photo toplogo1_zps46807118.jpg

 photo americlps_zpsavfgvdau.jpg

Dag Evert's "American Classic"

As mentioned on the forum, heres a picture I took some time back, with natural winter daylight.
A 2100, and a 1377, both guns have been recrowned, and had their trigger parts shimmed for play,
contact surfaces stoned, and trigger springs somewhat reduced within safe limits.
The 2100 has had its barrel shimmed with tape to remove play.
Both guns give great accuracy for the money if they are given good pellets!
The combination of pellets and guns in the picture represents something close to my boyhood dreams:-)
-- Dag Evert

 Return to Index  

760 vs 761XL

August 24 2011 at 10:15 AM
Tim McMurray  (Login Mac-1)
Crosman Forum Member
from IP address 69.234.48.201


Response to Differences bettween 760XL and 761XL?

761XL's had a hammer dampening bumper like a 1300 on the early self cocking systems as well as an oversize steel bolt knob.. Standard 760 was smooth bore. They also had Brass colored sideplates and rifleds barrels.
The 760XL was a later gun on the hammer drop design. At that point I think all the guns were rifled. They were also a lot cheaper made with lots of plastic. Not special. The 761 was.
You could fit a rifled 761 barrel(761-003) to a 760 and if you did not abuse the barrel with BB's it could be a real sleeper 760. Put together right these little plinkers can be insanely accurate with the 761 tube.
I don't have any left but I'd bet there are some out their squirreled away.

[linked image]

"NO GUNS WOULD BE A RIOT"

Later

Tim

Mac1 Airgun



 
 Respond to this message   

Crosman Corporation 1-800-724-7486
This forum is not affiliated with the Crosman Corporation in any way// Information presented in this forum is intended for informational purposes only; use at your own risk//Posts made to this forum are soley the opinion of the individual member