truthbetold (no login) Posted Feb 6, 2010 11:20 AM
The case against seems to seriously outweighs the case for.
But, don't take my word for it, let's take it to the test.
You provide your arguments for, I provide my arguments against and we'll see who provides the stronger (perhaps even deductive) arguments.
Since the claim that a supernatural Jesus was a historical person precedes the instance of questioning that claim, I must grant you the first go in support of the claim.
If you don't wanna, then at least provide the evidence in support of your claim that I am assuming otherwise your claim means nothing ... other than, of course, that you are assuming that I am assuming.