<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

2009 Season Reviews Thread

September 28 2009 at 10:11 AM
  (Premier Login AlexRoberts)
Forum Owner

 


Watch this thread for season reviews.

First up, the Daily Mail: Link to Daily Mail

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

(Premier Login AlexRoberts)
Forum Owner

The Telegraph

September 28 2009, 6:36 PM 


The Telegraph Link to the Telegraph

 
 Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)

The Yorkshire Post (Chris Waters)

September 29 2009, 1:10 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
triple centurian
(no login)

Re: The Yorkshire Post (Chris Waters)

September 29 2009, 1:36 PM 

Chris Waters seems less critical this year than he did last season and his obvious dislike of Yorkshire that came across loud and clear in 2008 is less apparent in 2009 where I would tend to agree with his views and analysis.

Apart from Joe Sayers as player of the season? Most improved - definitely, but tricky to put him ahead of Rudolph or Gale who also had one day successes to add to their 4 day games.

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

A statistical review from the Times

September 30 2009, 4:07 AM 


 
 Respond to this message   
WRF
(no login)

Cricinfo (The batsmen)

September 30 2009, 2:07 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
WRF
(no login)

Telegraph and Argus

October 1 2009, 11:19 AM 


"Anthony McGrath has revealed that there have been times this season when he has not known which way to turn." (Telegraph and Argus)

Link to T @ A

 
 Respond to this message   

(no login)

CMJ's take on the 2009 season

October 2 2009, 4:30 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
nick
(no login)

Re: CMJ's take on the 2009 season

October 2 2009, 10:28 PM 

hanks for these articles. excellent reading.

 
 Respond to this message   
Alan Jackson
(no login)

Hughes' piece is a MUST READ!

October 9 2009, 12:10 AM 

I hope you all got a chance to read Simon Hughes' season review in the Telegraph. It is excellent and is a must read if you want to understand where county cricket is headed. Our moderator has it linked in an earlier post in this thread, or click:http://www.network54.com/Forum/274761/thread/1254129100/last-1254518913/2009+Season+Reviews+Thread

 
 Respond to this message   
dpressed
(Login dpressed)

Re: Hughes' piece is a MUST READ!

October 9 2009, 10:51 AM 

I agree with Mr Hughes ... buts that because I've been banging on about counties poaching players for a few years. And Durham aren't as good as everyone claimes ... yes their bowlers are mainly local (although Claydon certainly isn't) .. but the batting heavily relies on 'imports'

 
 Respond to this message   
triple centurian
(no login)

Re: Hughes' piece is a MUST READ!

October 9 2009, 10:57 AM 

Thorp isn't local to Durham either, nor Blackwell.

I didn't mind Durham signing a load of players when they started out in 1992 in the CC and then a few years back I thought they had developed a fair few decent youngsters and they were then going to have a home grown policy (remember Gough (not Darren but Michael), Daley, Pratt?).

However, the game has advanced and Durham have moved with the times to chase the big pay days, hence the need for immediate success on the pitch.

 
 Respond to this message   

(Login stu789)
Assistant Moderator

Durham

October 9 2009, 12:06 PM 

They have just 3 home produced bowlers in their side in Harmison, Davies and Onions. Breese, Claydon and Thorpe are kolpacks and born in the Windies or Australia, Plunkett was born In Middlesbrough and poached from us and Blackwell was signed from Somerset.

 
 Respond to this message   
dpressed
(no login)

Re: Durham

October 9 2009, 12:13 PM 

I'd give Durham Plunkett. Its Yorkshire's fault that he went North rather than south just like Chapple went to Lancs although he's from Skipton.

& there sare two Harmison's ... although Ben is more of a batsman than bowler

 
 Respond to this message   
Brian
(no login)

Re: Durham

October 9 2009, 2:56 PM 

Whilst Chapple was born in Skipton, it's incorrect to see he's "from" Skipton, as such. His family home was in Barnoldswick but the local hospital there didn't have maternity facilities and as such when the day approached Mrs. C. was ferried to the nearest appropriate hospital, which was deemed to be Skipton; it could have easily been Burnley then there would have been no doubts. This story was related by Chapple himself.

 
 Respond to this message   
Guest
(no login)

Re: Durham

October 9 2009, 3:04 PM 

I can relate to this story from personal experience. The day before I was born I was in a local town hospital near Middlesbrough. Overnight for some reason my mother was moved to one of the bigger hospitals before my birth as there must have been some possible complications. When my father went to the local town hospital to be told his wife had been moved to one of the bigger hospitals overnight, he nearly had heart failure for fear that I had been moved to Stockton (north of the Tees and therefore outside of the Yorkshire boundaries).

Fortunately, for him, my mother had been moved to Middlesbrough (south of the Tees and in the North Riding of Yorkshire) so when I was born I was still eligible to play for Yorkshire.

Unfortunately, it was all immaterial as it turned out I was not good enough!!

 
 Respond to this message   
TYke 1950
(no login)

Re: Durham

October 9 2009, 3:51 PM 

Wasn't Barnoldswick in Yorkshire prior to the 1974 boundary changes?

 
 Respond to this message   
Brian
(no login)

Re: Durham

October 9 2009, 5:27 PM 

Unfortunately, it was all immaterial as it turned out I was not good enough!!



Immaterial in any case in this day and age!!

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - 2009 Season Reviews Thread
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
All IP addresses are recorded. We reserve the right to remove sexist,
racist, defamatory or abusive comments and unapproved advertising.

whiteroseforum.co.uk

Email us