Goes to show it doesn't take much to convinceApril 16 2012 at 4:33 AM
JVH say (Login JVH)
Response to The thing that convinces me most is the arctic core sampling
... you, since you took the pirate/temp graph seriously as well.
"The pirate/temp graph is a religious proof anyway. Dont trust any of them."
When one wants to show something true, one needs to show the mechanics of it, simple really. Where religion is concerned you seem to be perfectly aware of this principle, yet, when other stuff comes into play, you seem to have forgotten about the same principle. Why's that?
You also chose not to address the part of the post that matters although you responded to it - kinda like what ardent religionists do as well really: they will respond to one's post when in disgreement with it but will not address what the post actually says, which, of course, is a dead give-away if there ever was one.
rejected and denied by many, accepted and embraced by few : falsifiability
- it is not what we (think we) know that matters, it is what we can show true that does
as the maxim demands; truth is demonstrably fact and fact is demonstrably true
everything else ... mere BS -
New!! Improved!! Now With CD-Formula!!
CD: short for inevitability
|This message has been edited by JVH on Apr 16, 2012 6:21 AM|
This message has been edited by JVH on Apr 16, 2012 5:15 AM
This message has been edited by JVH on Apr 16, 2012 5:10 AM
This message has been edited by JVH on Apr 16, 2012 4:38 AM