Well JVH.

Guess wer'e not going to get any answers.

 

Which is not surprising when a proper context is missing (hence the question asked).

So, it's not so strange really (hence the question asked).

The question asked is twofold: to establish an intended meaning (establishing value if you will); and therewith, possibly, establishing a consensus (a proper context); an identifiable starting point, to go from.

This is particulary important when subjects offered (for closer scrutiny) happen to carry multiple connotations (that dreaded ambiguity thing), when a context doesn't clarify what connotation may be meant; when a context (unintentionally) steers towards a not intended connotation or when a context is missing altogether (ambiguityfest par excellance).

Consensus first, the rest will follow.......

 

---

rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : incontrovertibility
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -

New!! Improved!! Now With CD-Formula!!


CD: short for inevitability