After all ... statements of a transcendent or immaterial nature equal incoherency as such connotations have no ontological status
The logician: 'here are the demonstrable facts
what conclusion can we draw from them?'
The believer: 'here is the conclusion
what alleged facts can we conjure to justify it?'
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
New!! Improved!! Now With CD-Formula!!
CD: short for inevitability