<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

NEWSBREAK: Gough alleges favourtism

November 16 2008 at 1:46 PM
  (Premier Login AlexRoberts)
Forum Owner

 
Gough believes that their is some favoutism afoot in terms of choosing the one-day team. Do you agree?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/england/7731961.stm

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Gilzean
(no login)

Chatterbox

November 16 2008, 7:04 PM 

Certainly the one of the most talkative ex-captains Yorkshire have ever had. I can't think of anyone in the post-war period that could up with our Darren. Is there cricketing subject he is not a self-styled expert on?

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login YoungClogger)

Re: NEWSBREAK: Gough alleges favourtism

November 16 2008, 9:55 PM 

I agree. Matt Prior has no right to be in the team. Mustard and Read can both keep and bat better than Prior, but then they aren't chums of Moores.

 
 Respond to this message   
Triple Centurian
(no login)

batting order

November 17 2008, 8:14 AM 

i would love to see Gough v Boycott in a debate about the England one day batting order - Gough wants Bopara at 3 and Boycs wants Flintoff opening, KP at 3 and Colly at 4

Unlike the Yorkshire top order where we are struggling to find an opening pair, the England team would appear to be flush (but a busted one?) with options but its just that not many of them are very good options at the moment.

Looking at scoreboard whats the Indian for 'deja vu'?

 
 Respond to this message   
Ian
(no login)

Re: NEWSBREAK: Gough alleges favourtism

November 17 2008, 10:40 AM 

I see no other reason for Luke Wright being in the team, other than favouritism.

 
 Respond to this message   
Gilzean
(no login)

KP defends England selections

November 17 2008, 4:16 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
Steve c.
(no login)

Excellent.

November 17 2008, 5:49 PM 

Can i be the first to suggest that Michael vaughan would make a brilliant England captain for the Ashes next year....

 
 Respond to this message   
dpressed
(no login)

Re: NEWSBREAK: Gough alleges favourtism

November 18 2008, 12:05 AM 

That would be one way to stop Mr Vaughan failing as a Yorkshire opener Steve

 
 Respond to this message   
Jimmy Kerr
(no login)

"The Spin" takes the Micky out of "Dr Gough"

November 18 2008, 1:44 PM 

From CRicinfo's "The Spin"

"We have favouritism in selection," Gough explained - before England
lost yesterday at Indore. "England have got potential but we seem to
ignore players who, for me, are definite starters in one-day cricket.
We won the Hong Kong Sixes with Graham Napier, Dimitri Mascarenhas,
Tim Bresnan, Len Hutton and Wilfred Rhodes. They deserve a chance."
(Two of those names have been inserted for the sake of a very cheap
gag, but the Spin felt Napier and Bresnan deserved a mention.)

Dr Gough's diagnosis was not over. "England lack something in one-day
cricket I can't quite put my finger on," he said, just about
resisting the temptation to put his finger on his own chest. "Our
one-day thinking has for years been behind the eight-ball. I played
in two World Cups and we never looked like winning - we did well to
win a game to be honest."

As cricketers from the United Arab Emirates, the Netherlands, Kenya
and Zimbabwe nodded in sad agreement at thrashings past, Gough may or
may not have outlined a remedy in which the batting would be opened
by Herbert Sutcliffe and the bits-and-pieces role played by George
Hirst. "We still don't know our best batting order," he blustered.
"Matt Prior's batting at the top of the order but has had a few
failures now and his confidence might start to go. Luke Wright is a
good player for the future, but is he good enough to be in the
starting XI?" Aye, they don't make 'em like they used to.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - NEWSBREAK: Gough alleges favourtism
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
All IP addresses are recorded. We reserve the right to remove sexist,
racist, defamatory or abusive comments and unapproved advertising.

whiteroseforum.co.uk

Email us