logo by smgunner

Dean's HiPac 2240

Tactical Trijicon ACOG TA01 Style 4x32 Cross Sight Rifle Scope + Kill Flash
TROBB Solid Aluminium Dovetail Power Block with Gmac hollow probe and G-mac Bolt
Gmac Brass Power Adjuster Spring And Guide/Drilled Out Standard Valve For more air space
Hammer Mods//Gmac 30% Lighter valve Spring/Gmac Brass Safety Catch//Transfer port drilled out
Full Gmac Trigger kit/Gmac barrel cut to 9inch/Weihrauch Silencer/Custom Home Made Grips/
New TRACER LEDRAY GL2 LAMP 90m Range Beam//HI-Pac

 Return to Index  

My way may be too simple to be "right".

June 30 2012 at 8:32 AM
  (Login gubb33ps)
Crosman Forum Member
from IP address 68.105.50.68


Response to Gas velocity - port hogging relationship


Change the valve in some way, and the results will change, but if just looking at transfer port, can get an idea. Might be toosimplistic, but it seems to point in the right dirction for me.

So lets say you are playing ONLY with the transfer port.

Set your sweet spot velocity limit to whatever you choose, just keep the same strict limit for all transfer port sized tested. BEST would be a percentage limit...I tend to 3% of max.

Then it becomes the number of shots X the average energy.

Lets say we got the following 3% sweet spot with various sizes of transfer ports:

.07 = 35 shots @ 8 foot pounds = 280
.075= 30 shots @ 10 foot pounds = 300
.08= 25 shots at 13 foot pounds = 325
.085=20 shots at 16 foot pounds = 320
.09= 15 shots at 19 foot pounds = 285

That would lead me to believe the that at that pressure range, with that valve set up, a transfer port giving something in the 13-16 foot pound range is probably at its optimum. Change some other factor, like the operating pressure or the valve cycle, and would need to retest.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

Crosman Corporation 1-800-724-7486