used for about a weed. If you understood laws about the definition of new products and ideas, you'd know that something is considered new for much longer than a week. You're pattern of behavior exceeds the legal definition of new, and therefore earns the claim "over and over".
Extending the red herring fallacy and the ad hominem fallacy instead of addressing the actual subject matter.
So discussing a moron that makes insincere and selfish prayers to a God they he doesn't believe in, and then expects to demonstrate something when his prayers aren't met, is on topic for the forum... And poignantly addressed the heart of the subject at hand... And doesn't meet the criteria for an ad hom fallacy.
2 paragraphs to refute your 2 claims of pseudo-intellectual bullshit... Effective and efficient at the same time. You should try it some day. Unfortunately, we all know you won't, and probably even can't.
Extending the 'claims but no substantiation' mode.
-it is not what you (think you) know that matters, it is what you can show true that does
after all, truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true - everything else ... mere opinion-
New!! Improved!! Now With T-Formula!!